India is one Nation but with three major names i.e. India, Bharat & Hindustan lives in India. It means with the names people of India divided with its names. The name “India” is given by the foreigners majorly by European to inhabitants of the united multi linguistic demography kingdoms with Coordinates 20.5937° N, 78.9629° E i.e. from the Kashmir to Kanyakumari and from the Sindh region now in Pakistan to Kumki in the Changlang district, Arunachal Pradesh.
THESE HISTORICAL MAPS CAN HELP YOU TO UNDERSTAND WHAT WAS THE REAL SITUATION
The name is only due to the river Indus or Shindu or Shindus or Hindus or Indus or Hindu i.e. India is derived from Shindu->Indus->Indu->India where Hindu is derived from Shindu->Hindu->Hindustan where stān or sthan is a Persian word indicative of a country or region; in both the case Hindu or Indu or Indus or India had no affiliation to any religion it just represents riverside dwellers of Shindu river. This river was known to the ancient Iranians in Avestan as Hindu, in Sanskrit as Sindhu, to Assyrians (as early as the 7th century BC) as Sinda, to the Persians as Ab-e-sind, to the Greeks as Indos, to the Romans as Indus, to the Pashtuns as Abasind, to the Arabs as Al-Sind, to the Chinese as Sintow, and to the Javanese as Santri. In Pali, Síndhu means “river, stream” and refers to the Indus River in particular. The word “Indus” is the romanised form of the ancient Greek word “Indós” (Ἰνδός), borrowed from the old Persian word “Hinduš” which is in turn borrowed from the word “Sindhu.” Megasthenes’s book Indica derives its name from the river’s Greek name, “Indós” (Ἰνδός), and describes Nearchus’s contemporaneous account of how Alexander the Great crossed the river. The ancient Greeks referred to the Indians (people of present-day northwest India and Pakistan) as “Indói” (Ἰνδοί), literally meaning “the people of the Indus”. The country of India and the Pakistani province of Sindh owe their names to the river. The total length of the river is 3,180 km (1,980 mi) which makes it one of longest rivers in Asia. Originating in the western part of Tibet in the vicinity of Mount Kailash and Lake Manasarovar, the river runs a course through Ladakh, Gilgit-Baltistan, and Khyber Pakhtunkhwa, and then flows along the entire length of Punjab to merge into the Arabian Sea near the port city of Karachi in Sindh. It is the longest river of Pakistan. Here it must be noted as the bitter truth the identity of Hindus is presently in Pakistan not in India; its because the word from which Hindu originated that river majorly runs in Pakistan. So Hindu word is originated from the foreign origin majorly by Persians or Iranians. It’s clear both the word India and Hindu is not given itself by their natives it’s all given by foreigners according to the demography. Indian region even partly or wholly had several names at different era in history, like Aryavartha, Jumbudvepa, Tianzhu, Hodu, India major and minor, Bharatavarsta, Hindush, Hind, Al Hind, Yin, Indoi, Ind, Hindustan etc. Most of these names has one common origin i.e. river Sindu aka Indu or Indus. Even Alexander the great had a hard time with it. During his conquest in 327–326 BC, at the bank of river Indus he stated Indus to be bigger than any other river in Europe. So North Asians, Middle East and Europeans always made river Indus as the territorial benchmark for warfare as well as trading. They called the land east of Indus i.e. South East Asia as East Indies. East indies was always a place of attraction since ages. It was once economically the most successful province in the world. Columbus once in 1492AD August tried to discover an easy trading sea route to east indies (SE Asia) by traveling westerly from Europe. But this ended up in discovering “West indies” and America continent. There is also a theory that American aboriginals being called American Indians or red Indians, Indiana state origin etc. are all related to Columbus’ belief of having landed on India. East India Company: Like any startup/growing company would do, EIC selected a then well rated term “East indies.” They found it apt since they were planning to deal with the land east of Indus. They modified the term ‘Indies’ to the old-medieval age English term for Indus river-‘India.’ As the East India company entered a region with huge scope of growth potential they started to control the province. During their reign the name India got more popularized and was again included to the modern English. For classifying their colonies and for office purposes, British Raj chose the name ‘India’ from east India company and officially named this multi provincial land collectively as India and the indigenous people as Indians. In every Acts they passed till 1947 they mentioned the name of land is India not Bharat or Hindustan. Bharat is created after 1947AD only by Hindu orthodox leaders without its authenticity for racial hegemony. You can verify RSS and Hindu Mahasabha leaders never use the word India in their speech which directly proofs they are only the people those don’t agree with the constitution of India i.e. “We the people of India” and decline our federalism which is directly proofs these are the only the prominent anti nationalist elements in the name of Nationalism. These anti nationalist elements teach and certify others nationality according to their communism and fascism. Islam reveled by Prophet Muhammad (born 570AD) in 610 AD and came to India in 700AD. For various reasons many root natives had converted in to Muslims; major reasons were forceful conversion by orthodox Muslim emperors and lower caste Hindus conversion to Islam for upper caste persecution, Buddhists and other faiths conversion to