Muslims of India(More than 172 millions)+Pakistan( More than 190 million people)+Bangladesh(Approximately 148.6 millions) jo ki lagbhag 510.6 million yani 51.06 Crore Muslims hai, before 1947 yeshab Indians hi the ye koi Saudi Arab se aye hue log nahi hai. Aap ko agar pata nahi aapke jankarikeliye batadoon Islam koi India ka dharm nahi agar Saudi Araba ik Desert hai aur iska population abke timeme 30.8 million yani only 3.08 crore hai before Islamic period Saudi Arab ka population aap khud andaza laga sakte ho oh kitna honge. Prophet Muhammad 570 CE me paida hue aur apna dharm Islam 40 years ke age me banaya, yani 610AD me duniako Islam mila to iska matlab ye hua 610AD se pahele India me koi Muslim hi nahi tha. Jobhi Muslim bane 610 AD ke baad hi bane. Ab ye question uththta hai ye jo Muslim bane oh kaise Muslims bane or usshe pehele oh koun the aur unka religious identity kya tha? Pakistan, India aur Bangladesh ka jo Muslims hai na oh Arabic bolte hai na Arabse related koi language bolte hai to unka linguistic race ye implicate karta hai oh koi baharse nahi root natives of India hi hai. Arab me koi Bengali bolta haina Hindi na koi Urdu iska matalab ye saaf hai jobhi Musalman yaha hai unka origin root Indians hi hai aur unlogoki ancestorsne Islam religion apne saamaajik existence keliye hi aapnayatha. Ab ye question uthta hai agar ye log tab Muslim nahi the to unka dharm un jamaneme kya tha? 610 AD se pahle hamare deshme bahot sare pradeshik dharm the kyounke usjamaneme koi India ya Bharat ke naamse akhand Rajya nahi tha. Ab ka India tab bahut sare Kingdoms or tribal race and nomadic groups ka collection tha, Jinka khudka aapni language tha, sanskruti thi aur aapna aapna heritage tha. Example ke tour par jaise Gujrati, Hindi, Bihari, Bengali etc. etc. jo ki ab ik ik state ke naampe pahachhan banaye huye hai tabke jamaneme tribal race and kingdom race hi tha. Tabka time me alag alag dharm the jaiski Idolism, shamanism, Ajivika, Charvaka, Jainism, Buddhism and Brahmanism(now Vedism or Hindusim or Sanatan Dharm). Unme dharmki sthapname bhi ladai hota tha aur apna Dharmaki grwothkeliye ik dusrepe havi honeki koshis karte rahtethe. Ab humko dekhna hai ustime kounsi dharmka sthiti kya tha aur kitne log kounsi dharm ko maante the. 610 AD se pehele na koi Musalman than na koi Hindu. Ha.. 610 AD se pehel koi hindu bhi nahi tha yehi kadwa saach hai. Ye hindu word Sindh yani Sindhu nadike naamse aaya hai joki bideshi log yani emperors of Iran or Afghanistan yahaka demography ko represent karnekeliye istamaal kartethe. Jab Islam adopted rulers India demography ko invade kie Jahir hai after 610 AD aapko sabut bhi miljayega after 695 AD hi Islam Indian demographyko aye aur demography ko Al-hind ke naamse designate kia. Sindh ko oh galat pronunciation karke hind bolakarte the aur unka dwellers ko baadme Hindu pahachan mili. Baadme Muslims ko non muslimse alag rakhne keliye Hindu word ka istamaal suru hua. Yani Muslims Invaders ke saath hi Hindu word Indiako mila ushe pehele Hindu wordka koi matlab nahi tha ishliye maine kaha 610AD se pehele na koi Hindu than a koi muslim tha. Ab 610 AD se pehele job hi dharmthe unme apni wajoodki ladhai huakrtatha. Sabse bada Akhand Rajya Indian demographyme king Ashokane hi banaya tha in (268 to 232 BCE) jo abka Pakistan+India+Bangladesh hai. Ashoka Mouryan empireke raja the. Au Mauryans majorly Jain followers the. Agar raja jain hoga to Jahir hai unke followers bhi majorly jain honge. Ashokane Buddhism ko aapna dharm Kalinga warke baad apnaya aur apna Dharm mana, jabki tabki time me Brmhanism yani vedism or Sanatan Dharm tha lekin unhone usko nahi apnaya iska matalanb ye hua king Ashokane Sanatan Dharm ko sahi Dharm nahi mantethe aur Buddhism ko hi sahi dharm manke usko apne rajyme phailaya yani national religion banaya aur bahar deshme bhi phailya. Kyonke Ashoka kingdom hi ab ka India+Pakistan+Bangladesh hai ishka matalab yehua hamare purbajoka major Dharm Buddhism hi tha. Yani in the age of Mauryan empire hamare bahut sare purbaj Buddhism ko hi follow karte honge or kuchh hi log Ajivika, Jainism, Chaarvak, Samanasim, Idolism/polytheism aur Vedism/Brahmanism ko follow kartethe. Brmhanism hi ik yesha dharm hai jo totally violenceke upar hi adharit hai baki ke jo dharm hai na Bhagwanko maante hai na vilonce pasand karte hai. Bramhanism ka janm Vedismse hua. Yani Bramhonone hi caste system ki rachna ki aur iska definition Prusha sukta 10:90 me link kardiya. Kuchh scholars ye bhi bolte hai ye purusha sukta Rig. Ved me baad me jodagaya original vedme ye verse nahi tha yani Brmhnone even Vedko fabricate kari ishkabhi ilzam hai. Lekin kuchh log the jo apne aapko Bramhonoki pahachan deke dushreseko alag rakhtethe. Ab chaliye dekhte hai ye Bramhan aye kahashe?
