What is Hindu and what is RSS?, and what is the conspiracy behind RSS’s “Bharat Mata ki Jay?”

  • What is Constitutional basis of “Father of India”? If no, then why it is used in official communication by Government of India? Is Indian Government dominated by specific favored mindsets?
  • How can be “Father of India” a real person that existed and “Bharat Mata” a hypothetical person as a symbol?
  • What is constitutional basis to “Bharat Mata”? Is it a specific mindset which is enforced to Indian citizens?
  • How came a standard picture of “Bharat Mata” was adopted by everyone depicting her similar to a Hindu goddess? Is she a mother or a goddess?




Now major religion in India is Hinduism which is about 96.63 crores according to 2011 census. Hinduism was not existed before Islam came to India. Hindu word is coined by invaders basically from Saudi Arabia, Turk, Iran, Mongolians and Afghanistan regions those had embraced Islam for their political gains.

The Sindhu River, also called the Indus River, or Abāsīn, is a major south-flowing river in South Asia. The total length of the river is 3,180 km (1,980 mi) which makes it one of longest rivers in Asia. It flows through Pakistan, the Indian state of Jammu and Kashmir and western Tibet. Originating in the Tibetan Plateau in the vicinity of Lake Mansarovar, the river runs a course through the Ladakh region of Jammu and Kashmir, towards Gilgit-Baltistan and then flows in a southerly direction along the entire length of Punjab, Pakistan to merge into the Arabian Sea near the port city of Karachi in Sindh. It is the longest river of Pakistan.