Islam due to only Vedic or Brahmanism exploitations. When Islamic rulers tried to depart Islamic believers from non-Islamic they used the word Hindu to non-Muslims later Brahmins used to represent their faith Sanatan Dharma. Hindu had used to represent slave to Islam so I don’t find it should be our national Name. Hindu word even not there in any Veda and Puranas that had composed till 1300AD. Now let’s come to Bharat. The word is coined by only Hindu MahaSabha & RSS like mentality Vedic supporters or by only orthodox Brahmans political leaders in that time when our constitution had made. According to them Bharat was a king that had ruled whole Pakistan+India+Bangladesh. So its coined by only Vedic promoters claiming younger brother of Rama i.e. Bharat was the emperor of British Indian demography once upon a time, but according epics he was a king of only Ajodhya/Ayodhya which is a city i.e. a tiny part of present India at the south end in the Indian state of Uttar Pradesh. Ayodhya used to be the capital of the ancient Kosala Kingdom. Present Ramayana is an edited version of Hindu promoters majorly by Brahmins. Hindu is the name which had given by Persian & Afghan Islamic emperors when they invaded India in 7th century. Rama was a king of a small kingdom presently 10.24 km² with very specific region named Ayodhya that was not the whole India (3.287 million km²) we have now as our democratic country. Other theory is; it is named as Bharat because Jain’s first Tirthankar Lord Rishabhadev’s eldest son Bharat Chakravorty had ruled to the land long and long days back where exact time and area of demography is unknown; according to Jains, Jain Dharma is an ancient religion & even older than Vedic-Hinduism. Another claim is, long days back in history, the land had ruled by a brave like lion emperor Bharat, where exact time and area of demography is unknown. He was the founder of the Bhārata dynasty and thus an ancestor of the Pandavas and the Kauravas in the Sanskrit epic, Mahabharata. Vedic supporters claim, the Bhāratas are prominent tribe in the Rigveda, the story of Bharata is first told in the Adi Parva of Mahabharata, wherein he is the son of Dushyanta and Shakuntala. If you study the facts, you will conclude its all are Brahmins bluffs with rare truths. There is no evidence exists of any kind “Bharat” identity ruled the present Pakistan, India and Bangladesh in past without bluffs; maybe he partly ruled some kingdoms but that was not India. There is no evidence “Bharat” was the ruler of whole India without only bluff & gossip or rumor or a hoax. There is no authenticity of the name “Bharat.” If we consider “Maha Bharat” as “Big war” then meaning of Bharat is “War.” If we consider “Bharat” is a name of a person then what is the meaning of “Maha Bharat?” i.e. if Krishna is a name then what is the meaning of “Maha Krishna?” ; its no-doubt meaningless and stupidity. Another thing is why name of a “federal kingdoms” will have in the name of a person whose origin is uncertain, fake and baseless? India is nothing but largest empire of Mauryan empire which was a Buddhist empire and was a secular kingdom with sufficient proofs. Buddhism supports secularism not the Sanatan dharma or Hinduism or any other religions in the planet. When we say India it includes even Pakistan, Bangladesh including present India. India means (Pakistan provinces as states+India+Bangladesh provinces as States). So in my opinion India is perfect name to adopt as our federal republics name excluding Hindustan and Bharat. As I said Prophet Muhammad born in 570AD and reveled his religion Islam in his forties i.e. in 610AD; after that his embraced religion invaders invaded India after 610AD so Hindu word came to India after 610AD. Since before 610AD there was no Hindu word had existed so present Hindus were designated as Sanatanis or followers of Sanatan Dharma which was a fast growing religion by Brahmins that was promoting Vedic fourfold caste system or Purusha Shukta in that age by hook and crooks declining Indians largest faith Buddhism. Present India is nothing but united kingdom or “Akhand Rajya” of Mauryan empire or Kingdom of Asoka. In the age of Ashoka i.e. after 262 BCE the major religion of the kingdom was Buddhism. It means the major ancestors of Pakistan, India and Bangladesh were majorly Buddhist, it does not mean Jainism, Ajivika, Charavaka, Lokayata, Alekha, Yoga, Sankhya, Mimsnsa, Naya and Sanatan dharma etc., were not in that age; They were but their followers were very less comparing to Buddhism; and major faiths were in the race of growing their faith or making their followers crowed bigger. The first national religion of India+Pakistan+Bangladesh, Burma, Nepal, Afghanistan and Bhutan is Buddhism. In the age of Ashoka “Sanatan Dharma” was known as Vedism or Brahmanism which was promoting fourfold caste system and majorly worshiping to fire i.e. we now called as Yangya or Havan. Brahmanism is based upon social management system according to parts of the human body. They divide society according to major professions symbolizing parts of the body and certifying specific profession fixing to certain people which should be inherited; and change of profession, surname and choice of sexual partners form other classes are declined. Yangya or havan used to pyre or burn animals like majorly cow and horses which is known as gomedha (cow sacrifice) and Ashwamedha (horse sacrifice) yangya. It’s quite transparent Brahmins were used to eat cows and horses after they officiating yangya ceremonies. It’s because Brahmins were using the word sacrifice where other religions like Buddhism, Jainism, Charvak and Ajivika etc. were against the animal sacrifice and majorly