Indian race has been severely dominated by only one caste i.e Brahmin. Who are actually Brahmins and what is their origin? Brahmins are not from any other countries as said by some scholars as Arayans (from Iran) those were invaded to India in any ancient time. If it is then they are also inhabitant to this region for being a native to this land. Now question arises what is its real origin? Who certify them as Brahmin and for which human activities? What is there population now and what was their population in past? If you will start to investigate it can blow your mind. According to unofficial sources now Brahmins population in India is approximately maximum 6 cores from 130 crores. They are even minority community comparing to Muslims of India those constitutes 17.2 Crores according 2011 census of India and now may cross to 19 crores in 2017. Brahmins literature roots thier origin to Rigvedic-Purusha Sukta 10.90 as their origin that define where Brahmin sprang from and how castes had created. Now its clear the writers of Purusha Sukta were the creator of caste system and favoritism to Brahmans in Purushasukta implicates the creator or composer or originator itself was self claimed Brahmins. Its also indirectly says before that there was no castes and there was no special class like Brahmins and other three castes. Many scholar also claim veda was an ancient work of one of the tribe in ancient Indian demography that has trapped by some scholars for their selfish reason and corrupted it according to their requirements which again pointing to these Brahmin claimed scholars. Now lets see how old is Rig Veda is? If we can determine the age of Rig-Veda then we can estimate the age of Castes by Brahmins and even age of Brahmins caste. According to Wikipedia sources Rigveda was composed in the North-Western region of the Indian subcontinent, roughly between 1700–1100 BCE (the early Vedic period). There are strong linguistic and cultural similarities with the early Iranian Avesta, deriving from the Proto-Indo-Iranian times, often associated with the early Andronovo (Sintashta-Petrovka) culture of ca. 2200-1600 BCE though its original proof are absent. Vedas are also called śruti (“what is heard”) literature, distinguishing them from other religious texts, which are called smṛti (“what is remembered”). If it was from the sources of hearing and knowledge transferred to the next generation to next generation through only recitations then how one can estimate its original age? In other source of Wikipedia says the Rig Vedic books were composed by poets from different priestly groups over a period of several centuries from roughly the second half of the 2nd millennium BCE (the early Vedic period), starting with the Punjab (Sapta Sindhu) region of the northwest Indian subcontinent.
Tradition associates a rishi (the composer) with each ṛc of the Rigveda. Most sūktas are attributed to single composers. The “family books” (2–7) are so-called because they have hymns by members of the same clan in each book; but other clans are also represented in the Rigveda. In all, 10 families of Rishis account for more than 95% of the ṛcs; for each of them the Rigveda includes a lineage-specific āprī hymn (a special sūkta of rigidly formulaic structure, used for rituals.)
|Angiras||I.142||3619 (especially Mandala 6)|
|Kanva||I.13||1315 (especially Mandala 8)|
|Vasishtha||VII.2||1276 (Mandala 7)|
|Vishvamitra||III.4||983 (Mandala 3)|
|Atri||V.5||885 (Mandala 5)|
|Kashyapa||IX.5||415 (part of Mandala 9)|
|Grtsamada||II.3||401 (Mandala 2)|
There are, 30 manuscripts of Rigveda at the Bhandarkar Oriental Research Institute, collected in the 19th century by Georg Bühler, Franz Kielhorn and others, originating from different parts of India, including Kashmir, Gujarat, the then Rajaputana, Central Provinces etc. They were transferred to Deccan College, Pune, in the late 19th century. They are in the Sharada and Devanagari scripts, written on birch bark and paper. The oldest of them is dated to 1464AD. The 30 manuscripts of Rigveda preserved at the Bhandarkar Oriental Research Institute, Pune were added to UNESCO‘s Memory of the World Register in 2007. The first mandala is the largest, with 191 hymns and 2,006 hymns, and it was added to the text after Books 2 through 9. The last, or the 10th Book, also has 191 hymns but 1,754 verses, making it the second largest. The language analytics suggest the 10th Book, chronologically, was composed and added last. The content of the 10th Book also suggest that the authors knew and relied on the contents of the first nine books.