Majorly foreigners and Invaders used to designate inhabitants of Indian region according to the river Shindh/Shindhu which is majorly now in Pakistan. They were wrongly pronounced “sh” to “ha” or dropped the letter “s” so it became Hind; afterwards they used to designate their captured demography as Al-Hind, Indoustan/Hindustan/Hindusthan and its dwellers to Hindu when Islam ruled the demography after 700AD. Later some Islamic rulers used to the word Hindu to represent non-Muslims. We can say Hindu means slave to Islamic rulers. Shindu civilization or Shindu clan i.e. river side dwellers of river Shindu now named as Shind province which is a major part of Pakistan. Hindu and Hindustan identity streams from this Shindu river and its river side clan name; which has no relation with other linguistic group found in Indian demography which are more than even 1600 linguistic races in present India. Major population of India those practice Vedic Varna system or Caste system are well known as Hindus. When India got partition in 1947 according to the major faith followed by the root-natives at that time as Hindu and Muslim i.e. as Hindustan and Pakistan this river Shindu and its Shindu clan should be the part of India instead of Pakistan; because major faith followers of Hindustan was Hindu but it became part of Pakistan. If we go through the origin of Hindu according to its demographic origin then Pakistan is real Hindustan not India. We have one nation but three names? Till to date we are having conflicts what is our true country name? lol India is having three names i.e. India, Hindustan and Bharat. Our constitution says “We the people of India” but when it translated to Hindi, it becomes “Bharat” how? and why? Is it possible phonetic will change changing the language? How a name changes with language? If somebody say “Rama” or “Rahim” and when we represent it in Hindi language it looks and spells like “राम” and “रहीम” nothing else. In that protocol when India is translated to Hindi it should be “इंडिया” not “भारत.” Now lets come to find reasons, why our country named so? India is derived from Shindu->Indu->India where Hindu is derived from Shindu->Hindu->Hindustan in both the case Hindu or Indu had no affiliation to any religion it just represents riverside dwellers of Shindu river. So Hindu had no affiliation to any religion before it branded to Santan Dharma or Brahmanism after post Islamic period in India. It is river Indus though as a modified term. Indian region even partly or wholly had several names at different era in history, like Aryavartha, Jumbudvepa, Tianzhu, Hodu, India major and minor, Bharatavarsta, Hindush, Hind, Al Hind, Yin, Indoi, Ind, Hindustan etc. Most of these names has one common origin i.e. river Sindu aka Indu or Indus.  The present name India has happened three times in the history i.e. in 400BC, 100BC, 1200AD. and the present name is the fourth time. Each name have their own history situations. Regarding the present name India:-  River Indies(in European terms)/ River Indus (Persian, Greek)/ Sindu (Sanskrit) was known since ancient times because of its large and monstrous width and fast water flow making it the strongest natural barrier defense against any conquerors/intruders to the land east of it. Even Alexander the great had a hard time with it. During his conquest in 300 BC, at the bank of river Indus he stated Indus to be bigger than any other river in Europe. So North Asians, Middle East and Europeans always made river Indus as the territorial benchmark for warfare as well as trading. They called the land east of Indus i.e. South East Asia as East Indies. East indies was always a place of attraction since ages. It was once economically the most successful province in the world. Columbus once in 1492AD August tried to discover an easy trading sea route to east indies (SE Asia) by traveling westerly from Europe. But this ended up in discovering “West indies” and America continent. There is also a theory that American aboriginals being called American Indians or red Indians, Indiana state origin etc. are all related to Columbus’ belief of having landed on India. East India Company: Like any startup/growing company would do, EIC selected a then well rated term “East indies.” They found it apt since they were planning to deal with the land east of Indus. They modified the term ‘Indies’ to the old-medieval age English term for Indus river-‘India’. As the East India company entered a region with huge scope of growth potential they started to control the province. During their reign the name India got more popularized and was again included to the modern English. For classifying their colonies and for office purposes, British Raj chose the name ‘India’ from east India company and officially named this multi provincial land collectively as India and the indigenous people as Indians. In every Acts they passed till 1947 they mentioned the name of land is India not Bharat or Hindustan. Bharat is created after 1947AD only by Hindu orthodox leaders without its authenticity for racial hegemony. You can verify RSS and Hindu Mahasabha leaders never use the word India in their speech which directly proofs they are only the people those don’t agree with the constitution of India i.e. “We the people of India” and decline our federalism which is directly proofs these are the only the prominent anti nationalist elements in the name of Nationalism. These anti nationalist elements teaches and certify others nationality according to their communism and fascism.    Islam reveled by Prophet Muhammad(born 570AD) in 610 AD and came to India in 700AD. For various reasons many root natives had converted in to Muslims; major reasons were forceful conversion by orthodox Muslim emperors and lower caste Hindus, Buddhists and other faiths to Islam due to Vedic or Brahmanism exploitation. When Islamic rulers tried to depart Islamic believers from non-Islamic they used the word Hindu to non-Muslims later Brahmins used to represent their faith Sanatan Dharma. Hindu had used to represent slave to Islam so I don’t find it should be our national Name. Hindu word even not there in any Veda and Puranas that had composed till 1300AD. Now lets come to Bharat. The word is coined by only Hindu MahaSabha & RSS like mentality Vedic supporters or by only orthodox Brahmans political leaders in that time when our constitution had made. According to them Bharat was a king that had ruled whole Pakistan+India+Bangladesh. So its coined by only Vedic promoters claiming younger brother of Rama i.e. Bharat was the emperor of British Indian demography once upon a time, but according epics he was a king of only Ajodhya/Ayodhya which is a city i.e. a tiny part of present India at the south end in the Indian state of Uttar Pradesh. Ayodhya used to be the capital of the ancient Kosala Kingdom., Other theory is; it is named as Bharat because Jain’s first Tirthankar Lord Rishabhadev’s eldest son Bharat Chakravorty had ruled to the land long and long days back where exact time and area of demography is unknown; according to Jains, Jain Dharma is an ancient religion & even older than Vedic-Hinduism., Another claim is, long days back in history, the land had ruled by a brave like lion emperor Bharat, where exact time and area of demography is unknown. He was the founder of the Bhārata dynasty and thus an ancestor of the Pandavas and the Kauravas in the Sanskrit epic, Mahabharata. Vedic supporters claim, the Bhāratas are prominent tribe in the Rigveda, the story of Bharata is first told in the Adi Parva of Mahabharata, wherein he is the son of Dushyanta and Shakuntala. If you study the facts you will conclude its all are Brahmins bluffs with rare truths. Their is no evidence exists of any kind “Bharat” identity ruled the present Pakistan, India and Bangladesh. There is no evidence “Bharat” was the ruler of whole India without only bluff & gossip or rumor or a hoax. India is nothing but largest empire of Mauryan empire which was a Buddhist empire and was a secular kingdom with sufficient proofs. Buddhism supports secularism not the Sanatan dharma or Hinduism or any other religions in the planet. When we say India it includes even Pakistan, Bangladesh including present India. India means (Pakistan provinces as states+India+Bangladesh provinces as States). So in my opinion India is perfect name to adopt as our federal republics name excluding Hindustan and Bharat. As I said Prophet Muhammad born in 570AD and reveled his religion Islam in his forties i.e. in 610AD. After that his embraced religion invaders invaded India after 610AD so Hindu word came to India after 610AD. Since before 610AD there was no Hindu word had existed so present Hindus were designated as Sanatanis or followers of Sanatan Dharma which was fast growing religion by Brahmins which was promoting Vedic fourfold caste system or Purusha Shukta in that age by hook and crooks. Present India is nothing but united kingdom or Akhand Rajya of Mauryan empire or Kingdom of Asoka. In the age of Ashoka i.e. after 262 BCE the major religion of the kingdom was Buddhism. It means the major ancestors of Pakistan, India and Bangladesh were majorly Buddhist, it does not mean Jainism and Sanatan dharma etc., were not in that age; They were but their followers were very less comparing to Buddhism; and major faiths were in the race of growing their faith or making their followers crowed bigger. The first national religion of India+Pakistan+Bangladesh is Buddhism. In the age of Ashoka Sanatan Dharma was known as Vedism or Bramhanism which was promoting fourfold caste system and majorly worshiping to fire i.e. we now called as Yangya or Havan. Bramhanism is based upon social management system according to parts of the human body. They divide society according to major professions symbolizing parts of the body and certifying specific profession fixing to certain people which should be inherited; and change of profession, surname and choice of sexual partners form other classes are declined. Yangya or havan used to pyre or burn animals like majorly cow and horses which is known as gomedha (cow sacrifice) and Ashwamedha (horse sacrifice) yangya. Its quite transparent Brahmins were used to eat cows and horses after they officiating yangya ceremonies.  Its because Brahmins were using the word sacrifice where other religions like Buddhism, Jainism, Charvak and Ajivika etc. were against the animal sacrifice and majorly from vegetarian origin. Bramhanism only was a growing faith by Brahmins in that time and they used to implement their fourfold caste system with their invaded or captured demographics. Since Ashoka had won many kingdoms he used to suppress animal sacrifices in the social groups they were practicing and was giving hardcore punishments for such activities. Brahmins were persecuted by Ashoka due to animal sacrifices so they lost their jobs. Most of the Brahmins joined Ashoka’s Army for their livelihood. In this age Brahmins became vegetarian and it became a puritanical reformation to their evolution. Brahmins were very few in numbers in that age so their implemented social group might be also very limited to few regions. Persecution to Vedic Brahmins was great trauma to Brahmins so they were seeking a chance of revenge. In that age some Brahmins also invented prophesy making mind counseling knowledge i.e. astrology and palmistry for their livelihood which can control one’s life, events and shaping a character or personality of a person,  due to their diversification of profession. Astrology and palmistry became a major part of their profession in later stage. In the age of Ashoka Brahmins were struggling for social existence according to their wish but could not do anything, but when one Brahmin became Army chief of Ashoka’s kingdom named Pushyamitra Shunga it became optimistic to restore the the Bramhanism. After the Ashoka’s death, when his descendant were busy in spreading Buddhism inside and outside of the kingdom, Pushyamitra Shunga dishonestly and mercilessly assassinated Ashoka’s descendant Brihadratha whose guardianship was assigned to Pushyamitra Shunga by Mauryan emperors. Pushyamitra Shunga did not win the kingdom by war but captured dishonestly the Ashoka’s kingdom like a terrorist. After capturing the Ashoka’s kingdom he started to decline Buddhism imposing fourfold caste system to his captured Buddhist kingdom by shine of sword. He killed thousands and thousands of Buddhist monks and destroyed Buddhist emblems created by Ashoka and changed everything in favor of Brahmins by making Brahmins constitution Manusmriti.