from vegetarian origin. Bramhanism only was a growing faith by Brahmins in that time and they used to implement their fourfold caste system with their invaded or captured demographics. Since Ashoka had won many kingdoms he used to suppress animal sacrifices in the social groups they were practicing and was giving hardcore punishments for such activities. Brahmins were persecuted by Ashoka due to animal sacrifices so they lost their jobs. Most of the Brahmins joined Ashoka’s Army for their livelihood. In this age Brahmins became vegetarian and it became a puritanical reformation to their evolution. Brahmins were very few in numbers in that age so their implemented social group might be also very limited to few regions. Persecution to Vedic Brahmins was great trauma to Brahmins so they were seeking a chance of revenge. In that age some Brahmins also invented prophesy making mind counseling knowledge i.e. astrology and palmistry for their livelihood which can control one’s life, events and shaping a character or personality of a person, due to their diversification of profession. Astrology and palmistry became a major part of their profession in later stage. Due to loss of jobs banning animal sacrifices Ashoka privileged them to join his army. In the age of Ashoka Brahmins were struggling for social existence according to their wish but could not do anything, but when one Brahmin became Army chief of Ashoka’s kingdom named Pushyamitra Shunga it became optimistic to restore the the Brahmanism. After the Ashoka’s death, when his descendants were busy in spreading Buddhism inside and outside of the kingdom, Pushyamitra Shunga dishonestly and mercilessly assassinated Ashoka’s descendant Brihadratha whose guardianship was assigned to Pushyamitra Shunga by Mauryan emperors. Pushyamitra Shunga did not win the kingdom by war but captured dishonestly the Ashoka’s kingdom like a terrorist. After capturing the Ashoka’s kingdom he started to decline Buddhism imposing fourfold caste system to his captured Buddhist kingdom by shine of sword. He killed thousands and thousands of Buddhist monks and destroyed Buddhist emblems created by Ashoka and changed everything in favor of Brahmins by making Brahmins constitution Manusmriti. Brahmins are world’s first recognized radical terrorist group those had eliminated Buddhism in India only through the terrorism and later by hook and crook or by “छल और बल ” for their self and organized benefits. ISIS is the Islamic terrorist group of 21st century but Brahmins are the terrorist from 185BC. They implemented Purusha Sukta by the Shine of sword and by “छल और बल” not by any love and affection or mutual understanding of the followers like Buddhism. Since Buddhism don’t promote violence so easily they wiped out Buddhism by violence and crook in India. It’s the reason why all the citizens of their captured kingdoms classified according to their profession they were doing in that time. Since Brahmins (Vedic Brahmins) were very less they given social status of Brahmins to tribal priests (Brahmin caste adopted priests as Deshi linguistic Brahmins or Pagan Brahmins) those were the care takers of Idol believers or local deities or paganism or tribal idolism in that time of Brahmins age. Since major scripture compositions of Brahmins are in Sanskrit it implies their mother tongue was in Sanskrit. The converted Brahmins are having mother tongue of different languages due to class adoption but used Sanskrit to officiate Vedic rituals. It implies Vedic Brahmins used different linguistic Brahmins for their personal and organized benefits and linguistic Brahmins took the advantages of Brhamins caste for their self and organized benefits knowing it all are wrong and promoted it all generation to generation as organized priesthood for political & racial hegemony. They departed all their rival religions like Buddhism, Jainism, Ajivika, Charvak etc. etc. and included the faith those can be used for their faith promotion. Vedic Brahmins promoted tribal pagan deities it’s the reason why tribal pagan deities placed in Buddhist shrines declining Buddhism. They majorly focused on tribal idolism or polytheism. Idolism is nothing but giving respect to a tribal leader for his/her best work by their social groups. In that time after the death there was no technology to capture their real pictures like photographs so they used to use idols or artistic impression for their representations. Brahmins focused on the pagan identities of different linguistic races and nominated them as their God using a word of identity theft or hack saying it’s as Avatar. Idolism had their own worship method but Brahmins added Brahmins method for worshiping empowering certified priests with Vedic chants and havan or homa or yangya with animal sacrifice they do in their worship method. All pagan famous identities became the part of their created faith which later named as Sanatan Dharma by their spiritual scholars and leaders. Brahmanism is nothing but theocracy by priesthood as theopolitical party. They created trinity i.e. Bramha, Vishnu and Maheswara as creator, savior or maintainer and destroyer of the creation. All tribal famous heroes like Rama, Krishna etc. branded ‘U’ sign in their forehead saying they are avatars of Vishnu. Its some thing like dominating of lordship over the famous tribal identities converting them in to their theological party. They use these identities to promote their faith and place them in the temple for their self and organized benefits. They coin two strong word Papa and Punya i.e. sin or vices and virtues. The sinner must use Brahmins for washing their sins because they are the agents of Gods. The Kshatriya were involving in