Who is really Lord Vishnu? Is he a Brahmin?

Why Supreme Hindu God is a Brahman?
Are Hindu Gods Casteist?


In Hinduism which God is more dominant? It means which God is promoted as great suppressing to others? Hinduism is derived from the word Hindu which had no existence before 610 AD. Hindu word streamed from word Shindu which is a river that flows majorly in Pakistan and Jammu & Kashmir region. Pakistan was a part of British India before 1947AD so the region is also belonging to India before 1947AD. Major identification of inhabitants of present India was due to this river Shindu. West Asian foreigners were dropped the letter ‘s’ due to mispronunciation of Shindu which became Hindu to represent riverside dwellers of this river. This Hindu word majorly used by Invaders to represent dwellers of ancient India. India was a demography of many princely states and social tribal and nomadic groups without any affiliation to this name Hindu. Hindu word had even no affiliation with any religion. Hindu promoters majorly claims Shindu is from their origin due to the using of the word Shindhu about 50 times in Rig Veda which is absolutely fake claim. Using a word in a hearsay verbal composition does not proofs that word is copyrighted to them. It implies the word existed before the verbal composition of Rig Veda had created and some clans were there who representing the river in that region named as Shindhu. It directly proofs the dwellers of Shindhu must have been first time widely used the word Shindhu. Since the river is used as the prime geographical region in the hearsay verbal composition it 100% proofs the original creator of Rig Veda belongs or related to only that region. In that region only identities like  Agni, Mitra, Varuna, Indra, Aryaman, Aditi, Sarasvati, Asvins, Pusan, Maruts, Brahmanaspati, Vasus, Dhatar, Savitar and Visnu were assumed as society controlling identities of the clan. Since the verbal composition majorly in Sanskrit and other parts of the India belongs to many other linguistic race (Hindi, Telugu, Gujarati, Bengali etc. etc. ) it proofs that, the Vedic clan was limited to specific region only as other linguistic clans found in different parts of India. Claiming the all linguistic race rooted to Sanskrit is fake. When Islamic Invaders invaded the Indian demography regions after the revelation Islam i.e. after 610AD they used the word Hindu to represent non-Muslims; later this word used by the social group those were growing their religion by hook and crooks i.e. Sanatan Dharma or Brahmanism to depart themselves from other religions. Ancient India was a place of many faiths. In the race of faiths there was a war between their philosophy hegemony. Some were violent and some were non-violent. Major faiths were in ancient India was Jainism, Buddhism and Vedism/Brahmanism/Sanatan Dharma. Later when foreign religion came to India through Islamic Invaders i.e. Islam, and forcefully implemented initially to the social groups another Indian religion formed by Guru Nanaka i.e. “Sikhism” to protect social groups those were persecuted by both Brahmins and Islamic hegemony. Though Christianity (Christianity faith created after the identity death of Jesus which is after 33AD) had been reveled before Islam(610AD), there was no strong influence of Christianity till British came to India. To trace the oldest faith hegemony in ancient India we left with only Jainism, Buddhism and Vedism/Bramhanism/Sanatan Dharma. Now popular religion of India is Hinduism. I already told you Hindu word used by Brahmanism promoters to depart other religions to represent their created crowed. If we peel Hindu word identity, then its Vedism or Brahmanism or Sanatan Dharma. Vedism was not a popular faith still it had been forcefully implemented by Brahmin dishonest dictator Pushyamitra Shunga to Ashoka’s Buddhist empire in 185–151 BCE. In the age of Mauryan king Chandragupta(324BCE – 297 BCE), Buddhism and Jainism became increasingly prominent. According to Jain accounts, Chandragupta abdicated his throne in favour of his son Bindusara, embraced Jainism, and followed Bhadrabahu and other monks to South India. Mauryan king Ashoka created the greatest United Kingdom in his regime and embraced Buddhism as his national religion. Present India is nothing but the majorly old age United Kingdom of Ashoka. Pushyamitra Shunga after the 50 years of Ashoka’s death dishonestly captured the Kingdom and established the Brahmins hegemony to Ashoka’s kingdom implementing Vedic Purusha Sukta through Manusmriti. It means Vedism was not popular till it forcefully implemented by this racist Brahmin emperor. He made Buddhist monks genocide and declined Buddhism to Asoka’s kingdom by terror of death. Later Sanatan Dharma had created to dominate Jainism and Buddhism by including pagan deities from different linguistic tribal race from different Ashoka’s reined kingdoms to Brahmanism. All purana and major Hindu scriptures are developed after this period. The different famous tribal linguistic identities like Rama, Krishna, Shiva etc. included in the Bramhanic created new faith as Gods and used according to their desire with fabricated mind born stories with rare truths. These identities were not Hindus at all, and even they might not know, what “Hindu is?” in their respective age of living but they are all misused by Brahmins for racial hegemony. They are locked in temples like thieves and used for making money through selling their blessing; claiming to followers that, these are your deities or Gods and they are controlling your lives and Brahmins are their executives. Brahmins can control your lives communicating with your deities with Sanskrit chants.  