In the world we are having population of more than 700 crores i.e. more than seven billions. In this 7 billion peoples we are having different countries those are belongs to different races or social groups according to their adopted religions and linguistic race. Different racial groups are having their own way of social life. Now we have to locate where the Brahmins hails from? We can’t find anywhere in the world expect India i.e. one from 267 sovereign and non-sovereign countries. It’s confirmed that Brahmins are belongs to India. Now question arises what is the population of Brahmins in India? Since caste based census by India is absent to till date it is estimated from unofficial sources that they are about 6 crores out of 1,267,401,849 as of July 1 2014 Indian populations. Let’s go to investigate the origin of Brahmins race from Indian history. Brahmin is a varna (caste) in Hinduism specializing as priests, teachers (acharya) and protectors of sacred learning across generations according to wikipedia. Brahmins traditionally were responsible for religious rituals in temples, as intermediaries between temple deities and devotees, as well as rite of passage rituals such as solemnising a wedding with hymns and prayers. Here point to be noted is, the caste is empowering them as Brahmins. If there had no castes then there would not have been Brahmins or other castes. Then what is caste and where it streams from and who were its originators? The caste system hails from Purusha sukta (puruṣasūkta) hymn 10.90 of the Rig-Veda. What Purusha sukta tells about?
The first two verses of the Purusha sukta, with Sayana‘s commentary. Page of Max Müller’s Rig-Veda-sanhita, the Sacred Hymns of the Brahmans (reprint, London 1974).
स॒हस्र॑शीर्षा॒ पुरु॑षः । स॒ह॒स्रा॒क्षः स॒हस्र॑पात् ।
स भूमिं॑ वि॒श्वतो॑ वृ॒त्वा । अत्य॑तिष्ठद्दशांगु॒लम् ॥
पुरु॑ष ए॒वेदग्ं सर्वम्॓ । यद्भू॒तं यच्च॒ भव्यम्॓ ।
उ॒तामृ॑त॒त्व स्येशा॑नः । य॒दन्ने॑नाति॒रोह॑ति ॥
ए॒तावा॑नस्य महि॒मा । अतो॒ ज्यायाग्॑श्च॒ पूरु॑षः ।
पादो॓உस्य॒ विश्वा॑ भू॒तानि॑ । त्रि॒पाद॑स्या॒मृतं॑ दि॒वि ॥
त्रि॒पादू॒र्ध्व उदै॒त्पुरु॑षः । पादो॓உस्ये॒हाஉஉभ॑वा॒त्पुनः॑ ।
ततो॒ विष्व॒ण्-व्य॑क्रामत् । सा॒श॒ना॒न॒श॒ने अ॒भि ॥
तस्मा॓द्वि॒राड॑जायत । वि॒राजो॒ अधि॒ पूरु॑षः ।
स जा॒तो अत्य॑रिच्यत । प॒श्चाद्-भूमि॒मथो॑ पु॒रः ॥
यत्पुरु॑षेण ह॒विषा॓ । दे॒वा य॒ज्ञमत॑न्वत ।
व॒स॒ंतो अ॑स्यासी॒दाज्यम्॓ । ग्री॒ष्म इ॒ध्मश्श॒रध्ध॒विः ॥
स॒प्तास्या॑सन्-परि॒धयः॑ । त्रिः स॒प्त स॒मिधः॑ कृ॒ताः ।
दे॒वा यद्य॒ज्ञं त॑न्वा॒नाः । अब॑ध्न॒न्-पुरु॑षं प॒शुम् ॥
तं य॒ज्ञं ब॒र्॒हिषि॒ प्रौक्षन्॑ । पुरु॑षं जा॒तम॑ग्र॒तः ।
तेन॑ दे॒वा अय॑जंत । सा॒ध्या ऋष॑यश्च॒ ये ॥
तस्मा॓द्य॒ज्ञात्-स॑र्व॒हुतः॑ । संभृ॑तं पृषदा॒ज्यम् ।
प॒शूग्-स्ताग्श्च॑क्रे वाय॒व्यान्॑ । आ॒र॒ण्यान्-ग्रा॒म्याश्च॒ ये ॥