violence to acquire land to get resources so without violence the profession of a King can’t be performed so without the sin the profession can’t be performed it’s the reason why they became first victims of washing their sins. With the 100% honesty merchants can’t do the business so they were the second victims of Brahmins those had adequate wealth to wash their sins by the Brahmins. Brahmins knew those are economical good and able to give donation to their created identities they should enter in to the temples so they allowed to only Kshatriyas and Vaishyas in the temple but banned to Shudra because they were poor and their living standard was worse than these upper castes and majorly incapable to donate them. They made temple using Shudra and even placed Shudra identities as God but declined Shudra to worship their own tribal heroes from which you can determine the height of antisocial activity by this race. Later they created many mind born identity like Ganesha, Durga, Hanuman, Narshimha etc. etc. to dominate the other religion in the Ashoka kingdom psychologically spreading delusions. Priests are very few in Indian race; if they are now about 6 crores from 130 crores population of India then you can imagine the numbers of priests in the age of Brahmanism. Kings are only Kshatriya not soldiers so how many kings were there in that age of Kingdom you can calculate it’s because there were only 560 kingdoms in the time of independence excluding king of Jammu & Kashmir Hari Singh; they will even less than 1 crore in present population. If you find more Kshatriyas then its only uplifted self-claimed mass of shudras those were upper caste hunger and hating called to be lower caste or Shudras. Out of hundred people how many people were doing the profession of merchants? You can guess yourself…. So those were professing tradings they used to certified as Vashiyas by Vedic promoters. So rest of the mass is Shudra which is the biggest Vedic certified crowed which won’t be less than 80% of total Vedic fourfold caste certified social group. Since major population was Buddhist in the age of kingdom they became Shudra in the age of Bramins empire which were intentionally persecuted by Brahmins by making ban to right to good life, liberty, property, equality, dignity, education, fair justice etc. etc. to Shudra implementing Manusmriti. Brahmins persecution and exploitation to Shudra was racial and it’s a racial organized crime. When after 610 AD Islam came to India it had no strong effect on social groups till Moguls invaded India in 1300AD. Majorly Islamic emperors were establishing their faith by shine of sword. So, many Brahmins, Kshatriyas, Vaishyas, Shudras and even non-religious natives had converted to Islam by Islamic shine of sword. If we will try to trace which Muslim had which Vedic religion before the Islamic invasion to India? it is very difficult to locate their race. Moguls i.e. descendant of Genghis khan when invaded the India they were majorly responsible to spread Islam in Indian demography. Here I must tell you one thing clear that most of the Muslim proud to have a Khan surname which is streams from “Genghis Khan” but Genghis Khan was not a Muslim. Neither Genghis Khan was Muslim nor his four sons i.e. Ögedei Khan, Jochi Khan, Tolui, Chagatai Khan were Muslims; they used to believe in Shamanism or Tengrism. Moguls were descendants of Chagatai Khan those were embraced Islam for their political reasons. In the age of Islamic empire many Shudras those were exploited by Vedic upper castes converted themselves to Islam for only social existence better than Vedism so the original Indian Muslims i.e. from Pakistan+India+Bangladesh is now more than 50 Crores from which only 3% or even less than that are from the origin of outside Invaders race so rest 97% Muslims are root natives of Indian race those had been converted to Islam. Adopting the religion there is no change in their biological structures but their mind changes according to their religious scriptures and communal feelings or philosophy to guide their life they have been adopted. How their communal feeling can damage our integrity you can verify yourself by just studying their history. When Islam came to India those Brahmins converted to Islam started to eat cows without any hesitations and restrictions. Islamic rulers were majorly from east regions where cows were not eaten as prime source; and even Arab you can’t find cows farming its because the region belongs to deserts and surviving of cows in that desert in those age was very hard or impossible. So thinking eating of cows from Arabic origin is nullified. Cow eating is having the origin only in India and Muslim invaders learned cow eating practices from only Indians. Brahmins were not given rights to property to Shudras, so Shudra were not eating cows because, to eat cows they must own the cows; again major Shudras were belonging to Buddhist origin, where they were taught of being vegetarian so cow eating from Shudroid origin is also impossible. Cows were taken as wealth in that days and upper castes were the major users of cows. Now when Brahmins those had converted to Islam they got privileged to eat cows without any restrictions because Islam don’t ban on eating cows. It became a practices to Indian Muslims to eat cows again due to Brahmins those converted to Muslims.
If you deeply study the cow slaughtering controversy in India its totally Brahmins Vs. Brahmins ideology; i.e. Brahmins those had left eating cows due to Ashoka’s persecution and became vegetarians Vs. the Brahmins those converted to Islam and started to eat cows again restoring the original Brahmins practice eating of cows by the protection of Islam.
