Indian race has been severely dominated by only one caste i.e Brahmins for decades. Who are actually these Brahmins and what is their origin? Brahmins are not from any other countries as claimed by some so called scholars i.e. they were Aryans (from Iran) those had invaded India in any ancient time. In past there was no single identity name of this demography, it was a demography of collective small and large kingdoms, different clans and tribes and nomads. Since Sanskrit is believed to be language of Aryans that has no similarity with root natives languages of Iran, that proves it has no origin of any Aryans theory. If there had similarity with Iranian language with Sanskrit then we could have some faith on their claims. If they don’t have similarities then claim is nullified. Brahmans are nothing but root natives from Indian demography and whose ancestors were just crook intelligentsia that had an evil intention to slave laborious ignorant & innocents for their organized benefits by controlling their brains in the name of God and religions making a delusive empire of faith. India is a place of migrant inhabitants from its different neighbor demographic regions for decades. Now question arises what is their real origin? Who certify them as Brahmin and for their which human activities? What is their present population, and what was their population in past? If you will start to investigate it can blow your mind. According to unofficial sources now Brahmins populates approximately maximum 6 cores from 130 crores Indian. They are even minority community comparing to Muslims of India those constitutes 17.2 Crores according 2011 census of India and now they might have been crossed to more than 19 crores in 2018. Brahman’s scriptures roots their origin to Rigvedic-Purusha Sukta 10.90 as their origin that define where Brahmin sprang from and how castes had created. Purusha Sukta 10.90 tells;
Purusha is a primeval giant, not unlike Norse Ymir, that is sacrificed by the gods (see Purushamedha) and from whose body the world and the varnas (castes) are built. He is described as having a thousand heads and a thousand feet. He emanated Viraj, the female creative principle, from which in turn the world was made.
In the sacrifice of Purusha, the Vedic chants were first created. The horses and cows were born, the Brahmins were made from Purusha’s mouth, the Kshatriyas from his arms, the Vaishyas from his thighs, and the Shudras from his feet. The Moon was born from his spirit, the Sun from his eyes, the heavens from his skull. Indra and Agni emerged from his mouth.
Now its clear, that the composers of Purusha Sukta were the creator of caste system. Since they had favoritism to Brahmans in Purushasukta, that implicates the creator or composer or originator was itself self claimed Brahmins. Its also indirectly indicates there was no caste based system before the composition of Purusha Sukta; its because from the definition of Purusha Sukta it is cleared that the whole creation of universe made due to Purusha Sukta.
One can easily understand how scientific this definition is. Is it really possible sacrificing a huge male human other humans can be created from its mouth, arms, thighs and feet avoiding all biological principles? Is it really possible sky, air, moon and sun can be created from sacrificed body parts of a male human? Its Vedic knowledge or its a knowledge of garbage and stupidities?
Caste System Social Administration (Purusha Sukta 10.90) is a Criminal activity by Vedism/Brahmanism and its promoters are just Criminals. All selfish crook intelligentsia root natives those promoted Vedism as organized priesthood by self certification as Brahmins from different linguistic clans is know as “ब्राह्मणबाद” or Brahmanism. These selfish crook intelligentsia were the mother of divide and rule principles. They divided the societies with four classes according to their professions to rule their life by weakening the social integrity. Vedic Purusha sukta 10.90 that classifies the different linguistic social groups in Indian demography according to their professions as ruling class and working class is only a philosophy by some crooks of this land. Vedic cons used their intelligentsia to rule the society classifying psychological & physical abilities of the root natives to promote their philosophy and to rule their life in the name of God and religion. They unified & uplifted organized alliance of Crooks/Cons, Bullies and Dishonest Traders as Vedic upper castes (ruling class as Brahmin, Kshatriya and Vaishya) and all working class as their slaves named Shudra or lower castes; those were not part of the caste based social administration were considered as Atishudra or out castes or social identity names like untouchables, Harijana, Dwija, lower castes etc. Since Vedic clan is not the only clan found in this largest demography, therefore this Vedic philosophy is enforced to more than 1700 non Sanskrit spoken linguistic races by shine of sword and by hook and crook. Forward root natives of the different linguistic races adopted & divided themselves due to their