Vedic or Bramhanic promoters hype Vedas are oldest in Indian race. If it is oldest then why Vedas has no oldest manuscripts those are older than Buddhist edicts? If Sanskrit was oldest literature then why we don’t find oldest stone edicts in Indian demography? Sanskrit even has no letters its own though its majorly written in Hindi or Devanagari or other linguistic letters. Hindi is no doubt renamed as Hindi or Devanagari hiding its original name. Present Hindi or Devanagari is nothing but major used language and letters in medieval India. Vedas were transferred to generation generation only by recitation till it written in Hindi so it proofs there is a shadow of doubt it might not so old as it is claimed. In Rig Veda major identities used are Agni, Mitra, Varuna, Indra, Aryaman, Aditi, Sarasvati, Asvins, Pusan, Maruts, Brahmanaspati, Vasus, Dhatar, Savitar and Visnu. Hindus majorly don’t worship many of them. Visnu word used in Rig Veda about 112 times in the composition. Vishnu in Rig veda is not defined as the artistic impression used by Hindus or Brahmins. Rig Veda does not explain how Vishnu looks like. Brahmans created the artistic impression of Visnu as supreme lord of Hindu faith how  he looks like and what are his working dimensions. Brahmins promoters created trinity theory i.e. Bramha, Vishnu and Maheswara trilogy theory to dominate other faiths through the theological politics to their followers. Brahma the creator, Vishnu the preserver, and Shiva the destroyer or transformer. They started to brand famous identities of different linguistic race giving the certification of incarnation or Avatar to those identities it’s the reason why Rama, Krishna, Hanuman etc. identities were branded to Vishnu. Now let’s diagnose who is Brahma? Brahma in which the word Brahmana sprang which had five heads but one slain by Shiva so he left with four heads. The up directional head fallen down at Badrinath now worshiped as “Bramha Kapal” to fool Hindu followers. Bramha is biologically impossible so it’s a mind born identity designating to the creator who had created the Brahmins identity as theopolitical denomination. I found the identity is majorly created by Rishi Bhrigu according to my research. Rishi Bhrigu is major architect of Brahmanism. I must clear you one thing here, the Rishis or sages were the think tanks of ancient India but not all were Brahmins and even their ideology were not same. Next is Shiva which can be easily detected according to his body and dress language. Shiva always seen in sitting at an ice mountain which is nothing but Himalaya so he majorly belongs to this region therefore he is a north Indian. Since his dress language shows he was using tiger skins and using a bull as his career all points to tribal origin. Even in Puranas Shiva is mentioned as Kiratians which is now included as Scheduled tribe. It’s now clear he was a famous tribal identity from northern regions. Now rest is Vishnu. Vishnu is also known as Narayana and Hari. It’s also claimed by Purana, in the beginning, there was water everywhere and the Brahman slept on this water in the form of Vishnu. Since water is called nara and since ayana means a bed, Vishnu is known as Narayana. According to Bhagavata Purana, Narayana is Para Brahman Supreme Lord who creates unlimited universes and enters each one of them as Lord of Universe.[6] Narayana engages in creation of 14 worlds within the universe as Brahma when he deliberately accepts rajas guna. Narayana himself sustains, maintains and preserves the universe as Vishnu when he accepts sattva guna and annihilates the universe at the end of maha-kalpa as Shiva or Rudra when he accepts tamas guna.[7][8][9] According to this reference, the holy Trimurti is non-different from Narayana. You can find different variations according to the writers of the scriptures. Which represent identities are featured according to their narrators or writers with rare truth or majorly mind born or imaginative creations. Vishnu is usually described as having the dark complexion of water-filled clouds and having four arms. He is depicted as a pale blue being, as are his incarnations Rama and Krishna. He holds a padma (lotus flower) in his lower left hand, the Kaumodaki gada (mace) in his lower right hand, the Panchajanya shankha (conch) in his upper left hand and the discus weapon considered to be the most powerful weapon according to Hindu Religion Sudarshana Chakra (weapon like a bladed discus) in his upper right hand. Due to four arms of Vishnu it implies, it’s a mind born identity designating to an identity of benefits. A human formed identity with four hands is not biologically normal so it’s impossible. Using Gada or mace and a wheel weapon as Chakra points the identity is possible after the metal age and age of medieval weapons era in human history though its mind born. So identity is not so older as the promoter’s claims.