Brahmins are world’s first recognized radical terrorist group those had eliminated Buddhism in India only through the terrorism and later by hook and crook or by “छल और बल ” for their self and organized benefits. ISIS is the Islamic terrorist group of 21st century but Brahmins are the terrorist from 185BC. They implemented Purusha Sukta by the Shine of sword and by “छल और बल” not by any love and affection or mutual understanding of the followers like Buddhism. Since Buddhism don’t promote violence so easily they wiped out Buddhism by violence and crook in India. Its the reason why all the citizens of their captured kingdoms classified according to their profession they were doing in that time. Since Brahmins (Vedic Brahmins) were very less they given social status of Brahmins to tribal priests (Brahmin caste adopted priests as Deshi linguistic Brahmins or Pagan Brahmins) those were the care takers of Idol believers or local deities or paganism in that time of Brahmins age. Since major scripture compositions of Brahmins are in Sanskrit it implies their mother tongue was in Sanskrit. The converted Brahmins are having mother tongue of different languages due to class adoption but used Sanskrit to officiate Vedic rituals. It implies Vedic Brahmins used linguistic Brahmins for their personal and organized benefits and linguistic Brahmins took the advantages of Brhamins caste for their self and organized benefits knowing it all are wrong and promoted it all generation to generation. They departed all their rival religions like Buddhism, Jainism, Ajivika, Charvak and included the faith those can be used for their faith promotion. They majorly focused on tribal idolism or polytheism. Idolism is nothing but giving respect to a tribal leader for his/her best work by their social groups. In that time after the death their was no technology to capture their real pictures like photographs so they used to use idols or artistic impression for their representations. Brahmins focused on the pagan identities of different linguistic races and nominated them as their God using a word of identity theft or hack saying its as Avatar. Idolism had their own worship method but Brhamins added Brahmins method for worshiping empowering certified priests with Vedic chants and havan or homa or yangya with animal sacrifice they do in their worship method. All pagan famous identities became the part of their created faith which later named as Sanatan Dharma by their spiritual scholars and leaders. They created trinity i.e. Bramha, Vishnu and Maheswara as creator, savior or maintainer and destroyer of the creation. Vishnu was major tribal identity of south India and Shiva was major tribal identity of north India; origin of both the identities were from tribal so they became savior and destroyer but they created a mind born identity named Bramha from which Brahman word sprang as creator. Now what they did they use three parallel lines on the forehead to represent brand of Shiva and a “U” sign to represent  brand of Vishnu. All tribal famous heroes like Rama, Krishna etc. branded U sign in their forehead saying they are avatars of Vishnu. Its some thing like dominating of lordship over the famous tribal identities converting them in to their theological party. They use these identities to promote their faith and place them in the temple for their self and organized benefits.They coin two strong word Papa and Punya i.e. sin or vices and virtues. The sinner must use Brahmins for washing their sins because they are the agents of Gods. The kashtriya were involving in violence to acquire land to get resources so without violence the profession of a King can’t be performed so without the sin the profession can’t be performed its the reason why they became first victims of washing their sins. With the 100% honesty merchants can’t do the business so they were the second victims of Brahmins those had adequate wealth to wash their sins by the Brahmins. Brahmins knew those are economical good and able to give donation to their created identities they should enter in to the temples so they allowed to only Kshatriyas and Vaishyas in the temple but banned to Shudra because they were poor and their living standard was worse than these upper castes and majorly incapable to donate them. They made temple using Shudra and even placed Shudra identities as God but declined Shudra to worship their own tribal heroes from which you can determine the height of antisocial activity by this race. Later they created many mind born identity like Ganesha, Durga, Hanuman, Narshimha etc. etc. to dominate the other religion in the Ashoka kingdom. Priests are very few in Indian race; if they are now about 6 crores from 126 crores population of India then you can imagine the numbers of priests in the age of Bramhanism. Kings are only Kshatriya not soldiers so how many kings were their in that age of Kingdom you can calculate; they will even less than 1 crore in present population. If you find more Kshatriyas then its only uplifted self claimed mass of shudras. Out of hundred people how many people were doing the job of merchants those were designated as Vashiyas you can calculate easily. So rest of the mass is Shudra which is the biggest Vedic certified crowed which won’t be less than 80% of total Vedic fourfold caste certified social group. Since major population was Buddhist in the age of kingdom they became Shudra in the age of Bramins empire which were intentionally persecuted by Brahmins by making ban to right to good life, liberty, property, equality, dignity, education, fair justice etc. etc. to Shudra implementing Manusmriti. Brahmins persecution and exploitation to Shudra was racial and its a racial organized crime. When after 610 AD Islam came to India it had no strong effect on social groups till Moguls invaded India in 1300AD. Majorly Islamic emperors were establishing their faith by shine of sword. So, many Brahmins, Kshatriyas, Vaishyas, Shudras and even non religious natives had converted to Islam by Islamic shine of sword. If we will try to trace which Muslim had which Vedic religion before the Islamic invasion to India is very difficult to locate their race. Moguls i.e. descendant of Genghis khan when invaded the India they were majorly responsible to spread Islam in Indian demography. Here I must tell you one thing clear that most of the Muslim proud to have a Khan surname which is streams from “Genghis Khan” was not a Muslim. Neither Genghis Khan was Muslim nor his four sons i.e. Ögedei Khan, Jochi Khan, Tolui, Chagatai Khan were Muslims; they used to believe in Shamanism or Tengrism. Moguls were descendants of Chagatai Khan those were embraced Islam for their political reasons. In the age of Islamic empire many Shudras those were exploited by Vedic upper castes converted themselves to Islam for only social existence better than Vedism so the original Indian Muslims i.e. from Pakistan+India+Bangladesh is now more than 50 Crores from which only 3% or even less than that are from the origin of outside Invaders race so rest 97% Muslims are root natives of Indian race those had been converted to Islam.  Adopting the religion there is no change in their biological structures but their mind changes according to their religious scriptures and communal feelings or philosophy to guide their life they have been adopted. How their communal feeling can damage our integrity you can verify yourself  by just studying their history. When Islam came to India those Brahmins converted to Islam  started to eat cows without any hesitations and restrictions. Islamic rulers were majorly from east regions where cows were not eaten as prime source; and even Arab you can’t find cows farming its because the region belongs to deserts and surviving of cows  in that dessert in those age was very hard or impossible. So thinking eating of cows from Arabic origin is nullified. Cow eating is having the origin only in India and Muslim invaders learned cow eating practices from only Indians. Brahmins were not given rights to property to Shudras, so Shudra were not eating cows because, to eat cows they must own the cows; again major Shudras were belongs to Buddhist origin, where they were taught of being vegetarian so cow eating from Shudroid origin is also impossible. Cows were taken as wealth in that days and upper castes were the major users of cows. Now when Brahmins those had converted to Islam they got privileged to eat cows without any restrictions because Islam don’t ban on eating cows. It became a practices to Indian Muslims to eat cows again due to  Brahmins those converted to Muslims. If you deeply study the cow slaughtering controversy in India its totally Brahmins Vs. Brahmins ideology; i.e. Brahmins those had left eating