self and organized benefits mentioned in their adopted vedic philosophy to control their backward root natives to have benefits using them as slaves. Main intention to implement Vedic caste based social administration was only to stop evolution or development of backward root natives (पिछड़ी मूल निवासी) to forward root natives (अगड़ी मूल निवासी). Vedic promoters ruled the demography only by hook and crook and destroyed all rational philosophies of the land. They promoted lies, deception, delusions, ignorance, irrationality, blind beliefs, discrimination, disharmony, inequality, extremism, casteism, violence with honey coated sweet lies. They fed these poisoned honey coated sweet lies as opium to society and maintained the God delusion to control the brains of others as Boss. Since killing a cosmic human named “Purusha” humans with specific profession can’t be born; so its just a blind belief. Those promote these lies, blind beliefs, irrationality, ignorance, violence, disharmony and discrimination are the real pollutants & stagnaters of the Indian civilization. Vedic caste system meant for, backward root natives can’t be converted in to forward root natives hereditary for which they used the Manusmriti to ban upliftment of lower castes or backward root natives. Indian demography had never been a caste based demography in past. India was a demography of many kingdoms with many linguistic races without any single unified name. Kingdoms had their own identities and their regime names. Largest kingdom ever made in this demography was Mauryan empire. Mauryan empire was a non-caste based kingdom and its national religion was Buddhism. India is a demography of 122 major linguistic races and more than 1599 other linguistic races. Many linguistic races mean, many civilizations. So claiming there was only vedic civilization is totally wrong education to us. Sanskrit is mother of all language is a fake claim by stupid scholars. If it was so old, then who destroyed it? Giving even all kind of reservation to this language till to date it could not been popular? It was not a popular language in whole Indian history. It is a mother tongue of less than even 15 thousand people in present India. Either organized priesthood developed this language to fool their followers to hide what is in their compositions from their followers or this language was a language of few root natives of Indian demography. We can’t find any old stone or copper inscriptions like Ashokan scripts (may be old Pali letters) of this language though few stupid scholars claim Ashokan stone inscription letters are Brahmi scripts. If Brahmi scripts had invented by Vedic promoters, then why they didn’t have inscription of Vedas? And Waited till Devanagari invented. Those can’t speak in Sanskrit or their mother tongue is not Sanskrit; then they have no relation with this language; which means there was no caste system in their linguistic race. Many priest group of India those certified them as Vedic followers are just called as Brahmins; those use Sanskrit language, to worship their loving deities but they have their own mother tongues; which proves Sanskrit is only their adoptive language but their mother tongue is their origin of Identity. Like a root native from Indian origin speaking in English can’t be considered as English root natives like so, using Sanskrit for worship practices does not proves they are from Sanskrit spoken clan. Vedic civilization is Sanskrit spoken clan because all scriptures composed in only Sanskrit language not in other more than 1700 languages found in Indian demography. Purusha Sukta composed in Sanskrit not in other Indian languages implicates enough proof there is no link of cast based system to non-Sanskrit spoken clans of India other than adoption to this philosophy or enforcement of this philosophy to these non-spoken Sanskrit clans. Nobody will accept him/her as a lower caste or Shudra or slave to others as choice; so it directly proves its an enforcement to different linguistic root natives of India by brainwash to Kings of different linguistic race and by shine of sword, and by hook and crook, and by this kind of different possibilities. When Islamic invaders came to India in and after 700AD they ruled their unified kingdoms according to their regime name. Since they were well known to dwellers or demography near the river Shindu as Shindu clan or Shindu civilization, they used the name for their kingdom according to this clan name as Al-Hind or Hindustan or Indoustan etc. for their kingdom, where this Hindu identity had no relation to other linguistic clans those were not belongs Shindh province or Shindu civilization or Shind clan. This “Hindu” word can’t be found in any Indian religious scriptures. Neither Indian Vedic Gods were Hindus nor their followers were Hindus. Hindu identity is given by Muslim emperors to non-Muslims of Indian demography to depart them from converted Indian Muslims. There was no single identity name had to this demography in whole history but changed according to the regime names with the times because all kingdoms had