Since there is no evidences are found in stone inscriptions, bronze or palm and other source of inscriptions which can proof Vedas are from oldest origin like Buddhism and like the Code of Hammurabi, which is a well-preserved Babylonian law code of ancient Mesopotamia, dating back to about 1754 BC, the claim of oldest is false. Using birch bark and paper shows evidences are not so old, but all are recent past works. If it was largest used faith in ancient India then why it has no emblems in historic edicts with a transparent proof? Using the letter of Devanagari shows the Vedic culture had not even developed there own letters. The use of Sanskrit in “Nagari” script in medieval India is attested by numerous pillar and cave temple inscriptions, including the 11th century Udayagiri inscriptions in Madhya Pradesh, a brick with inscriptions found in Uttar Pradesh, dated to be from 1217 CE, which is now held at the British Museum. So it all proofs it is not so old as it is claimed by its promoters. Nagari script is not Sanskript script. Nagari language means language relates to Nagar or city or civic which was a popular language of medieval India. Sanskrit is not Nagari and Nagari is not Sanskrit. Sanskrit of mother of all language is just a fake claim and from stupid origin. In the age of Brahmanism Brahmins prefix “Dev/Deva” to it and it became Devanagari. When Brahmanism became major religion after declination of Buddhism in Ashoka kingdom Brahmins even promoted as Sanatan Dharma. When Islamic Invaders came afterward 7th century they converted many root-natives to their religion as Muslims and some many Shudra even converted themselves to Islam for upper caste exploitation. To depart recognizing Muslims from non-Muslims in Islamic Kingdom they use Hindu to non-Muslim followers and this Hindu word mostly represented to Brahmanism or Brahmins promoted Vedism or Santan Dharm. Since major popular language was “Nagari” it is renamed as Hindi. So Hindi has no connection with Sanskrit spoken class. Sanskrit spoken people now less than 15 thousands in Indian population where India has 122 major languages and 1600 other languages. After the independence government even made it compulsory in Indian academic but it could not got the popular in Indian demography till to date shows its not the root language.
Now we have to investigate who is actually the originator of Purusha Sukta in Rig-Veda? If we will start to investigate it properly from different sources of evidences, it all will proof, among the above Rishis, the Rishi Bhrigu was the major promoter of Purusha sukta and concept of Brahmanism as Brahmins promote their scriptures. All the poet Rishis of Rig Veda are designated as Manasha Putra or mind born son of Bramha. Bramha the word where the word Bramhana streams. Bramha had five heads i.e. four in four directions and one was upward to sky. Shiva slain the head that was in up direction so he left with four heads. A human with five heads and four hands is biologically impossible so the identity of Bramha is also mind born or imaginative. The Trimurti in Brahmanism i.e. Brahma, Vishnu and Shiva are considered to be ayonija, i.e not born from the womb and hence they don’t have mother and father. The artistic impressions of Brahma, Vishnu and Shiva looks like humans; if they don’t have their parents then how they formed? If mind-born then the whole Brahmanism is a vandalism. If they had their parents then what are their names? Vedic promoters can’t even find the answers to this question without the bluffs. Since Rishi Bhrigu advocated more about Bramha and claimed himself as son of Bramha it points he was the creator of Brahamin concept and creator of Purusha Sukta of Rig Veda or caste system as official and literal initiation. Bhrigu was one of the seven sages, the Saptarshis, and one of the many Prajapatis (the facilitators of Creation) created by Brahma (The God of Creation), he was the first compiler of predictive astrology, and also the author of Bhrigu Samhita, the astrological (Jyotish) classic. So eye catch Brahmanism creator rooted to Bhrigu.