cows due to Ashoka’s persecution and became vegetarians Vs. the Brahmins those converted to Islam and started to eat cows again restoring the original Brahmins practice eating of cows by the protection of Islam. Since Islam has equality in their followers so those Shudras converted to Islam also got opportunity to eat cows and it became a Islamic practice in India again after Ashoka’s declination of eating cows. Indian Muslims seldom eat camels, those are easily available in Arabic world. Now RSS is an Indian Hindu organization promote Vedic ideology saying its the heritage or origin of our Nation, so in direct ways  they admits they are terrorist like Brahmins as they were in the age of Brahmins. Rashtriya Swayamsevak Sangh abbreviated as RSS a “National Volunteer Organisation” or “National Patriotic Organisation”) is a right-wing volunteer, Hindu nationalist, non-governmental organisation having about 5-6 millions members with 56,859 shakhas or branches (2016). The founder of RSS, Keshav Baliram Hedgewar was a member of Hindu Mahasabha also a Brahmin and the organization majorly controlled by Brahmins Vedic ideology. Hedgewar was born on 1 April 1889 in a Marathi Deshastha Brahmin, family in Nagpur and Hedgewar founded the RSS in Nagpur in 1925. It is claimed that; it is the world’s largest voluntary non-governmental organization. RSS states that its ideology is based on the principle of selfless service to India and the establishment of a Hindu Rashtra. The Bharatiya Jana Sangh (abbrv. BJS), commonly known as the Jan Sangh, was an Indian nationalist political party that existed from 1951 to 1977 and was the political arm of Rashtriya Swayamsevak Sangh (RSS), the Hindu right-wing organisation. In 1977, it merged with several other left, centre and right parties opposed to rule of the Indian National Congress and formed the Janata Party. After the Janata Party split in 1980, it was re-formed as the Bharatiya Janata Party (BJP) in 1980, which is currently India’s largest political party by primary membership and representation in Lok Sabha. India got independent in 1947. India is now a Democratic Nation without any direct dominant theocracy like Brahmanism. RSS ideology is to implement Vedic ideology or Brahmans ideology coining we need a Hindu Nation(Vedic Caste based Nation). It means they decline to Democratic Indian republic so need a country as Hindu Rashtra which is directly violation of Indian laws and called treason. Thinking or feeling a Nation as a mother, is not bad; even its not bad saying even “Bharat mata ki jay” till it does not have any evil intention behind the slogan. If the slogan used for any communal benefits then its the part of sedition and its one kind of verbal treason. How? When somebody says “Bharat Mata ki jay” verbal expression does not express how it looks like, what is her religion, what is her caste or the race she belongs to? etc. etc. but majorly Indian geography indicates the land or Nation as mother as an identity; but not RSS’s created mind born identity that looks like Hindu goddess. Mother land means where the mother of a baby had born. Its not the Hindu goddess that had given birth to all the root natives of India, so using Hindu goddess is solely political for Hindu ideology which can’t be considered as secularism. Its an anti national activity with a conspiracy to destroy the national integrity. May some of our freedom fighters used it to warm up them for fight against Britishers but they did not defined its artistic impression with any kind of flag its own or those they used the slogan they didn’t have the artistic impression of “Bharat Mata” and her political will as Hindu nationalist. May be this slogan born by Vedic promoters of India i.e. by organizations like Abhinab Bharat, Hindu Mahasabha and RSS. Now RSS using the slogan “Bharat mataki jay” with his own created mind born artistic impression identity with their Manuvadi ideology for political benefits and cheap politics to deviate from the root issues and unite the innocent Hindus for vote bank through polarization. Means now “Bharat Mata” promotes Manusmritic ideology(Caste based social National Identity) and their agenda which is political and National patriotism is only an eyewash. Now the secular “Bharat mata” became communal and religious as Hindu Mata not the mother of whole the Nation which is the root reason of contradiction. RSS even fabricating the mind born “mother of the land” or “Bharat Mata” in their favor for their personal and organized benefits coining the sentence “Aj ki generation ko Bharata mata ki jay sikhana padeaga”; it means they clarify they are the sole promoters of the Bharat Mata and the slogan “Bharat mata ki jay.” Now those were interested to use “Bharat Mata ki jay” they will even depart psychologically using the slogan due to communal possession to this slogan and hating to RSS. Who made “Bharat Mata” to communal identity? What is the reason behind making her communal? Using other saffron flag by Bharat Mata to represent Indian region in RSS’s official website is showing non verbal sedition; why there is no action has taken against this organization till to date? Bharat Mata is not a part of our constitution so who gave them right to promote her as Hindu national patriotic icon? Who gave them patriotic rights to the slogan “Bharat Mataki Jay?” as Hindu nationalist slogan? How they impose their personal feeling those don’t utter “Bharat mataki Jay” are all anti nationalist? Why they don’t coin the slogan “Jay India/Hind/Bharat?” Who is this non government organization to certify Indians what should be their patriotic rights according to their filthy determinations and dirty communal philosophy? Is RSS a Government law enforcement agency to determine what should be the patriotic protocols for the nation according to their communal radical think tanks? Why Government is not taking actions against RSS where their major activities are anti national and whose evil intentions are to destroy the integrity of the nation? If RSS see India as Mother then why it does not promotes in translated forms like “Hindustan Ammi Zindaa baad” why they do not translate the slogans for representing other linguistic communities according to their language? and utter each slogan to promote their feelings? What is the problem in it? If Bharat Mata looks like following image like a Hindu God, then why should not “Hindustan Ammi zaan” will look like a Muslim Identity? Why they are not making a mind born artistic impression for Hindustan Ammi zaan? What is the problem to RSS for making such identities? RSS should make all kind of artistic impression of Bharat Mata for different linguistic and religious races. She Should look like a Christian, Sikh, Muslim, Bengali, Gujrati, Rajasthani, Maharastrian, South Indian etc. etc. whats the problem in it? If they can make a mind born identity “Bharat Mata” for Hindus then they even can make identity for those linguistic and religious race as Avatars, what makes hurdles to them in making such kind of artistic impression for this Mind born identity? They won’t do it, because they want to do racial hegemony enforcing their mind born identity to major Hindus for political polarization and crowed unification by instigating their own created patriotism as Hindu nationalism, once its established it will automatically converted to Hindu State. They wants to promote it for their political benefits to polarize only Hindus those are more than 96.63 crores against Muslims so that minor community will be in chaos of fear factors. If Muslims will admit “Bharat Mataki Jay” then their mission Hindu State is accomplished and they can go further for Hindu autocracy and official establishment as Hindu Nation. Once Hindus in their full control then they will play with Hindus, Muslims, Christians and other religious and non-religious Indian citizens according to their nasty ideology. What a nasty and idiotic dirty politics. How these Idiot dirty evil antisocial politicians playing with the innocent  and ignorant Hindu followers without their prior knowledge is totally disgusting. Indian people even does not know the insertion of the name “Bharat”  was only intentional to make it a Hindu State in future by orthodox Hindu leaders which is not having any prominent  authentication after only 1947 in our newly made constitution. You can’t find the word “Bharat” in any codes made in India before 1947. Bharat represents communal but India is secular. There is no authentication of this identity Bharat that had ruled whole Indian demography in past excluding Brahmans bluffs. Asoka and Mauryan had ruled the land as largest united kingdom has more authentic proofs than others. Then why it is not Asoka or Mauryan?Bharat Mata of RSS