तस्मा॓द्य॒ज्ञात्स॑र्व॒हुतः॑ । ऋचः॒ सामा॑नि जज्ञिरे ।
छंदाग्ं॑सि जज्ञिरे॒ तस्मा॓त् । यजु॒स्तस्मा॑दजायत ॥
तस्मा॒दश्वा॑ अजायंत । ये के चो॑भ॒याद॑तः ।
गावो॑ ह जज्ञिरे॒ तस्मा॓त् । तस्मा॓ज्जा॒ता अ॑जा॒वयः॑ ॥
यत्पुरु॑षं॒ व्य॑दधुः । क॒ति॒था व्य॑कल्पयन् ।
मुखं॒ किम॑स्य॒ कौ बा॒हू । कावू॒रू पादा॑वुच्येते ॥
ब्रा॒ह्म॒णो॓உस्य॒ मुख॑मासीत् । बा॒हू रा॑ज॒न्यः॑ कृ॒तः ।
ऊ॒रू तद॑स्य॒ यद्वैश्यः॑ । प॒द्भ्याग्ं शू॒द्रो अ॑जायतः ॥
च॒ंद्रमा॒ मन॑सो जा॒तः । चक्षोः॒ सूर्यो॑ अजायत ।
मुखा॒दिंद्र॑श्चा॒ग्निश्च॑ । प्रा॒णाद्वा॒युर॑जायत ॥
नाभ्या॑ आसीद॒ंतरि॑क्षम् । शी॒र्ष्णो द्यौः सम॑वर्तत ।
प॒द्भ्यां भूमि॒र्दिशः॒ श्रोत्रा॓त् । तथा॑ लो॒काग्म् अक॑ल्पयन् ॥
वेदा॒हमे॑तं पुरु॑षं म॒हांतम्॓ । आ॒दि॒त्यव॑र्णं॒ तम॑स॒स्तु पा॒रे ।
सर्वा॑णि रू॒पाणि॑ वि॒चित्य॒ धीरः॑ । नामा॑नि कृ॒त्वाஉभि॒वद॒न्॒, यदाஉஉस्ते॓ ॥
धा॒ता पु॒रस्ता॒द्यमु॑दाज॒हार॑ । श॒क्रः प्रवि॒द्वान्-प्र॒दिश॒श्चत॑स्रः ।
तमे॒वं वि॒द्वान॒मृत॑ इ॒ह भ॑वति । नान्यः पंथा॒ अय॑नाय विद्यते ॥
य॒ज्ञेन॑ य॒ज्ञम॑यजंत दे॒वाः । तानि॒ धर्मा॑णि प्रथ॒मान्या॑सन् ।
ते ह॒ नाकं॑ महि॒मानः॑ सचंते । यत्र॒ पूर्वे॑ सा॒ध्यास्संति॑ दे॒वाः ॥
अ॒द्भ्यः संभू॑तः पृथि॒व्यै रसा॓च्च । वि॒श्वक॑र्मणः॒ सम॑वर्त॒ताधि॑ ।
तस्य॒ त्वष्टा॑ वि॒दध॑द्रू॒पमे॑ति । तत्पुरु॑षस्य॒ विश्व॒माजा॑न॒मग्रे॓ ॥
वेदा॒हमे॒तं पुरु॑षं म॒हांतम्॓ । आ॒दि॒त्यव॑र्णं॒ तम॑सः॒ पर॑स्तात् ।
तमे॒वं वि॒द्वान॒मृत॑ इ॒ह भ॑वति । नान्यः पंथा॑ विद्य॒तेஉय॑नाय ॥
प्र॒जाप॑तिश्चरति॒ गर्भे॑ अ॒ंतः । अ॒जाय॑मानो बहु॒धा विजा॑यते ।
तस्य॒ धीराः॒ परि॑जानंति॒ योनिम्॓ । मरी॑चीनां प॒दमिच्छंति वे॒धसः॑ ॥
यो दे॒वेभ्य॒ आत॑पति । यो दे॒वानां॓ पु॒रोहि॑तः ।
पूर्वो॒ यो दे॒वेभ्यो॑ जा॒तः । नमो॑ रु॒चाय॒ ब्राह्म॑ये ॥
रुचं॑ ब्रा॒ह्मं ज॒नय॑ंतः । दे॒वा अग्रे॒ तद॑ब्रुवन् ।
यस्त्वै॒वं ब्रा॓ह्म॒णो वि॒द्यात् । तस्य॒ दे॒वा अस॒न् वशे॓ ॥
ह्रीश्च॑ ते ल॒क्ष्मीश्च॒ पत्न्यौ॓ । अ॒हो॒रा॒त्रे पा॒र्श्वे ।
नक्ष॑त्राणि रू॒पम् । अ॒श्विनौ॒ व्यात्तम्॓ ।
इ॒ष्टं म॑निषाण । अ॒मुं म॑निषाण । सर्वं॑ मनिषाण ॥
तच्चं॒ योरावृ॑णीमहे । गा॒तुं य॒ज्ञाय॑ । गा॒तुं य॒ज्ञप॑तये । दैवी॓ स्व॒स्तिर॑स्तु नः । स्व॒स्तिर्मानु॑षेभ्यः । ऊ॒र्ध्वं जि॑गातु भेष॒जम् । शं नो॑ अस्तु द्वि॒पदे॓ । शं चतु॑ष्पदे ।
Purusha is described as a primeval giant, not unlike Norse Ymir, that is sacrificed by the gods (Purushamedha) and from whose body the world and the varnas (castes) are built. He is described as having a thousand heads and a thousand feet. He emanated Viraj, the female creative principle, from which in turn the world was made. In the sacrifice of Purusha, the Vedic chants were first created. The horses and cows were born, the Brahmins were made from Purusha’s mouth, the Kshatriyas from his arms, the Vaishyas from his thighs, and the Shudras from his feet. The Moon was born from his spirit, the Sun from his eyes, the heavens from his skull. Indra and Agni emerged from his mouth.