their own regime names. The faith of the root natives even changed accordingly, according to the king’s regimes and their adopted or promoted or enforced faith system or art of livings in that time. Shindu civilization or Sindh province is now resides in Pakistan after the partition. Sindh people speaks in Sindhi language not in Sanskrit which directly proves Shindu civilization is not Vedic civilization. Many Sindhi linguistic spoken people have been converted in to Islam those majorly lives in Pakistan and few in India those follow Vedism. Vedism is actually renamed to Hinduism after the name given by Muslim emperors to non-Muslims of Indian demography in their 900 years of rules. Root natives of this demography gone through different religious changes with their king’s regime. Before 3000 years all our ancestors were non-religious. In 263BC Buddhism became the major or National religion of the land. When dishonest, disloyal, traitor, quisling crook Brahmin army chief of Mauryan empire Pushyamitra Shunga captured the Mauryan empire assassinating the last ruler Brihadratha, he only destroyed Buddhism and massacred to many Buddhist monks and enforced Vedism or Caste based system to Buddhist Kingdom of India in 185BC. After 185BC organized priesthood grown up as Brahmanism and destroyed all rational philosophies like Ajivika, Charuvaka/Lokayata, Vaisheshika, Buddhism, Jainism etc. and captured the many philosophies under their umbrella like Yoga, Naya, Mimansa etc. to rule the life of their followers promoting lies, blind beliefs, delusions and ignorance till to date. Root natives of different linguistic clans of Indian demography got their most idiotic & stupid social caste based identities only after 185BC. Brahmanism/Vedism renamed as Hinduism after the invasion of Islam and it codified as Hindu in Indian laws after formation of the Nation INDIA.
Many scholar also claims veda was an ancient work of one of the tribe in ancient Indian demography that has trapped by some scholars for their selfish reason and corrupted it according to their requirements. Now lets see how old is Rig Veda is? If we can determine the age of Rig-Veda then we can estimate the age of Castes by Brahmins and even age of Brahmin caste. According to Wikipedia sources Rigveda was composed in the North-Western region of the Indian subcontinent, roughly between 1700–1100 BCE (the early Vedic period). There are strong linguistic and cultural similarities with the early Iranian Avesta, deriving from the Proto-Indo-Iranian times, often associated with the early Andronovo (Sintashta-Petrovka) culture of ca. 2200-1600 BCE though its original proof are absent. Vedas are also called śruti (“what is heard”) literature, distinguishing them from other religious texts, which are called smṛti (“what is remembered”). If it was from the sources of hearing and knowledge transferred to the next generation to next generation through only recitations then how one can estimate its original age? In other source of Wikipedia says the Rig Vedic books were composed by poets from different priestly groups over a period of several centuries from roughly the second half of the 2nd millennium BCE (the early Vedic period), starting with the Punjab (Sapta Sindhu) region of the northwest Indian subcontinent. Composers of Vedas were Rishis.
Tradition associates a Rishi (the composer) with each ṛc of the Rigveda. Most sūktas are attributed to single composers. The “family books” (2–7) are so-called because they have hymns by members of the same clan in each book; but other clans are also represented in the Rigveda. In all, 10 families of Rishis account for more than 95% of the ṛcs; for each of them the Rigveda includes a lineage-specific āprī hymn (a special sūkta of rigidly formulaic structure, used for rituals.)
|Angiras||I.142||3619 (especially Mandala 6)|
|Kanva||I.13||1315 (especially Mandala 8)|
|Vasishtha||VII.2||1276 (Mandala 7)|
|Vishvamitra||III.4||983 (Mandala 3)|
|Atri||V.5||885 (Mandala 5)|
|Kashyapa||IX.5||415 (part of Mandala 9)|
|Grtsamada||II.3||401 (Mandala 2)|
There are, 30 manuscripts of Rigveda at the Bhandarkar Oriental Research Institute, collected in the 19th century by Georg Bühler, Franz Kielhorn and others, originating from different parts of India, including Kashmir, Gujarat, the then Rajaputana, Central Provinces etc. They were transferred to Deccan College, Pune, in the late 19th century. They are in the Sharada and Devanagari scripts, written on birch bark and paper. The oldest of them is dated to 1464AD. The 30 manuscripts of Rigveda preserved at the Bhandarkar Oriental Research Institute, Pune were added to UNESCO‘s Memory of the World Register in 2007. The first mandala is the largest, with 191 hymns and 2,006 hymns, and it was added to the text after Books 2 through 9. The last, or the 10th Book, also has 191 hymns but 1,754 verses, making it the second largest. The language analytics suggest the 10th Book, chronologically, was composed and added last. The content of the 10th Book also suggest that the authors knew and relied on the contents of the first nine books.