According to Rishi Pulastya and his written Purana first human pair were -Manu and Shatarupa. In course of time four children were born to them — Priyavrata, Uttanpad, Prasuti and Akuti. Prasuti was married to Daksha Prajapati, while Akuti became the wife of Ruchi Prajapati. According to Vishnu Purana and Padma Purana, Daksha and his wife Prasuti had 24 daughters. The names of these 24 daughters are Sraddha (faith), Srilakshmi (prosperity), Dhriti (steadiness), Tushti (resignation), Pushti (thriving), Medha (intelligence), Kriya (action, devotion), Buddhika (intellect), Lajja (modesty), Vapu (body), Santi (expiation), Siddhika (perfection), Kirtti (fame), Khyati (celebrity), Sati (truth), Sambhuti (fitness), Smriti (memory), Priti (affection), Kshama (forgiveness), Sannati (humility), Anasuya (lit. without jealousy), Urjja (energy), Swaha (offering), and Swadha (oblation).

Of these, the 13 married to Dharma are: Sraddha, Srilakshmi, Dhriti, Tushti, Pushti, Medha, Kriya, Buddhi, Lajja, Vapu, Santi, Siddhi, Kirtti. The other 11 are Khyati married to Bhrigu, Sati to Shiva(Bhava), Sambhuti to Marichi, Smriti to Angiras, Priti to Pulastya, Kshama to Pulaha, Sannati to Kratu, Anasuya to Atri, Urjja to Vasishtha, Swaha to Agni, and Swadha to Pitris. Shradha gave birth to ‘Kam’, Lakshmi to ‘Darpa, Dhriti to Niyam, Tushti to Santosh, Pushti to Lobha, Medha to Shrut, Kriya to Dand, Nay and Vinay, Buddhi to Bodh, Lajja to Vinay, Vapu to Vyavasay, Shanti to Kshama, Siddhi to Sukh and Keerti gave birth to Yash. All of them were the sons of Dharma. Kam had a son named Harsh from his wife Nandi, Bhrigu’s wife Khyati gave birth to a daughter named Lakshmithe consort of Lord Vishnu. Lord Rudra accepted Sati–the daughter of Daksha Prajapati as his wife. Hinsa was the wife of Adharm and gave birth to Anrit and Nikriti. Anrit had two sons—Maya and Narak, while Nikriti had two daughters–Maya and Vedana. Maya married Maya while Vedana became the wife of Narak. Maya had a son named Mrityu the lord of death and Vedana gave birth to Dukh. Five children were born to Mrityu–Vyadhi, Jara, Shok, Trishna and Krodha. All of them were celibates and had no progeny. Here is the key point. Though the above narration seems to be decorum; Khyati got married to Bhrigu and gave birth to two sons Dhata and Vidhata and a daughter Lakshmi. Lakshmi then married Lord Vishnu. “Lakshmi the wife of Vishnu” is giving an evidential clue that Bhrigu’s daughter had the relation with Vishnu, it’s in truth or imaginative it does not matter but relation to Vishnu is established. So Vishnu was the son in law of Rishi Bhrigu. According to Manusmriti, Bhrigu was a compatriot of and lived during the time of Manu, the Hindu progenitor of humanity.[2] Bhrigu had his Ashram (Hermitage) on the Vadhusar River, a tributary of the Drishadwati River near Dhosi Hill in the Vedic state of Brahmavarta,[3] presently on the border of Haryana and Rajasthan in India [4] Along with Manu, Bhrigu had made important contributions to ‘Manusmriti.’ So it’s very clear the politicization of Brahmins race architected majorly by Rishi Bhrigu; portraying he was manash Putra or Mind born son of Bramha and Vishnu is nothing but the implementer of Manusmriti i.e. Pushyamitra Shunga as Vishnu to dominate Buddhism by Vishnuite Propaganda for theopolitical reasons. To give high status to Vishnu in trinity the dramatic story of testing trinity had created. Rishi Bhrigu tested three prominent deities to estimate who is great; which implicates Rishi Bhrigu was above these identities who is capable to examine and determine their exact powers to certify according to their outcomes. So, Many great sages gathered at the bank of river Sarasvati to participate in Maha yagya organized at that time. Maharishi Bhrigu was also present there. All the great saints and sages could not decide that out of the Trinity Lord Vishnu, Brahma and Shiv who is pre-eminent and to whom should they offer Pradhanta (Master) of that yagya. With the consent of all the great saints present there, it was decided that Maharishi Bhrigu will test and decide who was pre-eminent.