According to above definition of creation it proofs how weak and poor standard of wisdom used for this philosophy; again that implies, it is not only from a blind beliefs origin but also from irrational origin of their so called mind born imaginative wisdom. Purusha sukta is unscientific and from stupid wisdom origin. It is not mentioned where this “cosmic man” hailed from. Where itself God hailed from and who were those prime Gods? Why it is sacrificed? If they sacrificed then to whom they sacrificed? And who sacrificed? How it is possible a cosmic man had thousands of heads and thousands of feets etc. ? How female creative principle had happened? How could it be possible, sacrificing a “cosmic man” all the world made from his body parts? How it’s possible sacrificing a “cosmic man” Vedic chanted can be created? How horses and cows were born by sacrificing “cosmic man”? How and why? the Brahmins were made from Purusha’s mouth, the Kshatriyas from his arms, the Vaishyas from his thighs, and the Shudras from his feet? Is it really possible sacrificing a “cosmic man” all these can be created? How the Moon was born from his spirit? and the Sun from his eyes? The heavens from his skull? and how breath became air? If the cosmic person was able to breathing then how itself breath became air? Where breathing of cosmic person itself proofs air was present before his breath being air. How Indra and Agni emerged from his mouth? Its simply a hypocrisy imaginative bogus principle of creation theory by some stupid so called intellectual scholars those recognize them as Brahmins. Some Scholars also says Veda was with some other versions and some so called stupid scholars had corrupted them and added fourfold caste system and other selfish things for self and organized benefits. Whatever the case; since it all happened in Indian origin, in simple definition we have to admit, some peoples from ancient Indian origin those were belongs to specif demography region in the age of kingdoms or tribes classified themselves as superior to others naming them as Brahmins to dominate others by not only socioeconomically but also educationally, judicially, and politically etc. with hook and crook (छल और बल) ideology. Since they are now only 6 crores of total Indian population, we can guess what might be their population in the age of Vedism. The population of the territory that became the British Raj was 100 million by 1600 and remained nearly stationary until the 19th century. The population of the Raj reached 255 million according to the first census taken in 1881 of India. If we calculate maximum 5% Brhamins were there in British Raj then their population will be some thing like 50 Lakhs in 1600AD and if we will go further to the age of Pushyamitra Shunga i.e. 185BC-149BC then it would be even less than 50 thousands. Having less populated commune origin indicates the Brahmanism ideology had created by specific group of people for their evil motives to rule other inhabitants surround to them. They were self claimed super race to dominate others for their self and organized benefits. According to their Vedic division Shudras (more than 80%) were more than Brahmins, Kshatriyas and Vaishiyas which implies the India is majorly belongs to Shudras not to this minority communes. Later in medieval age i.e. after the age of Ashoka and Pushyamitra Shunga or after declination of Buddhism when Brahmins age was in its extreme regime in the medieval age of Bhakti movement or Puranic age of Brahmins, few Shudras and Athishudras those were little bit educated and clever than other Shudras and were from mixed breeds with Shudras and wanted a favorable positions they uplifted themselves to higher castes by hook and crook or with favoritism with the mutual understanding by Brahmins departing themselves from Shudras but all remained underneath the Brahmin’s caste but remains a controversy about their real class. In puranic age Brahmins linked purusha sukta with Bramha. Majorly famous Puranas were created after the declination of Buddhism in India. As an example Markandeya Purana to c. 250 CE (with one portion dated to c. 550 CE), Matsya Purana to c. 250–500 CE, Vayu Purana to c. 350 CE, Harivamsa and Vishnu Purana to c. 450 CE, Brahmanda Purana to c. 350–950 CE, Vamana Purana to c. 450–900 CE, Kurma Purana to c. 550–850 CE, and Linga Purana to c. 600–1000 CE, the Padma Purana (Srishti Khand, Patal Khand and Uttar Khand) was compiled between the 4th and 15th century, Bhavishya Purana, Yama Samhita, Mahabharata and Brihad Parashar Smriti etc. had created to promote Bramhanism or Sanatana Dharma. According to post vedic caste definition, Brahmins said that Brahma, the Creator, having established the four varnas i.e. Brahmin, Kshatriya, Vaishya and Shudra from his mouth, arms, thighs and legs. Later Brahmin added new mind born story for uplifting mix breeds clever Shudras those were rival to their castesm including a story of Yama and his record maintainer Chittagupta. According to Brahmins, Bramha ordained Dharamraj ( also called Yamraj, the god of death) to keep record of the deeds — good and evil — of all life-forms born and yet to be born on the earth, in the heavens above and in the lands below. Dharamraj, however, complained, “O Lord, how can I alone keep record of the deeds of the beings born into lakhs and lakhs of yonis (life-forms) in the three worlds? (Swarga(heaven), Martya(land) and paatal (under land)).” Brahma then closed his eyes, meditated for a while and lo and behold! there appeared a radiant figure with a quill-pen in one hand and an ink-pot in another. Brahma named him Chittagupta for he was conceived in his cognitive-self (chitta) and he was lying in Him, dormant and secret (gupta). He was born of Brahma’s body (kaya) and so the Lord decreed that his progenies be called Kayasthas. He was assigned to work as a minister, to write and record for Dharamraj Yama. Thus, the fifth varna, the Kayastha, came into existence those were designated to this uplifted clever Shudras. Kayasthas were majorly in chaos for their castes whether they are belongs to Shudra or Kshatriya or Brahmin? There is no fifth Varna according to Purusha Sukta so this fifth varna is a fabrication. According