I think Indian politicians, polices, lawyers and judges are not so fools, can’t they see this non-verbal sedition? When this non-government organization RSS published this imaginary mind born identity with their own kind of flag representing India in public domain, then Suo motu our police should launch FIR against it, and our country’s home department should have been taken actions against the RSS, but police even never asked a single question to  RSS for this anti national act why? Then what we can expect from our justice system? If it could have been done by any non-Hindu organization representing any identity like Bharat Mata with other flag representing Indian demography; would our home department remained silent? Should we start to think this flag is our future national flag? What kind of dirty politics is going on in our country for which purpose?


Just Imagine “Bharat Maata” is “Mother India” or “Hindustan Ammi” with identity artistic impression is similar like their faiths with some other flags representing India and the followers are Christians in “Mother India” rally and Muslims in “Hindustan Ammi” rally; would our home department tolerated it till to date? If a terrorist or anti nationalist will utter “Bharat Mata ki Jay” will be certified as Nationalist? Nationalism is an inner feeling of love and devotion to the Nation which can’t be judged by uttering a political slogan. Coining “Bharat Mata ki jay” by RSS is solely dirty politics for their self and organized benefits. Their future agenda might be making of a large “Bharat Mata temple” for followers polarization. Before independence many princely states and non government, political and tribal social groups were using different kind of their own kind of  flags for their identity representations, would they all considered as equivalent to our National Flag?