Upon being entrusted with the task Maharishi Bhrigu decided to test Lord Brahma first. He went on to see Lord Brahma in Brahmaloka. On reaching Brahmalok Maharishi displayed utter disrespect to Lord Brahma on purpose. Lord Brahma got angry and wanted to punish Maharishi but Maha Saraswati, wife of Lord Brahma saved Maharishi from his anger. Angry with disrespect, Maharishi Bhrigu cursed Lord Brahma that no one will worship Brahma in Kaliyuga. To this day, there are very few temples devoted to Lord Brahma (the notable exception being the Brahma Temple at Pushkar).

Maharishi Bhrigu then decided to visit Lord Shiva at Kailash Parvata. On reaching Kailash Parvat, Nandi stopped him from going inside because at that time, Shiva and Parvathi were sporting fun. Bhrigu curses Lord Shiva to be only worshipped in Linga form. However, there is a statue form of lord Shiva in Kashi (Maha Mrityunjaya Temple) said to be over 400 years old.

Then in order to test Lord Vishnu, Maharishi reached Vaikunth Dhama. He entered the Dhama without Lord Vishnu’s permission and saw that the Lord was resting at that time. Maharishi asked him to wake up, but Lord was in deep sleep. On seeing no reaction from Lord, Maharishi hit Lord Vishnu on his chest. That strike by Maharishi Bhrigu left a foot print on Lord’s chest and that foot print is known as “Shri Vatsa”. Lord Vishnu got up after the strike and realized what had happened. On realizing that Maharishi had hit him with his foot, Lord asked him, “Maharishi, are you hurt in your foot? My chest is strong but your foot is not so strong”. Seeing the decorum of Lord Vishnu, Bhrigu was pleased and declared him superior amongst the Trideva.

According to Hindu theology, goddess of prosperity and wife of Lord Vishnu, Maha Laxmi also witnessed the whole incident, as she was also present in the Dhama at that time. She could not tolerate disrespect displayed by Maharishi Bhrigu towards Lord Vishnu and cursed him that henceforth she would never visit Brahmins and they will all live in absence of wealth. On hearing this curse from Maha Laxmi, Maharishi told her about the true nature of his visit. Maha Laxmi then told Maharishi, that her curse would still haunt Brahmins but whenever any Brahmin would worship Lord Vishnu, he would be liberated from the curse.

The story is created to run the faith through the desharth Brahmins or pujaka or pujari from different linguistic tribal race or clerics those converted as Brahmins by Vedic implementations of castes to continue worship to Vishnu to get wealth so that the fourfold caste system will be existed till the lord Vishnu rules the empire of faith and Brahmins continue the worshiping of idolism.