The Birth Place of Brahmins
The Bhrigus, also known as the Bhargavas, in Hindu mythology are a clan of sages, who are descended from an ancient fire-priest named Bhrigu, who is said to have been born from Brahma. They are said to have instituted the ritual of offering the juice of the Soma plant to the deities. Some of them are said to have been warriors as well as priests. The Bhrigus are intimately linked with the composition of the Atharva-Veda and Rig Veda. The gotras Vatsa, Bida, Arshtisena, Daivodasa, and Shaunaka even belongs to the Bhrigu clan.
According to Manusmriti, Bhrigu was a compatriot of and lived during the time of Manu, the Hindu progenitor of humanity. Bhrigu had his Ashram (Hermitage) on the Vadhusar River, a tributary of the Drishadwati River near Dhosi Hill in the Vedic state of Brahmavarta, presently on the border of Haryana and Rajasthan in India  Along with Manu, Bhrigu had made important contributions to ‘Manusmriti‘, which was constituted out of a sermon to a congregation of saints in the state of Brahmavarta, after the great floods in this area. As per Skanda Purana Bhrigu migrated to Bhrigukutch, modern Bharuch on the banks of Narmada river in Gujarat, leaving his senile son Chyavana at Dhosi Hill. ‘Brahmavarta’ – is well known as the region of Brahmans. The conduct handed down from generation to generation among the social classes and the intermediate classes of that land is called the ‘conduct of good people’. Kuruksetra and the lands of the Matsyas, Pancalas, and Surasenakas constitute the ‘land of Brahmin seers’, which borders on the Brahmavarta. According to them all the people on earth should learn their respective practices from a Brahmin born in that land.[a]
According to some scholars the Bhargava community were originally known as Dhusars and were a trading caste (bania or vaishya). During the later part of the 19th century they successfully engineered a rise to the status of brahmin using a process sometimes termed sanskritisation.
Manusmriti had implemented by a dishonest and disloyal Brahmin Pushyamitra Shunga to non-caste Buddhist empire of Ashoka in 185 – c. 149 BCE; so it points Bhrigu was an active character that had implemented Brahmanism with Pushyamitra Shunga to Ashoka empire dividing the Buddhist society to four castes according to the social profession they had doing in the time of implementation. Tribal priests from different linguistic races became Brahmins and after that they are privileged to learn Veda for officiating Vedic rituals. Kings or Tribal chiefs got the certification of Kshatriyas. Merchants or Business group certified as Vashiyas and working class certified as Shudras or slaves. Pushyamitra Shunga was belongs to vedic Brahmins so it is not something like that all the unified kingdoms of Ahoka was filled with their clans. Ashoka kingdom was a Buddhist kingdom and Ashoka’s father Bimbisara was a follower and promoter of Ajivika and had inclination to Buddhism so there was no sign of Brahmanism in Buddhist empire of Ashoka as a major faith in any kind. Brahminism is nothing but organized priesthood promoting Vedic principles of Pushyamitra Shunga with Brahmins code “Manusmriti.” It had all done by the dishonest Brahmin army chief Pushyamitra Shunga of Ashoka empire and Rishi Bhrigu with his Purusha Sukta classification of society according to body parts of the human. Dividing and designating professional class was solely done by the human and master mind was only Rishi Bhrigu as official. Brahmins only had designated to which professional class will be designated to which body parts as social class. According to their psychology, mouth was the expression part of mind, so he took favoritism to that part of the body and made them supreme as Brahmins those sprang from Purusha’s mouth. It is clearly described Brahmins are born from mouth in Rig-vedic Purushs-Sukta; but in truth, if Sanskrit chants were created by propagation of sound by mouth, except the chants only two things basically produced by mouth i.e. one is spit (थूक) and another is vomit (उलटी ). According to their theory Brahmins are the wastes of the undigested foods or blood vomit due to diseases or wastage of saliva/phlegm from the mouth.