Since Islam has equality in their followers so those Shudras converted to Islam also got opportunity to eat cows and it became an Islamic practice in India again after Ashoka’s declination of eating cows. Indian Muslims seldom eat camels, those are easily available in Arabic world. Now RSS is an Indian Hindu organization promote Vedic ideology saying it’s the heritage or origin of our Nation, so in direct ways they admits they are terrorist like Brahmins as they were in the age of Brahmins. Rashtriya Swayamsevak Sangh abbreviated as RSS a “National Volunteer Organisation” or “National Patriotic Organisation”) is a right-wing volunteer, Hindu nationalist, non-governmental organisation having about 5-6 millions members with 56,859 shakhas or branches (2016). The founder of RSS, Keshav Baliram Hedgewar was a member of Hindu Mahasabha also a Brahmin and the organization majorly controlled by Brahmins Vedic ideology. Hedgewar was born on 1 April 1889 in a Marathi Deshastha Brahmin, family in Nagpur and Hedgewar founded the RSS in Nagpur in 1925. It is claimed that; it is the world’s largest voluntary non-governmental organization. RSS states that its ideology is based on the principle of selfless service to India and the establishment of a Hindu Rashtra. The Bharatiya Jana Sangh (abbrv. BJS), commonly known as the Jan Sangh, was an Indian nationalist political party that existed from 1951 to 1977 and was the political arm of Rashtriya Swayamsevak Sangh (RSS), the Hindu right-wing organisation. In 1977, it merged with several other left, centre and right parties opposed to rule of the Indian National Congress and formed the Janata Party. After the Janata Party split in 1980, it was re-formed as the Bharatiya Janata Party (BJP) in 1980, which is currently India’s largest political party by primary membership and representation in Lok Sabha. India got independent in 1947. India is now a Democratic Nation without any direct dominant theocracy like Brahmanism. RSS ideology is to implement Vedic ideology or Brahmans ideology coining we need a Hindu Nation. It means they decline to Democratic Indian republic so need a country as Hindu Rashtra which is directly violation of Indian laws and called treason. Thinking or feeling a Nation as a mother, is not bad; even its not bad saying even “Bharat mata ki jay” till it does not have any evil intention behind the slogan. If the slogan used for any communal benefits, then it’s the part of sedition and its one kind of verbal treason. How? When somebody says “Bharat Mata ki jay” verbal expression does not express how it looks like, what is her religion, what is her caste or the race she belongs to? etc. etc. but majorly Indian geography indicates the land or Nation as mother as an identity; but not RSS’s created mind born identity that looks like Hindu goddess. Mother land means where the mother of a baby had born. It’s not the Hindu goddess that had given birth to all the root natives of India, so using Hindu goddess is solely political for Hindu ideology which can’t be considered as secularism. It’s an anti-national activity with a conspiracy to destroy the national integrity. May some of our freedom fighters used it to warm up them for fight against Britishers but they did not define its artistic impression with any kind of flag its own or those they used the slogan they didn’t have the artistic impression of “Bharat Mata” and her political will as Hindu nationalist. There was no name “Bharat” to represent present India till Hindu Mahasbha formed. Deendayal Upadhyay (25 September 1916 – 11 February 1968) was one of the most important leaders of the Bharatiya Jana Sangh, the forerunner of the present day Bharatiya Janata Party. Sources implicates “Deendayal Upadhyay” was the person that named “Bharat” to “United states of federal kingdoms” which was officially and historically named as India and in the age of Islam “Al-Hind or Hindustan.” Bharat word has no authentic origin without racial domination by RSS Bramhanic ideology. RSS promotes Bharat because they want to make India a racial dominant Nation. Its the reason why RSS promotes the slogan “Bharat mataki jay” with his own created mind born artistic impression identity with their Manuvadi ideology for political benefits and cheap politics to deviate from the root issues and unite the innocent Hindus for vote bank through polarization. Means now “Bharat Mata” promotes Manusmritic ideology and their agenda which is political and National patriotism is only an eyewash. Now so called secular “Bharat mata” became communal and religious as Hindu Mata not the mother of whole the Nation which is the root reason of contradiction. RSS even fabricating the mind born “mother of the land” or “Bharat Mata” in their favor for their personal and organized benefits coining the sentence “Aj ki generation ko Bharata mata ki jay sikhana padeaga”; it means they clarify they are the sole promoters of the Bharat Mata and the slogan “Bharat mata ki jay.” Now those were interested to use “Bharat Mata ki jay” they will even depart psychologically using the slogan due to communal possession to this slogan and hating to RSS. Who made “Bharat Mata” to communal identity? What is the reason behind making her communal? Using other saffron flag by Bharat Mata to represent Indian region in RSS’s official website is showing nonverbal sedition; why there is no action has taken against this organization till to date? Bharat Mata is not a part of our constitution so who gave them right to promote her as Hindu national patriotic icon? Who gave them patriotic rights to the slogan “Bharat Mataki Jay?” as Hindu nationalist slogan? How they impose their personal feeling those don’t utter “Bharat mataki Jay” are all anti nationalist? Why they don’t coin the slogan “Jay India/Hind/Bharat?” Who is this non government organization to certify Indians what should be their patriotic rights according to their filthy determinations and dirty communal philosophy? Is RSS a Government law enforcement agency to determine what should be the patriotic protocols for the nation according to their communal radical think tanks? Why Government is not taking actions against RSS where their major activities are anti national and to destroy the integrity of the nation? If RSS see India as Mother then why it does not promotes in translated forms like “Hindustan Ammi Zindaa baad” why they do not translate the slogans for representing other linguistic communities according to their language? and utter each slogan to promote their feelings? What is the problem in it? If Bharat Mata looks like a Hindu God, then why should not “Hindustan Ammi zaan” will look like a Muslim Identity? Why they are not making a mind born artistic impression for Hindustan Ammi zaan? What is the problem to RSS for making such identities? RSS should make all kind of artistic impression of Bharat Mata for different linguistic and religious races. She