I have been noticed many Brahmin writers and historians majorly fabricate surname or theft identity those are famous in their skilled field and rare person to object to those fabricated & theft facts. They always hack their caste certifying them Brahmins fabricating their history linking any forefathers forefather or any subject or identity linking the identities were belongs to Brahmins to maintain their status higher in the society. Which is one kind of identity or fame theft for personal and organized benefits to promote their race. I identified many Brahmins writer and historians are master in identity theft to promote their race. You can verify it yourself. First I noticed them in the case of Chanakya. Chanakya never believed in fourfold caste system and he was dead against to fourfold caste system, idol believes and never believed in God and was even anti Brahmins with some quotes of his own. He served to a Atishudra kingdom named Mauryan empire that has been even promoted to Ksatriya from Shudra after the Mauryans regime by only Brahmins. Evidences are also there he had adopted Jainism but Brahmins portray him as a Brahmin with three parallel lines on his forehead promoting he had an affiliation to Shaivasm with shikha fashioned hair like Brahmins in his back head with white body complexion which is more than 100% lie and that has been transferred generation to generation but nobody encounter their claim. First thing is why a Brahmin will help to a Shudra king those even don’t want to touch shudra’s shadow for untouchability aspersion! Second is Nanda king had drove him from his kingdom insulting he was an ugly dark complexion royal adviser, but Brahmins portray him as white complexion. Jains never believe in idols or God so its an atheist faith then how he could worship Shiva so that he had used shaivasm symbol in his forehead? There is no proof exists he was worshiping Shiva then how it is claimed and for which intention? I collected many chanakya quote books and surfed many websites from different parts of the country and found they have also fabricated his works inserting caste system, God, hell and heaven etc. those are not his real work but insertion of Bramhanic philosophy is definitely work of Brahmins not by Kshatriyas, Vaishyas or Shudras so it all points these are all antisocial activity by Brahmin writers with an evil or malicious intention to promote their race with miscarriage of information. By logical interpretation it concludes that Ashokan’s ancestors and Chanakya had followed “Ajivika” but after the adoption of Buddhism by Ashoka Chanakya had even followed Buddhism. To dominate the history and to prove supremacy of Brahmanism over Buddhism; history passed by Vedic or Brahmanism promoters that Chanakya had embraced Jainism in his last life. They had also fabricated herbal medicine science of India “Ayurgyan” to “Ayurveda” for racial hegemony over this knowledge replacing “gyan” with “ved.” There is no proof exists Charak & Shusruta was from Vedic or Brahmins origin or their compiled work has any relation with Brahmanism race or has connections with vedism without only fabrications & fake claims. I have been also detected they used the word Avatar to theft identities form different pagan famous identity like Rama, Krishna, Shiva etc. etc. from different linguistic tribe or races for their self and organized benefits to promote Sanatan Dharma where they were individual identities with their own fame in their time but used by Brahmins with honey coated lies to promote Bramhanism or Sanatan Dharma. These identities has no link or no affiliation with Santan Dharma but used as puppets for Santan Dharma followers to control their mind by Santan Dharma agents for self and organized benefits. In the age of Brahmins Jains were Shudra but due to Brahmins persecution most of them embraced Business as their prime profession so in this ways most of them uplifted themselves form Shudras to Vaishyas.
Now I am exposing this kind of theft or activity in present days even using wikipedia by that kind of mentality. The example is Satyajit Ray.
Satyajit Ray ( listen (help·info); 2 May 1921 – 23 April 1992) was an Indian filmmaker, widely regarded as one of the greatest filmmakers of the 20th century. Ray was born in the city of Calcutta into a Bengali family prominent in the world of arts and literature. Starting his career as a commercial artist, Ray was drawn into independent filmmaking after meeting French filmmaker Jean Renoir and viewing Vittorio De Sica‘s Italian neorealist film Bicycle Thieves (1948) during a visit to London.
Now see this section in wikipedia where itself says Satyjit Ray belongs to Brahmins origin.
Now lets see What is Bramho Samaj.
It all points to Satyajit Ray is belongs to Brahmins. Now see another proof which points he is not a Brahmin but something else 🙂 i.e. from royal origin. Click on pic to go source page.
In India, it is an anglicized version of Rai Chowdhary or Roy Chowdhary, also written as Roy. The name comes from the same root as Raj, which is also the root of the Latin rex (king), English reign and royal, etc. Now move to next proof. See the snap that has taken from a Blog. Which states Ray surname belongs to Namasudra!
Namasudra is nothing but origin from Shudras. See this snap from wiki.
Now lets see another horrible truth from a list of Notable Bengali Brahmins from Wikipedia where the name of Satyajit Ray is not listed in famous Brahmans name! The snap is taken on Friday, 26th February 2016. Even his grandfather Upendrakishore Ray Chowdhury and his father Sukumar Ray is not listed in this list. How a great personlity like Satyajit Ray is not included? Is it a mistake or intentional? It means the page creator Brahmins do not consider Satyajit Ray is a Brahmin and consider him from Shudroid origin. Now it implicates either the biographer of Satyajit Ray wants to portray him as Brahmin or some Brahmins wants to portray him as Brahmin due to his fame; in both the case a Shudra is exposed.
Satyajit Ray encountered Brahmanism in the movie Sadgati.