In this Drama serial Neheru defined “Bharat Mata ki jay” but his definition and feeling was to unite inhabitants or citizens of India with a feeling that the land where you stay is like your mother without any differentiation or discrimination of castes, creeds, races and religions etc. but not as mandatory patriotic slogan which will be used to estimate patriotism of an Indian citizen according to its uttering, but as a feeling of love and devotion to our Nation; which was not RSS’s mind born artistic impression “Bharat Mata” and feelings they impose and promotes for patriotic certification. See the definition told by Nehru and flag used for the Nation. RSS misusing “Bharat Mata” for its communal use according to its own definition of “Bharat Mata” creating it communal and using other flag for the Nation is quite political. Making an artistic impression Bharat Mata that looks like Hindu identity or Hindu goddess targeting only Hindu community for Hindu polarization or polarization to all citizens as Hindu, with the intention for Hindu polarization and mentally conversion to Hindu to other communities for its political benefits to create a Hindu Nation, is only the root cause of contradiction. By the way Nehru never used National identity name “Bharat” in his all public speeches. He had used the National identity name either “Hindustan” or “India.”

Source: https://www.youtube.com/user/britishpathe/search?query=India

Similarity of ISIS and RSS.

Both use the weapons for their racial hegemony. Both of them demands for religious Nations. ISIS demands for Islamic States and RSS demands for Hindu States. The ideology of both the organizations is same. They brainwash even to kids. Pictures gives more proofs than words, so keenly study the pictures and verify yourself what it is exactly. Many videos are available on the internet as proofs search it. They are master in framed crime to portray their opponents as anti nationalist with fake allegations, framed investigations, framed trials and framed justice to those they hates or those hate Religionism, basically Brahmanism or Vedism or Manuvad or castesm.