Should look like a Christian, Sikh, Muslim, Bengali, Gujrati, Rajasthani, Maharastrian, South Indian etc. etc. what’s the problem in it? If they can make a mind born identity “Bharat Mata” for Hindus then they even can make identity for those linguistic and religious race as Avatars, what makes hurdles to them in making such kind of artistic impression for this Mind born identity? They won’t do it, because they want to do racial hegemony enforcing their mind born identity to major Hindus for political polarization and crowed unification by instigating their own created patriotism as Hindu nationalism, once its established it will automatically convert to Hindu State. They want to promote it for their political benefits to polarize only Hindus those are more than 96.63 crores against Muslims so that minor community will be in chaos of fear factors and easily can manufacture Hindu consents for their vote bank. If Muslims will admit “Bharat Mataki Jay” then their mission Hindu State is accomplished and they can go further for Hindu autocracy and official establishment as Hindu Nation. Once Hindus in their full control then they will play with Hindus, Muslims, Christians and other religious and non-religious Indian citizens according to their nasty ideology. What a nasty and idiotic dirty politics. How these Idiot dirty evil antisocial politicians playing with the innocent and ignorant Hindu followers without their prior knowledge is totally disgusting. Indian people even does not know the insertion of the name “Bharat” was only intentional to make it a Hindu State in future by orthodox Hindu leaders which is not having any prominent authentication after only 1947 in our newly made constitution. You can’t find the word “Bharat” in any codes made in India before 1947. Bharat represents communal but India is secular. There is no authentication of this identity Bharat that had ruled whole Indian demography in past excluding Brahmans bluffs. Asoka and Mauryan had ruled the land as largest united kingdom has more authentic proofs than others. Then why it is not Asoka or Mauryan? or “Federal Sates of United Kingdoms” ?
RSS & BJP i.e. Brahmins dominated other castes as their organization only meant to control the Indians or to our administration with an evil intention for a racial hegemony. Religion, tradition, custom, heritage, Bharat, Rama, temple, cow, nationality, terrorism etc. etc. are only political terms for them and are just verbal weapons to establish their hegemony. Crook Brahmins never trusted through out the history. They are only the internal enemy of our country and society. They are only the reasons for discrimination & disharmony and creator of many social evils in Indian race. Crook Brahmins are genetically liars, psychological disordered and knave race or race of crooks or criminals which destroy our multi-linguistic race integrity till to date by war of faith empire.
Only one Party majorly Advocates about “BHARAT” i.e. BJP which was a part of Bharatiya Janasangha ->Which was a part of RSS -> Which was a part of Hindu Mahasabha -> Which was an active organization in the division of India and most of its supporting leaders were dominated & active in congress. All these organizations were/are controlled by only Brahmins. Gandhi & Nehru must had been polarized and influenced by Hindu Mahasava and RSS for which reason “Bharat” word inserted in our constitution. The motive of inserting Bharat word may be for making India in to a “Hindu Rastra” or “Hindu Nation” for which RSS and BJP promote religion politics in India till to date. Start watching them in television & YouTube most of them don’t use the word “India” in their conversation. There is no authenticity of the name “Bharat.” If we consider “Maha Bharat” as “Big war” then meaning of Bharat is “War.”
Solution to our root problems: We are one Nation so prominently and officially there should be one name. India is a secular term so it should be our only official national name. Non-officially we may give thousand names no problem. It will finish the first poisoned throne embedded in our constitution. It may take long term to resolve the disharmony created by Brahmins but they can start with freedom of surnames or abolition of surnames. People of India has been adopted freedom of professions declining Vedic hereditary professions imposed to them; so its not a social evils to these days. You can find even Brahmins woks as sweepers. Government should promote freedom of surnames or abolition of surnames exposing Purusha Shukta or Varna system by Vedic Brahmins. Media should expose what is Purusha Shukta and its bad effects to our society till to date. Government should survey first which kind of socioeconomically backward civilians resides in India. Whom we say Dalit or poor what is there standard of socioeconomic status; and to whom we give reservations and what is their socioeconomic index. With their socioeconomic index there will be reservation band. Viz. we give in central-government funded higher education institutions, 22.5% of available seats are reserved for Scheduled Caste (SC) and Scheduled Tribe (ST) students (7.5% for STs, 15% for SCs). This reservation percentage has been raised to 49.5% by including an additional 27% reservation for OBCs. Here we have to decline General, SC, ST & OBC etc. We have to survey their socioeconomic, education & employment index. Suppose in a family; family members are below 10th educated and their annual income is less than 1 lakh they will be considered as Reservation Band-1. If family members below intermediate and their annual family income is less than 5 lakhs then they should be considered as Reservation Band-2. If family members below Post Graduation and their annual family income is less than 10 lakhs and need reservation then they should be considered as Reservation Band-3. In all cases there should an index to compare wealth per member into consideration. Family wealth divided by its members which should taken to consideration according to the above reservation bands. Reservations should be accordingly the proportion by survey reports as per their present socioeconomic status. Suppose R-1 Band got 60% of the population then for the current administration period it will be 60% of total reservation provided by our constitution. As we know 50.5 is not for reservation and only 49.5 for reservation. So 60% of 49.5% will be reserved for R-1 Band. Our government should decline Surname, Religion, Caste in official identification. For time being government will declare whoever want reservation according to their Vedic classification without any hesitation but regulate with the above principle showing their socioeconomic, education and employment status index. If they are eligible they should go for reservation otherwise they should be declined. In this principle every needy citizen will get reservation irrespective to their religion, caste and creed.