Since there is no evidences are found in stone inscriptions, bronze or palm and other sources of inscriptions which can prove Vedas are from oldest origin like Buddhism and like the Code of Hammurabi, which is a well-preserved Babylonian law code of ancient Mesopotamia, dating back to about 1754 BC, the claim of oldest is false. Using birch bark and paper shows evidences are not so old, but all are recent past works. If it was largest used faith in ancient India then why it has no emblems in historic edicts with a transparent proofs? Using the letter of Devanagari shows the Vedic culture had not even developed there own letters. The use of Sanskrit in “Nagari” script in medieval India is attested by numerous pillar and cave temple inscriptions, including the 11th century Udayagiri inscriptions in Madhya Pradesh, a brick with inscriptions found in Uttar Pradesh, dated to be from 1217 CE, which is now held at the British Museum. So it all proves it is not so old as it is claimed by its promoters. Nagari script is not Sanskript script. Nagari language means language relates to Nagar or city or civic which was a popular language of medieval India. Sanskrit is not Nagari and Nagari is not Sanskrit. Sanskrit of mother of all language is just a fake claim and from stupid origin. In the age of Brahmanism, Brahmins prefix “Dev/Deva/Deb/Deba” to it and it became Devanagari. When Brahmanism became major religion after declination of Buddhism in Ashoka kingdom, Brahmins even promoted it as Sanatan Dharma as Bhakti movement in and after 800AD. When Islamic Invaders came afterward 7th century they converted many root-natives to their religion as Muslims and many Shudras even converted themselves to Islam for upper caste exploitations. To depart recognizing Muslims from non-Muslims in Islamic Kingdom they use Hindu to non-Muslim followers and this Hindu word mostly represented to Brahmanism or Brahmins promoted Vedism or Santan Dharm. Since major popular language was “Nagari” it is renamed as Hindi due Islamic regime names like Al-Hind, Hind, Hindustan, Indoustan etc. So Hindi has no connection with Sanskrit spoken class. Sanskrit spoken people now less than 15 thousands in Indian population where India has 122 major languages and 1599 other languages. After the independence government even made Sanskrit as compulsory in Indian academics but it could not got the popularity in Indian demography till to date; which proves it was never been the root or popular language of this Indian demography.
Now we have to investigate who is actually the originator of Purusha Sukta in Rig-Veda? If we will start to investigate it properly from different sources of evidences, it all will prove, among the above Rishis, the Rishi Bhrigu was the major promoter of Purusha sukta and concept of Brahmanism as Brahmins promote their scriptures. All the poet Rishis of Rig Veda are designated as Manasha Putra or mind born son of Bramha. Bramha the word where the word Bramhana streams. Bramha had five heads i.e. four in four directions and one was upward to sky. Shiva slain the head that was in up direction so he left with four heads. A human with five heads and four hands is biologically impossible so the identity of Bramha is also mind born or imaginative. The Trimurti in Brahmanism i.e. Brahma, Vishnu and Shiva are considered to be ayonija, i.e not born from the womb and hence they don’t have mother and father. The artistic impressions of Brahma, Vishnu and Shiva looks like humans; if they don’t have their parents then how they formed? If mind-born then the whole Brahmanism is a vandalism. If they had their parents then what are their names? Vedic promoters can’t even find the answers to this question without the bluffs. Since Rishi Bhrigu advocated more about Bramha and claimed himself as son of Bramha it points he was the creator of Brahamins concept and creator of Purusha Sukta of Rig Veda or caste system as official and literal initiation. Bhrigu was one of the seven sages, the Saptarshis, and one of the many Prajapatis (the facilitators of Creation) created by Brahma (The God of Creation), he was the first compiler of predictive astrology, and also the author of Bhrigu Samhita, the astrological (Jyotish) classic. So eye catch Brahmanism creator or architect rooted to Bhrigu.