Deshi ISIS (Indian States by Integrated Saffrons/Sanatans)

RSS 128292997 20061103001508601 irfan-habib-RSS Dominating RSS rss2 Rss-Members-like Muslim Jihadist RSS-BJP_540e36fa17271 2549c-india_-_attivisti_bajrang_dal w_..productsingle_INPA020612239 w_..productsingle_INPA0206129 w_..productsingle_INPA0206128 w_..productsingle_INPA0206127 w_..productsingle_INPA0206126 vhptrainingwomen self-defence-training-camp-in-jammu p04-130707-319 frpgNishaChinmayee narinder-modi-with-sword F4NT79 dv Durga Vahini at a training programme in Bhopal durga DE17-P2_DURGA_V_DE_1489433f d2 bajrangdal24aug_24_08_2014 5750_girls-of-durga-vahini-a-wo 158697409 171865754 3088353125_3772e14511_z 3088353573_9398c65c09_z 29-ND-Sangh-Del_TH_2294555e 21swords 6f188961-40da-48bf-bbfb-2bfb1fdeb840WallpAutoWallpaper2 z2o6sza1h5s61z0h.D.0.100_1327

BHOPAL, INDIA - AUGUST 11: Bajrang Dal workers stage a protest against incidents of attack on Hindus those happened in Kishtwar, Jammu on August 11, 2013 in Bhopal, India. A town in the south of Indian Kashmir was under curfew for a second day after two people were killed and dozens wounded in Hindu-Muslim clashes in the disputed Himalayan region, police said. Stores and buildings were torched in the clashes on August 9, which erupted in Kishtwar town, 150 kilometres (90 miles) southeast of Kashmir's summer capital Srinagar after prayers marking the end of Ramadan. (Photo by Gagan Nayar/Hindustan Times via Getty Images)


Bajrang Dal Protest against UP govt's crackdown on 84-kosi yatra at New Delhi on August 26, 2013. Pic: Sanjay Rawat

bajrang-dal-shastar-pooja-1 04slide4 15th_togadia_2244102f

In a Democratic country like India, where its army and police departments are there for citizens security and their protections, why a non government Hindu organization RSS needs its armed forces???


01_09160548_aa6936_2518270a 1401x788-R1231_FEA_ISIS_A 141106-isis-children-inline_4ff91c941179e766d3b43515f3b74384.nbcnews-ux-2880-1000 150813-isis-women-enforcers-mn-1800_c7148f9376f6ab67ed75d1d3f5cb9678.nbcnews-fp-1200-800

Iraqi women attend a 5-day weapons training course making them ready if (ISIS) makes it into their neighborhood.

Mandatory Credit: Photo by REX USA (2642870a) Hayat Boumeddiene, far right Hayat Boumeddiene 'appears in Islamic State film' - 06 Feb 2015 The latest video released by French-speaking Islamic state (ISIS), fighters may be Hayat Boumeddiene, who is believed to have knowledge about the deadly January 9, 2015 attack on a Paris kosher grocery,The video, titled "Blow Up France 2," was released Tuesday and shows an ISIS fighter praising previous attackers in France and calling for new attacks. The video shows a woman standing next to the speaker, wearing camouflage clothing and holding a weapon. French authorities are investigating the possibility this woman could be Hayat Boumeddiene. Her husband, Amedy Coulibaly, killed four hostages January 9 at a kosher grocery in Paris, authorities said. He was killed by police in a rescue and the remaining hostages fled to safety.


An image grab taken from a propaganda video uploaded on June 8, 2014, by the jihadist group the Islamic State of Iraq and the Levant (ISIL) allegedly shows ISIL militants near the central Iraqi city of Tikrit. Militants battled Iraqi security forces in Tikrit on June 11, 2014, after jihadists seized a swathe of the north, including second city Mosul, officials said. Heavy clashes rocked the north of Tikrit, hometown of now executed dictator Saddam Hussein, a provincial councillor said. AFP PHOTO / HO / ISIL == RESTRICTED TO EDITORIAL USE - MANDATORY CREDIT "AFP PHOTO / HO / ISIL" - NO MARKETING NO ADVERTISING CAMPAIGNS - DISTRIBUTED AS A SERVICE TO CLIENTS ===-/AFP/Getty Images

kid-4_2607419a lkoi0987

SALADIN, IRAQ - AUGUST 31: A Shiite militian flashes victory sign after Iraqi forces have entered the northern town of Amirli which had been under the siege of Islamic State militants for over two months in Saladin ,Iraq on August 31, 2014. Supported by Kurdish forces and Shiite militias, the Iraqi army launched an offensive shortly after the U.S. carried out airstrikes against Islamic State (IS) positions near the town, and dropped aid for the nearly 20,000 Shiite Turkmen trapped in Amirli. The government forces and Kurdish peshmerga forces have been fighting against the militant group to block their advance. (Stringer - Anadolu Agency)


Bhart Pita Al-Hind Ammi Al-Hind Abbu Jaan

Father of India Mother of IndiaThink before dividing India as communal Nations. We already lost our origin demography i.e. Shindhu regions where the word Hindu streams as Pakistan and some east demography as Bangladesh due to this kind of idiotic, nasty, narrow minded evil mentality by some spiritual and political leaders.