To eradicate war of faith empires in our Nation first our government should create a independent body that will verify the authenticity of different faith system that Indian follows. We don’t live in past; we live in present so our standard of living should be in the present forms not in past forms. Independent religion verifying body should be organized by scientists, doctors, psychologists, sociologist and legal professionals from intellectual mass, even intellectuals from out side of our country including personalities like James Randy, Richard Dawkins, Christopher Hitchens and Sam Harris not stupid so called intellectuals & polarized stupid scholars those promote irrationality even being a scientists and doctors. Every faith system’s promoters leader and organization will produce their authentications to this independent body created by government. Government will declare award of 5000 cores rupees who can prove under proper observing conditions, evidence of any paranormal, supernatural, or occult power in our faith system those are followed by our citizens. Which will be detected as wrong by religion verifying independent body it should be declared as illegitimate in our National faith structure which will help to make a censorship law for scriptures and practices followed by various religions in India. Religion censorship law will be mandatory to our Nation. The faith system & the scriptures those promote, spreading lies, conspiring for personal and organized benefits, blind beliefs, superstitions, exploitation, irrationalities, discrimination, miss carriage of information , cheating, cruelties, atrocities, corruptions, favoritism, nepotism, traitors, racial ego and status addiction, social prestige hunger & self-claimed great by birth, claiming of Scholar(Pandit) by birth and studying Hindu scriptures, extremism, orthodox, radicalism, Jihadist, Hindu terrorism and different kind of antisocial activities done by priests of different faith system i.e. Hindu, Muslims, Christians etc. in the name of Hinduism/Islam/Christianity etc. or Religion, custom, culture, and heritage till to date in India should be controlled and banned by this Religion censorship law. Scriptures, TV shows, books etc. those will be used for promotion without editing contradictions after the declaration of Religious censorship laws or violate Religious censorship laws in any kind will be punished accordingly and publishers should be banned, fined & jailed. Religion practices should be a matter of personal likeness not as public and hereditary as claimed by our ancestors. Kids should not be polarized and should be departed from any kind of faith system till they have mature standard of understandings about the religious faith systems. Polarization and radicalization to any faith system to their children should be punishable by law.
Marriage, birth and cremation should be compulsorily conducted by our Government its because here is the only key point religions took the advantages. Every marriage should be conducted by our Nation by creating compulsory registry marriage. Marriage certification should be compulsory in every government proceedings for spouses and their family. The traditional marriage expenses and unofficial dowry should be 100% taxable. It means if x wants to marry y, first he should tell the government I want to marry y then simply Government will conduct the marriage below Rs 500/- and certify their marriage. If bride or groom wants to perform their traditional marriage publicly apart from official marriage then they have to inform under which budgets they want to conduct the marriage ceremony so that government will impose 100% tax on that traditional marriage system to stop social evils created by showing or propaganda marriage system. Non informed traditional marriage should be fined by 500% of their budgets. Cremation of a citizen should be conducted by our Government to eradicate traditional religious involvement in our nation. We can even control population by imposing monogamy/polygamy but one male should have only two/one kids.
Diversity of Religions and their irrational, illegitimate or anti-moral elements stagnates India till to date in various ways and created many social evils. Right to Freedom of Religion from our constitutional fundamental rights should be removed and it should be a choice to the citizens of India what they want in their religious believe but should not be a mandatory right. When we give Freedom of Religion as fundamental right then in indirect ways we give the rights to promote the stupid things in their religion which is the root cause of all evils. If a human changes biologically and mentally through out his life i.e. the men in their 10+, 20+ … 90+ age has no same body structures and same mental ability then why we promote the same things of the religions without any changes? In past there were kingdoms and religions had used as a political tool to unify the citizens; now we are democracy so we need changes according to our present living requirements, why should we care about past? There was no Buddhist followers before 563BC, there was no Vedic mass follower before 185BC, There was no Christianity before 4BC, there was no Islam before 570AD, there was no Hindus before 700AD, There was no official India before 1600AD, There was no official Bharat and Pakistan before 1947 ….. every time we gone through the changes with the time, then why we can’t go again changes according to our requirements?