When Pushyamitra Shunga dethroned the Buddhist empire declining Buddhism the Manu Samhita implemented by this dictator Brahmin to decline Buddhism in India. The main architect of Manusmriti believed to be Rishi Bhrigu. It’s the major connection with Pushyamitra Shunga with Rishi Bhrigu. Pushyamitra Shunga is only a susceptive identity that has been portrayed as Vishnu in Bramhanic scriptures as supreme of Bramhanic philosophical world due to establishing the empire of Brahmins faith in India. Vishnu is portayed as the preserver in Brahminic theology which implies only to Pushyamitra Shunga as preserver in the total Bramhanic theology so lord Vishnu is nothing but king Pushyamitra Shunga but portrayed as God. The time frame of Pushyamitra Shunga and Rishi Bhrigu is not a problem but their motive bounds them to a single destination i.e. hegemony of Bramhanism. We can see in every artistic impression of Vishnu always have the artistic impression with a Bramhan thread on his body which implies the Brahmin identity is only the ultimatum supreme. Shunga dynasty dethroned by kanava. The Kanva dynasty or Kanvayana was also a Brahmin dynasty that replaced the Shunga dynasty in Magadha, and ruled in the Eastern part of India from 75 BCE to 30 BCE. The major Brahmins emperors were Shunga dynasty i.e. Pushyamitra Shunga (185–151 BCE), Agnimitra (151–141 BCE), Devabhuti(83–75 BCE); after that the rulers of Kanva dynasty were Vasudeva (c. 75 – c. 66 BCE), Bhumimitra (c. 66 – c. 52 BCE), Narayana (c. 52 – c. 40 BCE), Susharman (c. 40 – c. 30 BCE). If we study artistic impression of Vishnu Avatars or Incarnation of Vishnu, then we can find major Avatars are Brahmins; because most of them have the Bramhanic sacred thread on their bodies, except Rama, Krishna and Buddha which are identity theft by Brahmins due to their popularity and were threat to destroy their faith due pagan popularity; so they admitted them as incarnation of Vishnu to dominate their impacts in Indian linguistic social groups as individual pagan identities, so they used them under the umbrella of Brahmanism for personal and organized benefits for their faith so that followers will think they are all in the umbrella of Brahmanism. Unfortunately, they could not put Brahmin thread on Buddha due to easily caught of fabrication but did not missed the opportunity to fabricate its identity as Avatar of Vishnu where itself Buddha was against Brahmanism and God beliefs.

Tien-avatars-van-Vishnoe-1019x1024 vishnu-ananta

0Matsya 4narasinghavatar 21-03-15-02-23-41-0 Kalki

Kalki Avatar is a future Avatar of Lord Vishnu claimed by Brahmins. Artistic impression of Kalki Avatar is the proof, that Brahmins are not only master of hypocrisy and bluffs but also master of cheating and dishonesty; it also proofs major Hindu identities are nothing but imaginative or mind born by them to fool Hindu followers; in other words to exploit their follower for their personal and organized benefits. Had Kalki came to an artist to make artistic impression of his body? Then how you portrayed an artistic impression of an Avatar as prophesy how he looks like and started to worship as God? If Brahmins prophesy works well then why all these Brahmins not made prophesy when Einstein, Shakespeare, Galileo, Gandhi, Nehru, Modi, and  TV, Mobile, Airplane, Satellite, cloning, nuclear and chemical weapons etc. etc. will come to earth and their artistic impression before they born and their invention?

kalki_avatara_by_sergey8-d7phi0o Krishna lakshminar lordrama narashimaa narsimha-1 parshuram-photo-1200x800 Varah