Section Offence Punishment Cognizable or non-cognizable Bailable or non-bailable By what court triable
121 Waging or attempting to wage war or abetting the waging of war, against the Government of India. Death, or imprisonment for life and fine. Cognizable Non-bailable Court of Session
121A Conspiring to commit certain offences against the State. Imprisonment for life, or imprisonment for 10 years and fine. Cognizable Non-bailable Court of Session
122 Collecting arms, etc., with the intention of waging war against the Government of India. Imprisonment for life, or imprisonment for 10 years and fine. Cognizable Non-bailable Court of Session
123 Concealing with intent to facilitate a design to wage war. Imprisonment for 10 years and fine. Cognizable Non-bailable Court of Session
124 Assaulting President, Governor, etc., with intent to compel or restrain the exercise of any lawful power. Imprisonment for 7 years and fine. Cognizable Non-bailable Court of Session
124A Sedition Imprisonment for life and fine, or imprisonment for 3 years and fine, or fine. Cognizable Non-bailable Court of Session
125 Waging war against any Asiatic power in alliance or at peace with the Government of India, or abetting the waging of such war. Imprisonment for life and fine, or imprisonment for 7 years and fine, or fine. Cognizable Non-bailable Court of Session
126 Committing depredation on the territories of any power in alliance or at peace with the Government of India. Imprisonment for 7 years and fine, and forfeiture of certain property Cognizable Non-bailable Court of Session

Receiving property taken by war or depredation mentioned in sections 125 and 126.

Imprisonment for 7 years and fine, and forfeiture of certain property




Public servant voluntarily allowing prisoner of State or war in his custody to escape.

Imprisonment for life, or imprisonment for 10 years and fine.

Cognizable Non-bailable Court of Session

Public servant negligently suffering prisoner of State of war in his custody to escape.

Simple imprisonment for 3 years and fine.



Magistrate of the
first class


Aiding escape of rescuing or harbouring, such prisoner, or offering any resistance to the recapture of such prisoner.

Imprisonment for life, or imprisonment for 10 years and fine.



Court of Session

Promotion of  “बन्दे मातरम्” by RSS

Sanskrit is not our National language though we have Nagari i.e. well known as Hindi is the major used language of the nation; Its the reason why it is our national language. Bande matarm is written in Sanskrit i.e. Language of Vedic Brahmins those has been implemented fourfold caste system to this demography for their racial hegemoney and Brahmins of the country promoted the language being their executives. RSS is an orthodox theopolitical organization of Brahmins and has an evil intention to make India as Brahmin dominated Nation as before. Promoting “बन्दे मातरम्” & “Bharat Mata” is having an evil intention to implement full Manusmritic Ideological Nation. Why “बन्दे मातरम्” is not written in Hindi though Hindi is our National language? Why Indians has to follow Brahmins order to prove their Nationalism? Its time to depart Brahmins from India as orthodox Muslims departed themselves as Pakistan.

Every Indians must expose root social evils of India like these video.

See real respect and love for cows by so called hypocrites Hindutwavadi stupid criminals named VHP/Sangh Parivar.

LUCKNOW: Amidst the raging debate over “increasing intolerance” VHP workers kicked up a row by kicking a cow, which came in the way of the chariot specially designed to carry the urn containing ashes of Ashok Singhal for yatra in Lucknow.

The incident took place near Ram Bhawan in Hussainganj from where, the yatra began in the morning. Since the chariot built by altering a mini bus was unable to take a turn in narrow lane as the cow sitting near a garbage dump obstructed the movement, a few VHP workers initially tried to shoo the cow away.
Every Indian must know Brahmin army chief of Mauryan empire Pushyamitra Shunga had dishonestly captured the biggest Kingdom ever made in Asian History “Ashoka Kingdom”  in 185BC without any war, assassinating last emperor of Maurya Kingdom Brihadratha. He was the first communal terrorist in the world history that had massacred mass Buddhist monks. Ashoka kingdom was a Buddhist kingdom. He had first implemented the Manusmriti to great Buddhist kingdom of India by shine of sword making major population of Buddhist to Shudras. Brahmin Nathuram godse a member of Brahmins Non-Government organization RSS had killed freedom fighter of India Mr. Mohandas Karamchand Gandhi but why he did not kill to Jinha? Only Brahmins had persecuted to socioeconomically poor root natives of different linguistic clans of Indian demography as Shudra by implementing Vedic caste system made by them and made them slaves for decades why can’t be they said as terrorists? Brahmins are the real root terrorists of Indian civilization those should be departed as other Nation like Pakistan.


In original draft of “Constitution of India” neither “Bharat” nor “Hindustan” used as its second name or name in Hindi. Bharat word later inserted by RSS and Hindu Mahasabha political agents in Congress party after it came in to force. If you think Congress is free from RSS and Hindu extremist Politicians then its totally wrong.

This entry was posted in Uncategorized. Bookmark the permalink.

Leave a Reply

Please log in using one of these methods to post your comment:

WordPress.com Logo

You are commenting using your WordPress.com account. Log Out /  Change )

Google photo

You are commenting using your Google account. Log Out /  Change )

Twitter picture

You are commenting using your Twitter account. Log Out /  Change )

Facebook photo

You are commenting using your Facebook account. Log Out /  Change )

Connecting to %s