to some scholars Kayasthas are “Pratiloma and Biloma descendants,” or inter-caste descendants. The truth is they know they are belongs to Shudra but protesting them will be problem to their Brahmanism so better create a story in that way that neither they will be designated to Brahmins but will limit their circumference to Shudra to Kashtriya. According to Purusha sukta they are neither belongs to Kings family nor to Merchants or from Brahmins so they straight way fall in to Shudra or Atishudra but due to favoritism of Brahmins they departed them as kayastha so that they won’t fight as anti Bramhins and caste system can be well maintained in the society without any disturbance. Its the reason why some parts of India Kayasthas are Shudra and in some parts they are Kshatriya according to level of dominance of Brahmins hegemony and according to their certification. Some kingdoms or tribal races those were designated as Shudras and Atishudras kingdoms by Vedic Brahmins had even uplifted themselves as upper castes below to Brahmins by mutual understanding certification by them. Rajputs, Gurjars, Yadavas and Jats are good examples for this kind of conversion. It was a conspiracy something like, creating a barrier, Shudra against Shudra i.e. uplifted Shudra can even exploit Shudra those are not elevated. Brahmins Bramha’s Chittagupta Kayastaha theory was not there in the age of Siddhartha Gautama Buddha but in post vedic Brahmins age Buddha even became kayastha departing him from AtiShudra and later Kayastha Kshatriya so that Shudra can’t feel proud of him that he was Shudra in post Vedic popularity of Buddha.
Since Brahmins history in Hinduism as specializing priests, teachers (acharya) and protectors of sacred learning across generations they are only creator of this philosophy. The philosophy of this kind of creation is intentionally made without any base to fool and control the social groups by some intellectual thugs for their personal and organized benefits as a race. I have no intention to condemn them without any base though their evil intention implies them as intellectual thugs or antisocial intellectuals or in psychological term racial sociopaths. They implemented this theory as an authority of intellectuals to ignorant and innocents to manage them according to their wish. Since Rig-Veda had written in Sanskrit according to evidences and there is no proofs till exist it had translated from other language to Sanskrit it show those were using Sanskrit as their communicative language were prime promoters of Vedic philosophy. Since the writers of Rig-Veda tradition associates as rishis so we can say these were the rishis those were designated themselves as Brahmins. It is said Angiras, Kanva, Vasishtha, Vishvamitra, Atri, Bhrgu, Kashyapa, Grtsamada, Agastya, Bharata were the prime writer of this Veda. It is clear some rishis or intellectual think tanks of ancient kingdoms proclaimed themselves as Brahmins or super intellectuals promoting their written Vedic Philosophy, but all rishis were not belongs to Brahmins or had a certification of Vedic caste system. The Manuscripts of Rig-Veda are not so old as we are told by Vedic promoters comparing even to Buddhism Manuscripts. There are, for example, 30 manuscripts of Rigveda at the Bhandarkar Oriental Research Institute, collected in the 19th century by Georg Bühler, Franz Kielhorn and others, originating from different parts of India, including Kashmir, Gujarat, the then Rajaputana, Central Provinces etc. They were transferred to Deccan College, Pune, in the late 19th century. They are in the Sharada and Devanagari scripts, written on birch bark and paper. The oldest of them is dated to 1464AD. The 30 manuscripts of Rigveda preserved at the Bhandarkar Oriental Research Institute, Pune were added to UNESCO’s Memory of the World Register in 2007. But recently an important archaeological discovery was made, consisting of the earliest known Buddhist manuscripts, recovered from the ancient civilization of Gandhara in north central Pakistan (near Taxila just south west of the capital Islamabad). These fragments, written on birch bark, are dated to the 1st century and have been compared to the Dead Sea scrolls in importance. Donated to the British Library in 1994, they are now being studied in a joint project at the University of Washington. We can find many Buddhist evidence and inscriptions dated to Asoka period i.e. about to 232 BC but we can’t find any Vedic inscriptions and their evidences across the country as they claim older than other ancient faiths originated in India. Astonishingly even Sanskrit has not having their own letters. They use Hindi that is possibly letters of popular ancient language now claimed as Hindi or Devnagari for their manuscripts. It all proofs there is a conspiracy of racial hegemony to Indian race by Brahmins. Now let’s talk about how many peoples in India speaks Sanskrit as their mother tongue. It’s because they are the root clan of the Vedic philosophy as an inheritance. In the 2001 census of India, only 14,135 people reported Sanskrit as their native language  It means Sanskrit spoken peoples are even less than presently population of Brahmins! Why? If Brahmins those are officiating Hindu rituals in different parts of the India don’t have their mother tongue as Sanskrit? It expose another truth that those Brahmins are now populate as 6 crores are not all from a single Bramhanic origin! Whey titles of Brahmins changes with changing the linguistic race? And Brahmins has different sects? Why Bhumihar Brahmin, Bengali Brahmins, Kulin Brahmins, List of Telugu, Brahmins, List of Maithil Brahmin, List of Kashmiri Pandits, List of Goud Saraswat, Brahmins, List of Deshastha Brahmins, List of Chitpavans, List of Iyengars, List of Iyers, List of Deshastha Brahmin surnames, List of Saraswats are present? What exactly it means? It means Brahmins is not a race from any single origin. It is adoption of a commune according to their designated profession defined in Rig-Vedic Purusha sukta 10.90 in the time of implementation. Now question arises how it all happened? For this we have to go past history who and how rig-Vedic philosophy had implemented to present India.