Varaha Avatharam

Varaha Avatharam


Later major Vedic promoter, Adi Shankaracharya declared Char Dham which are consists of three Vaishnavite and one Shaivite pilgrimages. Here point to be noted that, the hegemony of Vishnu is more than others. Though thousands and thousands of Hindu temples are there, Adi Shankara (788–820 CE), a Keralian Nambudiri Brahmin, a Hindu philosopher and theologian, a prominent spiritual Hindu leader from India had certified four places as four sacred pilgrims for Hindu followers i.e. Char-Dham temples, which are Badrinath (supporters claims, date of built is in 9th century CE but architectures shows it’s a temple of few centuries back), Rameshwaram (12th century CE), Dwarka (15th- 16th century) and Jagannath-Puri (Date of built is 1161 CE i.e. in 12th century CE) placing his four Shankaracharya Peeth (Seats) at the Chaar Dham school of Hinduism. He organized the Hindu monks under four Maṭhas (Sanskrit: मठ) (monasteries), with the headquarters at Dvārakā in the West, Jagannatha Puri in the East, Sringeri Sharada Peetham in the South and Badrikashrama in the North. There is a belief among the Hindu community that a yatra or visit to the Char Dham washes away all the sins of a person and takes him to ‘Moksha'(release from the cycle of rebirth impelled by the law of karma). It is also believed that a Hindu must visit these pilgrimage sites once in his lifetime to wash all its sins. So here evidences are prominent the Vedism or Brahmanism or Hindusim is not so older as claimed by their promoters. Let’s explore why Vishnu has great impact on hindusims. Major promotion of Hinduism done in the age of Shankaracharyas. It’s the reason why we see hegemony of trinity different parts of the India after its successive promotions. Though Vedic promoters were the initially implementer of Sanatan Dharma but its prime promoters had been divided according to their inclination to their own favorite identities. Vedic Brahmins implemented fourfold caste system to different princely states, tribal and nomadic social groups but embraced Brahmin caste by Pagan deities’ clerics i.e. only “Pujari or Pujaka” or Idol care takers from different linguistic social tribal or princely or nomadic groups had their own favorite choice of pagan deities. It’s the reason why we see hegemony of that theological identity that had been promoted more by their promoters as their first choice. Adi Shankara, himself considered to be an incarnation of Shiva,[web 1] established the Dashanami Sampradaya, organizing a section of the Ekadandi monks under an umbrella grouping of ten names.[web 1] Several other Hindu monastic and Ekadandi traditions remained outside the organization of the Dasanāmis. In his promoting age he tried to convert many temples to Shiva by Successive Brain wash to administrative heads of social groups but Ramanuja (1017–1137 CE) and his succeeding promoters brainwashed the major administrative heads converting many temples according to their favorite choice i.e. to lord Vishnu. If we compare Bramhanism Vs. Jainism and Buddhism, we can find oldest idols of Buddha from different parts of the world which is dated back to 600BC-400BC which are even more older than Idols of Vishnu found in India and outside of India. Vishnu is nothing but the God form of King Pushyamitra Shunga promoted by Brahmanism in their regime which is after the Buddhist declination in India. Major Idols of Vishnu can be found in southern Indian style of architecture due to vast adoption of this identity in south India.

450px-God_Vishnu_with_Lakshmi_and_Saraswati Badami Cave Narayana Vishnu

Brahmans Hegemony on Hindu GOD


Brahmins, majorly use Bramhan thread after Upanayana. This Brahmin thread is a major symbol to the Brahmins race to identify their social caste state in Hindu social groups, that they are belongs to Brahmins; though other two upper catses or Vernas i.e. Kshatriya and Vaishya had given privilege to this ceremony after a long struggle for learning Vedas in the age of vedism, it is not seen in their race as their racial symbolization. So majorly Brahmins use the thread to represent their race. Now question arises if Hindu Gods are the God of all Varnas then why they represents themselves as Brahmins? or Brahmins represent them as Brahmins God due to racial hegemony? No Gods come to earth to photograph its image. All the artistic impression of Hindu Gods are created by artists. Its 100% not all Brahmins are majorly artists. If we think, some Brahmin artists are there, then why they creates Brahmanitization of Gods? If other artists are creating the artistic impressions of Gods are they putting Brahman thread according to their wish or they are informed and commanded to do so? What is the intention or motive behind it? If major artistic impressions of all Gods has the Brahman threads then what it implies to? It implies all Hindu God artistic impressions are created and controlled or regulated by Brahmins to promote their race unnoticed to others. Now its clear Hindu Gods not controls its followers but Brahmins control everything in a Hindu spiritual social group in the name of Hindu Gods. Its called the hegemony of Brahmins.

837Ganesh 874_shree-ganesh-wallpaper 2799_original A-Casual-Ganesh brahmahindugod god_hanuman_ji god-hanuman-photos god-hanuman-wallpaper hanuman-14 image-of-god-shiva-and-wallpaper-7 lord_shiva_by_jazzyjaxxdeviant82-d6gabzb Lord-Brahma-images lord-ganesha-happy-ganesh-chaturthy-wallpaper lord-hanuman-17a lord-hanuman-19a lord-hanuman-37a lord-hanuman-wallpaper_138536412410 lord-shiva-48v Lord-Shiva-full-family-HDR-wallpaper shiva06