The Birth Place of Brahmins
The Bhrigus, also known as the Bhargavas, in Hindu mythology are a clan of sages, who are descended from an ancient fire-priest named Bhrigu, who is said to have been born from Brahma. They are said to have instituted the ritual of offering the juice of the Soma (wine) plant to the deities. Some of them are said to have been warriors as well as priests. The Bhrigus are intimately linked with the composition of the Atharva-Veda and Rig Veda. The gotras Vatsa, Bida, Arshtisena, Daivodasa, and Shaunaka even belongs to the Bhrigu clan.
According to Manusmriti, Bhrigu was a compatriot of and lived during the time of Manu, the Hindu progenitor of humanity. Bhrigu had his Ashram (Hermitage) on the Vadhusar River, a tributary of the Drishadwati River near Dhosi Hill in the Vedic state of Brahmavarta, presently on the border of Haryana and Rajasthan in India Along with Manu, Bhrigu had made important contributions to ‘Manusmriti‘, which was constituted out of a sermon to a congregation of saints in the state of Brahmavarta, after the great floods in this area. As per Skanda Purana Bhrigu migrated to Bhrigukutch, modern Bharuch on the banks of Narmada river in Gujarat, leaving his senile son Chyavana at Dhosi Hill. ‘Brahmavarta’ – is well known as the region of Brahmans. The conduct handed down from generation to generation among the social classes and the intermediate classes of that land is called the ‘conduct of good people’. Kuruksetra and the lands of the Matsyas, Pancalas, and Surasenakas constitute the ‘land of Brahmin seers’, which borders on the Brahmavarta. According to them all the people on earth should learn their respective practices from a Brahmin born in that land.
According to some scholars the Bhargava community were originally known as Dhusars and were a trading caste (bania or vaishya). During the later part of the 19th century they successfully engineered a rise to the status of brahmin using a process sometimes termed sanskritisation.
As said above Manusmriti had only implemented by a dishonest and disloyal Brahmin Pushyamitra Shunga to non-caste Buddhist empire of Ashoka in 185 – c. 149 BCE; so it points Bhrigu was an active character that had implemented Brahmanism with Pushyamitra Shunga to Ashoka empire dividing the Buddhist society to four castes according to the social profession they had doing in the time of implementation. Tribal priests from different linguistic races became Brahmins and after that they are privileged to learn Veda for officiating Vedic rituals. Kings or Tribal chiefs got the certification of Kshatriyas. Merchants or Business group certified as Vashiyas and working class certified as Shudras or slaves. Pushyamitra Shunga was belongs to vedic Brahmins so it is not something like that all the unified kingdoms of Ahoka was filled with their clans. Ashoka kingdom was a Buddhist kingdom and Ashoka’s father Bimbisara was a follower and promoter of Ajivika and Lokayat like faith and had inclination to Buddhism so there was no sign of Brahmanism in Buddhist empire of Ashoka as a major faith in any kind. Brahmanism is nothing but organized priesthood promoting Vedic principles of Pushyamitra Shunga with Brahmins code “Manusmriti.” It had all done by the dishonest Brahmin army chief Pushyamitra Shunga of Ashoka empire and Rishi Bhrigu with his Purusha Sukta classification of society according to body parts of the human. Dividing and designating professional class was solely done by the human and master mind was only Rishi Bhrigu as official. Brahmins only had designated to which professional class will be designated to which body parts as social class. According to their psychology, mouth was the expression part of the mind, so he took favoritism to that part of the body and made them supreme as Brahmins those sprang from Purusha’s mouth. It is clearly described Brahmins are born from mouth in Rig-vedic Purushs-Sukta; but in truth, if Sanskrit chants were created by propagation of sound by mouth, except the chants only two things basically produced by mouth i.e. one is spit (थूक) and another is vomit (उलटी ). According to their theory Brahmins are the wastes of the undigested foods or blood vomit due to diseases or wastage of saliva/phlegm from the mouth.