India officially the Republic of India is a country in South Asia. It is the seventh-largest country by area (3,287,590 km2), the second-most populous country with over 1.2 billion people, and the most populous democracy in the world. Religion in India is characterized by a diversity of religious beliefs and practices. India is the birthplace of world’s four major religions; namely Hinduism (15% of world population), Buddhism (7.1% of world population), Jainism and Sikhism. Religion has been an important part of the country’s culture throughout India’s history. Its estimated approximately Hinduism holds 78.35%, Islam 14.88%, Christianity 2.5%, Sikhism 1.9%, Buddhism 0.9%, Jainism 0.4% and other holds 0.9% of Indian population.
Demography of British India i.e. present Pakistan + India + Bangladesh was a place of many kingdoms or princely states in the “age of Kingdoms,” and “age of exploration,” without any National name as like today’s India (Name given by British which is derived from the word Indus/Sindhu, a river that flows through Pakistan, the Indian states of Jammu and Kashmir and Gujarat, and western Tibet), Hindustan (Given by the Islamic emperors, which indirectly says slave to Islam i.e. land (Stan) of Hindus or dweller of Shindhus, and the word Hindu is derived from Sindhu, a river that flows through Pakistan, the Indian states of Jammu and Kashmir and Gujarat, and western Tibet, without any religion brand, like presently dedicated or hijacked to Vedism or Santana Dharma) and Bharat (1. Given by Vedic promoters claiming younger brother of Rama i.e. Bharat was the emperor of British Indian demography once upon a time, but according epics he was a king of only Ajodhya/Ayodhya which is a city i.e. a tiny part of present India at the south end in the Indian state of Uttar Pradesh. Ayodhya used to be the capital of the ancient Kosala Kingdom., 2. Other theory is; it is named as Bharat because Jain’s first Tirthankar Lord Rishabhadev’s eldest son Bharat Chakravorty had ruled to the land long and long days back where exact time and area of demography is unknown; according to Jains, Jain Dharma is an ancient religion & even older than Vedic-Hinduism., 3. Another claim is, long days back in history, the land had ruled by a brave like lion emperor Bharat, where exact time and area of demography is unknown. He was the founder of the Bhārata dynasty and thus an ancestor of the Pandavas and the Kauravas in the Sanskrit epic, Mahabharata. Vedic supporters claim, the Bhāratas are prominent tribe in the Rigveda, the story of Bharata is first told in the Adi Parva of Mahabharata, wherein he is the son of Dushyanta and Shakuntala).