WE ARE ONE NATION SO LAW SHOULD BE SAME FOR ALL, BUT AFTER THE ABOVE THINGS IMPLEMENTATION; AUTOMATICALLY OUR COUNTRY WILL FOLLOW UNIFORM CIVIL CODE WITHOUT CHANGING THEIR RELIGIOUS BELIEFS. WE SHOULD POLARIZE PAKISTAN AND BANGLADESH CITIZENS TO REUNION BUT REMOVING THEIR ISLAMIC ADDICTIONS; BUT BEFORE THAT WE HAVE TO REMOVE MANUVAD OR VEDISM IN INDIA. VEDISM IS ORIGIN OF INDIA IS A GREAT LIE AND ONLY HYPES BY BRAHMINS. ONLY 20% OF 6 CRORES BRAHMINS ARE ONLY THE MIND CONTROLLER; VERY FEW OF THEM FROM VEDIC ORIGIN AND REST ARE ALL FROM LINGUISTIC OR TRIBAL IDOL WORSHIPERS OR PUJARI CONVERTED TO BRAHMINS AS PRADESHIK BRAHMINS OR KARMAKANDIK BRAHMINS i.e. THOSE BRAHMINS HAS MOTHER TONGUE OTHER THAN SANSKRIT ALL ARE NON-SANSKRIT LINGUISTIC OR KARMAKANDIK BRAHMINS i.e. ABOUT 1.2 CRORE BRAHMINS NEED TO RECTIFY TO SAVE OUR NATION. IF THEY CAN’T BE RECTIFIED THEN THEY SHOULD LEAVE OUR COUNTRY WITH SUFFICIENT WEALTH TO OTHER NATIONS OR OUR GOVERNMENT SHOULD PUT ALL TO THEM IN JAIL SO THAT THEY CAN’T MAKE FURTHER DISTURBANCES IN OUR NATION.
We should not in path of divide India again, but should be in the path of reunion.
जन गण मन अधिनायक जय हे, भारत भाग्य विधाता।
पंजाब सिंधु गुजरात मराठा, द्रविड़ उत्कल बंग।
विंध्य हिमाचल यमुना गंगा, उच्छल जलधि तरंग।
तव शुभ नामे जागे, तव शुभ आशीष मागे।
गाहे तव जयगाथा।
जन गण मंगलदायक जय हे, भारत भाग्य विधाता।
जय हे, जय हे, जय हे, जय जय जय जय हे॥
Meaning Explained by Rajiv Dixit (Brahmin but was a famous secular, liberal Indian patriot & social reformist).
Sare Jahan se Accha Hindustan hamara is an Urdu language patriotic song written by Muhammad Iqbal (Now Spiritual father of Pakistan). It is often rendered during patriotic occasions in India and is used as a marching song at a number of national events including the Indian Armed Forces Beating the Retreat ceremony.
सारे जहाँ से अच्छा हिन्दोसिताँ हमारा
हम बुलबुलें हैं इसकी यह गुलसिताँ हमारा
ग़ुर्बत में हों अगर हम, रहता है दिल वतन में
समझो वहीं हमें भी दिल हो जहाँ हमारा
परबत वह सबसे ऊँचा, हम्साया आसमाँ का
वह संतरी हमारा, वह पासबाँ हमारा
गोदी में खेलती हैं इसकी हज़ारों नदियाँ
गुल्शन है जिनके दम से रश्क-ए-जनाँ हमारा
ऐ आब-ए-रूद-ए-गंगा! वह दिन हैं याद तुझको?
उतरा तिरे किनारे जब कारवाँ हमारा
मज़्हब नहीं सिखाता आपस में बैर रखना
हिंद्वी हैं हम, वतन है हिन्दोसिताँ हमारा
यूनान-ओ-मिस्र-ओ-रूमा सब मिट गए जहाँ से
अब तक मगर है बाक़ी नाम-ओ-निशाँ हमारा
कुछ बात है कि हस्ती मिटती नहीं हमारी
सदियों रहा है दुश्मन दौर-ए-ज़माँ हमारा
इक़्बाल! कोई महरम अपना नहीं जहाँ में
मालूम क्या किसी को दर्द-ए-निहाँ हमारा!
TRACE THE MOTIVES FROM BOTH THE SONGS AND COMPARE WHICH IS MORE SECULAR AND MORE PATRIOTIC OR WHICH IS MORE COMMUNAL. IF YOU CAN UNDERSTAND THE MOTIVES IN THE SONGS THEN YOU CAN EASILY RECOGNIZE WHO WERE MORE PATRIOTIC AND WHO PLAYED KEY ROLE DIVIDING INDIA.
Promotion of “बन्दे मातरम्” by RSS
Sanskrit is not our National language though we have Nagari i.e. well known as Hindi is the major used language of the nation; Its the reason why it is our national language. Bande matarm is written in Sanskrit i.e. Language of Vedic Brahmins those has been implemented fourfold caste system to this demography for their racial hegemoney and Brahmins of the country promoted the language being their executives. RSS is an orthodox theopolitical organization of Brahmins and has an evil intention making India as Brahmin dominated Nation as before. Promoting “बन्दे मातरम्” & “Bharat Mata” is an evil intention of these Brahmins to dominate India according to their own wish. Why “बन्दे मातरम्” is not written in Hindi though Hindi is our National language? Why Indians has to follow Brahmins order to proof their Nationalism? Its time to depart 6 Crore Brahmins from India as orthodox Muslims departed themselves as Pakistan.