Since tribal priest were worshiping their own tribal deities, their deities are included as Avatars to their faith to destroy Buddhism from the land. They included many tribal famous identities as their part to dominate other faiths. Bramha and Vishnu were their own created imaginative identities that has been flattered with imaginative and mind born features and powers. Shiva was a tribal identity from Himalayan demography as kiratians, now their tribe included as Scheduled tribes or Vedic Atishudra caste. Since they were representing the Bramha or Brahman so Bramha became the creator God and other two became as maintainer and destroyer. These were initially included as prime God of their faith system. Many famous pagan identities like Krishna, Rama, Hanuman etc. are included later as Avatars of these Trinity or other prime God according to their popularity. Avatar word used for identity trap or theft by Brahmins to fool their followers. They say these are your Gods and we are their executives. So in this way they had created the empire of faith i.e. Santana Dharma or Hinduism using the pagan identities from different tribal linguistic race to control the whole land and to make wealth. Major adoptee Brahmins later linked themselves to composers of Vedas and other famous Rishis those had contribution to Vedism as their Gotra. Due to highest status and lucrative reservations for Brahmins in the age of Brahmins, many clever/knave/cons from different linguistic races even had attracted to this class and converted themselves to Brahmins with backdoor opportunity and sycophancy chance. Its the reason why you can find different variations of Brahmins in India. In very simple definition some clever or knave humans created the social group according to the profession and socioeconomic standard to get benefits from them according to their socioeconomic order. Brahmins made them in number one position because it had created by them and wanted to have wealth and fame or high social position without labor in the name of God or being an agent to God. Now question arises how they can make wealth without any labor? So they choose themselves as agent of god with profession of teacher and acted as royal adviser to king class. Their prime source of income without any harm was from Kings therefore they name them Kshatriya or the maker of Kshatra or lands those own major resources of the acquired land. Kings goes to war and acquire resources but majorly controlled by the royal advisers those are more secured than even a King. King may killed in the war but adviser will be the same to other succeeded king. Second target class was Businessmen or Vaishyas those make money in the society after the King class. They knew with 100% honesty business can’t be done so they coined the word vice and virtue i.e. Pap and Punya, Hell and Heaven. Dishonesty in business, means its a sin or “Pap” in that case Brahmins acted as sin washer-man for which they have to do some holey ritual to wash their sins. Holey “sin washing” rituals costs to sinner so in that way they made money. So, many ways they created to make money without getting in to harm by controlling the two upper castes. Initially they had banned to both these Kshatriya and Vaishyas learning Vedas with a fear that they can adopt their profession but due to strong oppositions they privileged to learn them Veda but restricted them to be a professional as priest, teacher and adviser, which was majorly reserved by them to protect their inherited profession. The rest class those were majorly poor they were intentionally put in to poor and ignorant to extract services from them as slaves and named them Shudra. It means, some crooks and cunning humans one of our ancestral linguistic races had divided all linguistic social groups found in Indian demography according to the major body parts of a Man designating major social professions to them for controlling their brain and life for their personal and organized benefits. Its the reason why they made themselves supreme as Brahmin and said they sprang from Purusha’s mouth. Second Varna i.e. Kshatriyas are created from Purusha’s arms. Merchants were created from Purusha’s thighs and rest all social professionals are created from Purusha’s feet as Shudra.
Scientifically if we will observe the case then we can say, some humans misused the “conformity” to control a social crowd according to their own enforced protocols as per their own evil ways. It means Brahmins created Purusha sukta to control the social group according to their ways for their personal and organized benefits. Since their creation theory is unscientific, illogical, irrational and baseless or based on lies, the promotion of the theory generation to generation implies its a crime done by these peoples to exploit their trapped social groups, and other social groups according to their evil desires. Its the reason why Brahmanism is nothing but a racial organized crime. They wanted to freeze some professions that is priesthood, kingship and trading creating Varna or castes so that peoples with other professions can’t compete with their descendants and they only will profess these professions hereditary reserved by their surnames.