Majorly Sindhu/Indus River has been used as an emblem or symbol to recognize the dwellers of this river’s side gigantic plane without affiliation to any religion. Sindhu is a river without relating to any faith or religion, which is badly used to represent a faith for communal benefits in Hinduism. These names had been given by their respective governments in their regime when they were in the power to this big demographic area according to their favor. India is practically unification of many kingdoms, tribes and nomadic groups. These kingdoms, tribes and nomadic groups had their own language, literature, social administration, heritage, with or without any faith system, art and culture etc. in their individual regime. Now we recognize major kingdoms, tribes and nomadic groups as a State or province according to their respective languages like Hindi, Sindhi, Punjabi, Guajarati, Telugu, Tamil, Marathi, Bihari, Odia, Sanskrit etc. etc. These kingdoms, tribes and nomadic groups had always involved with the warfare to enlarge their demography for acquiring resources. Kings, tribal chiefs and nomadic chiefs were the head of their social commune. The largest kingdom had ever ruled in this demography was by King Ashoka (269 BCE to 232 BCE). Ashoka reigned over a realm that stretched from the Hindu Kush mountains in the west to Bengal in the East and covered the entire Indian subcontinent except parts of present day Tamil Nadu and Kerala. Emerging with the demographics, amalgamations of their art of living was also taking an evolution. According to historic literature evidence we come across the race those were using Sanskrit as their communicative language had written Vedas those were a smallest part of this largest demography. Now even Sanskrit is spoken by some people which is approximately or even less than 1000 in Uttarakhand and in some village like Mattur or Muttoor (Karnataka), Hosahalli (Karnataka), Jhiri (Madhya Pradesh), Mohad (Madhya Pradesh), Baghuwar (Madhya Pradesh). Vedas are the proofs of these Sanskrit using clan was believing in Rig Vedic fourfold class system. These Vedic supporters had always trying to implement their fourfold caste system to administrate the reined kingdoms society and always were considering the non-implemented society as out castes or Atishudras. Vedic philosophy is based on the faith of God that implements theocracy according to their distribution of occupation maintained by Purusha Sukta as Brahmin, Ksatriya, Vaisyas and Sudra as I mentioned above. They were implementing this theory to the society to administrate the kingdom after they rein it. According to their creation story of Veda, it describes the division of the primordial being Purusha into the four castes “for the protection of this whole creation”. Brahmins were born from the mouth, Ksatriyas from the arms, Vaisyas from the thighs and Sudras from the feet. Each one of these castes from the beginning was assigned a particular purpose and station in life. Brahmins (priests) were to recite and teach the Veda, offer and officiate at sacrifices, and receive gifts, while Ksatriyas (warriors) were charged mainly with protecting others, and Vaisyas (merchants) were to engage in “trade, money lending or any kind of actions of buying and selling goods and services.” These first three castes constituted the ‘twice-born’ who had, if they led pure lives, fairly decent chances of going to heaven but Sudras as lower castes those were treated as menial which will serve to these three upper castes without touching to them and have no chance for any change for their present life. Brahmin, Ksatirya and Vaisyas are known as upper castes those enjoy services of lower castes and lower caste had to serve them without dignity, equality, education, liberty and property. Change of occupation and social status strictly prohibited in Vedic believes. It means Brahmins can’t be degraded to Sudra and Sudra can’t get the position of Brahmin and vice versa for the other two castes Ksatriyas and Vaisyas. Those were not belongs to a part of their society i.e. not a Brahmin or Ksatriya or Vaisya or Sudra were considered as out castes or Atisudras those were even treated as worse than animals and even more degraded and cruel ways as they like. In their age of Vedism, Kingdoms without having Vedic management system were considered as kingdoms of Atisudras. In the age of kingdom the largest kingdom had acquired by the king Ashoka who was a king of Mauryan Dynasty, was a kingdom of Atishudra as per the Vedic philosophy; it’s because Mauryans had declined the Vedic beliefs. Vedism is a faith of “discrimination and violence” as its base, whose masterminds were only Vedic promoter Brahmins. Vedic implementer Brahmins and Vedic adopted Brahmins of different princely states have no biological relationship to each others, so adopted Brahmins are also victims of Vedic classifications; and enjoyed so called high status reserved by Vedic class system by maintaining and promoting the cruel rules of discrimination for personal and communal benefits. Many Hindu followers even don’t know cow slaughtering was an occupation of Brahmins in the age of Vedism. Brahmins were officiating Bali (sacrifice) for fulfilling the desires of followers by offering to their loving deities. Balis (sacrifices) were eaten by Brahmins in that days. Sacrifice is a normal word in Vedism. You can find also terms like gomedha (cow sacrifice), ashwamedha (horse sacrifice), purushamedha (man sacrifice) in Veda and many Vedic imposed Hindu scriptures. Another example is the Sanskrit scripture Bhagavad Gita which was inserted into an epic called the Mahabharata which had written by ved Vyasa that teaches justice by violence. The story of Mahabharata is fight between cousin brothers for justice. Every human will agree, taking alcohol as bad habits and gambling is a crime and sin but story starts with the gambling and ends with the justice for Pandavas those had defeated in gambling; lord Krishna helped Pandavas to make them win against thousands of lives in the war for a simple crime i.e. insulting or outraging modesty of a woman is ridicules and foolishness justice ever made in ancient history. Against the one woman’s modesty i.e. Drupadi, thousands and thousands of innocent women and children lost their innocent husbands and fathers, mothers lost their sons, sisters lost their brothers, is which kind of justice by Lord Krishna only he knows or if its said by itself writer in the name of Krishna then he knows, which reflects the level of understanding of these identities and its promoters. How a divine identity with the position of God supported gamblers to kill millions of innocents in the war is a good example how violence is taught in the name of morals in Hinduism.