Since tribal priest were worshiping their own tribal deities, their deities are included as Avatars to their faith to destroy Buddhism from the land. They included many tribal famous identities as their part to dominate other faiths. Bramha and Vishnu were their own created imaginative identities that has been flattered with imaginative and mind born features and powers. Shiva was a tribal identity from Himalayan demography as kiratians, now their tribe included as Scheduled tribes or Vedic Atishudra caste. Since they were representing the Bramha or Brahman so Bramha became the creator God and other two became as maintainer and destroyer. These were initially included as prime God of their faith system. Many famous pagan identities like Krishna, Rama, Hanuman etc. are included later as Avatars of these Trinity or other prime God according to their popularity. Avatar word used for identity trap or theft by Brahmins to fool their followers. They say these are your Gods and we are their executives. So in this way they had created the empire of faith i.e. Santana Dharma or Hinduism using the pagan identities from different tribal linguistic race to control the whole land and to make wealth. Major adoptee Brahmins later linked themselves to composers of Vedas and other famous Rishis those had contribution to Vedism as their Gotra. Due to highest status and lucrative reservations for Brahmins in the age of Brahmins, many clever/knave/cons from different linguistic races even had attracted to this class and converted themselves to Brahmins with backdoor opportunity and sycophancy chance. Its the reason why you can find different variations of Brahmins in India. In very simple definition some clever or knave humans created the social group according to the profession and socioeconomic standard to get benefits from them according to their socioeconomic order. Brahmins made them in number one position because it had created by them and wanted to have wealth and fame or high social position without labor in the name of God or being a agent of God. Now question arises how they can make wealth without any labor? So they choose themselves as agent of god with profession of teacher and acted as royal adviser to king class. Their prime source of income without any harm was from Kings therefore they name them Kshatriya or the maker of Kshatra or lands those own major resources of the acquired land. Kings goes to war and acquire resources but majorly controlled by the royal advisers those are more secured than even a King. King may killed in the war but adviser will be the same to other succeeded king. Second target class was Businessmen or Vaishyas those make money in the society after the King class. They knew with 100% honesty business can’t be done so they coined the word vice and virtue i.e. Pap and Punya, Hell and Heaven. Dishonesty in business, means its a sin or “Pap” in that case Brahmins acted as sin washer-man for which they have to do some holey ritual to wash their sins. Holey “sin washing” rituals costs to sinner so in that way they make money. So many ways they created to make money without getting in to harm by controlling the two upper castes. Initially they had banned to both these Kshatriya and Vaishyas learning Vedas with a fear that they can adopt their profession but due to strong oppositions they privileged to learn them Veda but restricted them to be a professional as priest, teacher and adviser, which was majorly reserved by them to protect their inherited profession. The rest class those were majorly poor they were intentionally put in to poor and ignorant to extract services from them as slaves and named them Shudra. It means, some humans one of our ancestral linguistic race had divided their social group according to the major body parts of a Man designating major social professions to them for managing the social group. Its the reason why they made themselves supreme as Brahmin and said they sprang from Purusha’s mouth. Second Varna i.e. Kshatriyas are created from Purusha’s arms. Merchants were created from Purusha’s thighs and rest all social professionals are created from Purusha’s feet as Shudra.
Scientifically if we will observe the case then we can say, some humans misused the “conformity” to control a social crowd according to their own enforced protocols as per their own evil ways. It means Brahmins created Purusha sukta to control the social group according to their ways for their personal and organized benefits. Since their creation theory is unscientific, illogical, irrational and baseless or based on lies, the promotion of the theory generation to generation implies its a crime done by these peoples to exploit their trapped social groups, and other social groups according to their evil desires. Its the reason why Brahmanism is nothing but a racial organized crime. They wanted to freeze some professions that is priesthood, kingship and trading creating Varna or castes so that peoples with other professions can’t compete with their descendants and they only will profess these professions hereditary reserved by their surnames.