All Hindu deities are promoted as Brahmins. See every pics or calendars of Hindu deities published till to date or statues of Hindu deities anywhere in India you will find above “sacred thread” i.e. a white thread in their body which is often only used by Brahmins. It means all Hindu deities either Brahmins or promoted as Brahmins. All Hindu deities only understands Vedic Brahmins mother tongue Sanskrit; it’s because all Brahmins chants in Sanskrit language in front of all Hindu deities; which proves all Hindu deities mother tongue is Sanskrit. Upanayanam, sometimes known outside India by the name, “sacred thread ceremony”, is a Hindu rite-of-passage ritual. Traditionally, the ceremony was performed to mark the point at which male children began their formal education. The ceremony is performed to young boys of at least 7 years of age from the three varnas of Brahmin, Kshatriya, Vaishya though Brahmins had declined Upanayanam to Kshatriya and Vaishya in their prelim stage; after the rebellion by these two castes they had privileged to these to upper castes but these days it is rare practicing of Upanayanam by these two upper castes Kshatriya and Vaishya. The youngster is taught during the ceremony the secret of life through Brahmopadesam (revealing the nature of Brahman, the Ultimate Reality) or the Gayatri mantra. He then becomes qualified for life as a student or Brahmacharya, as prescribed in the Manusmriti. According to Rig Vedic Purusha Sukta 10:90 Vedic social system divided in four classes named as Varna according to profession they do for livelihood. Three Upper castes blocked Priest, King and traders professions as their reserved professions. Priests grabbed the world of knowledge, i.e. knowledge is their world and no other peoples had the right to enter the world of knowledge and they are only the owner of their sacred text Vedas and priest as their profession. King’s profession is the job of a Kshatriya and his world is to acquire the land and get the fame. Third profession business or trade is reserved for only Vaishayas and rest with any profession are Shudra. Those were not a part of Vedic social system of “Varnas” they are called Atishudras or out castes. Here Shudras are called “Ekaja” that is once born from their mother’s womb; those are not privileged to read Vedas and reading Vedas are rigorously punishable. Brahmins are called dvijas means twice born. Once he is born in the womb of the mother and the next time when he learns gayatri mantra. Twice born are only eligible to read Vedas and only can perform Vedic rituals. So in conclusion Brahmins are only the prime user of “Janeu” or white sacred thread. Janeu is the symbol for person or identity is Vedic learned identity or promoter of Veda. That Veda which holds all kind of stupid things in the name of old sacred scripture; in which it is written animal sacrifice is a prime ritual in their practices. Which tells performing cows, horses and humans’ sacrifices in fire is holy job. Indra the prime god of Veda fond of eating bulls and calves etc. etc. That Veda which tells sacrificing a huge cosmic male named Purusha; all Varna formed or all frozen social classes formed which divided the societies according to their adopted professions and created the discrimination and disharmony in people. It means, it is that Veda which not only Violates human rights but also promotes violence, unscientific information with irrationality and blind beliefs. Now point is, since all Hindu deities use this thread showing all Hindu deities are Veda learned identities and supports Purusha Sukta i.e. Human discrimination. Which again proofs all Hindu deities violates human rights and itself God discriminates its devotees. Then why stupid Shudras worship these Brahmin deities those discriminated them and persecuted them thousands and thousands years? It’s not matter of Brahmins again privileging them entering in to their temples; its matter why should a Shudra enter in to that temple those had discriminated them for thousands years? In the past Brahmins sucked wealthy class like Kings i.e. Kshatriyas and Trades i.e. Vaishyas because they were socioeconomically healthy or wealthy now Shudra the biggest community of India getting socioeconomically uplifted so they are privileged to entering the temple to have good donation which can make them wealthy. Are donations taken by god or by its deity’s executives or Brahmins? Why stupid peoples donate to god without donating it to poor?

Indians getting educated exploring their religions. Which should even continue….


This entry was posted in Uncategorized. Bookmark the permalink.

Leave a Reply

Please log in using one of these methods to post your comment:

WordPress.com Logo

You are commenting using your WordPress.com account. Log Out /  Change )

Google+ photo

You are commenting using your Google+ account. Log Out /  Change )

Twitter picture

You are commenting using your Twitter account. Log Out /  Change )

Facebook photo

You are commenting using your Facebook account. Log Out /  Change )


Connecting to %s