Buddha had born in India and was a great opposer to Vedism. He had declined to the concept of God and worshiping of idols, animal sacrifices and even had declined to fourfold caste system of Vedism. Buddha was a great follower to good human values, perfect justice, meditations, and even was a dedicated follower to good knowledge or intelligence and rationality. Vedism begins with fourfold caste system i.e. classifying humans in four groups which creates human discrimination and social disharmony, violence i.e. different kind of animal sacrifices, bribe to God for fulfilling their desires etc.; Even in many Vedic chants we can see the use of word “Swaha/Svāhā/Svadha/Soha” means destroy or kill or finish as per the worshiping activities done by a priest at Hindu ceremonials or Yajyen/Havan i.e. whenever fire sacrifices are made, svāhā is chanted repeatedly, but their scholars explain different meaning for this word as per their understandings like, “let it be,” “hail,” “well said,” “so be it,” “verily,” “I prostrate myself,” “how wonderful!” etc., some even claims Svaha is a minor goddess, wife of Agni. Buddha’s path starts from non-violence, equality; freedom of thought, speech and life; kind, calm, peace, share, care and loving to each other without any discrimination etc. where Vedic base is violence, bribe to God and discrimination, favoritism, nepotism etc. as its prime base. Ashoka (269 BCE to 232 BCE) had embraced the Buddhism. It’s the Ashoka who was the king of violence became nonviolent after embracing the Buddhism and propagated this attitude to his kingdom without any force or violence. It’s in human history only one religion which had been spread or propagated i.e. Buddhism without any violence or force to different parts of the world. He had propagated Buddhism as his National religion without any force and had made lot of emblems of Buddhism as Shrines, Stupas, Viharas, and Monasteries etc. for good art of living without any violence. Buddhism became National religion to Kingdom of Ashoka; even till to date we see many emblems of Buddha in different parts of India though it had been ruined a lot by Vedic and Islamic promoters. He became supporter of, “use of human intelligence and force should be benefits or protection of the mankind not for destruction of mankind and Nature.” He had propagated the Buddhism outside of kingdoms; this is the reason why we come across China, Japan, Sri Lanka, South Korea etc. Nations with Buddhist followers. Since non-violence is one of the prime value of Buddhism, he had banned the Bali and punished the Brahmins not to conduct sacrifices and eating of the meats as holy food or Prasad. Buddhism and Jainism strongly support non-violence, and Buddhism also declines human discrimination in any ground. Buddha was supporting to class-less society and had declined the Vedic fourfold caste system and Brahmins hegemony. He was supporter of good human values without any kind of discrimination; and had declined existence of God. We can say Buddha as, “well recognized ancient Psychologist” and an “Atheist” who had enlightened with good human values. I said Buddha as an atheist its because Buddha never believed in God and had taken it as absurd. Atheists are more better than theists comparing with their human values, knowledge and use of human force and intelligence. History is the evidence theists are more violent than atheists and cause for many social evils and pains. Buddha had said; do not believe blindly in anything simply because you have heard it. Do not believe in anything blindly simply because it is spoken and rumored by many. Do not believe blindly in anything simply because it is found written in your religious books. Do not believe blindly in anything merely on the authority of your teachers and elders. Do not believe blindly in traditions because they have been handed down for many generations. But after observation and analysis, when you find that anything agrees with reason and is conducive to the good and benefit of one and all, then accept it and live up to it. Which is a modern thought of scientific world. He had also told if my verses are wrong after observation then discard it. This is the reason why Ashoka followed the same thing for his kingdom without adopting Vedic faith. He had forced to citizens to care the Nature and old age persons, must responsible for maintenance of old age parents and dependents, must respect to elders and stop cutting trees etc. and was promoting for forestations or plantation of trees. He had declined any kind of animal sacrifice in his regime and was punishing with hardcore punishments for neglecting this law. Due to fear of punishment many Brahmins became vegetarian and it’s became a puritanical part to their evolution. Later Vedic adoptee or labeled Brahmins also started to worship cows as divine saying Gomata (Cow is our mother) even considered its poops i.e. cow dung and cow pee are all divine and sacred. When Vedic Brahmins lost their job Ashoka helped them to join his army for livelihood. Many Brahmins joined the army of Ashoka and one Brahmin named Pushyamitra Shunga also became chief commander of Ashoka’s army. Suppression to Brahmins had created the deep internal betrayal in their heart and they were seeking for a revenge. They got this chance after the Ashoka’s regime, when his non-violent Buddhist descendant ruled the kingdom; when most of his family members were busy in spreading Buddhism in different parts of the world; This Brahmin chief commander of Ashoka kingdom dishonestly beheaded mercilessly to descendant of Ashoka named Brihadratha and proclaimed himself as the king of “kingdom of Ashoka,” and changed all the things in favor of Brahmins implementing irrational Manusmriti. Banabhatta in his Harshacharita says, Pushyamitra, while parading the entire Mauryan army before Brihadratha on the pretext of showing him the strength of the army, crushed his master, Brihadratha Maurya. When he implemented forcefully the faith of Vedic fourfold caste system to Many Ashokan’s linguistic races the citizens divided in to four classes according to their profession they were doing at that time. So tribal priests or idol care takers became Brahmins. It’s the reason why we get different kind of linguistic Brahmins with different surnames. Kings of different united Asoka’s kingdoms designated to Kshatriyas. Those were professing business in that time designated to Vaishyas and rest are Shudras and Atishudras. It is said in one day Pushymitra Shunga had killed more than 70,000 innocent Buddhist monks and had declared 100 gold coins for one Buddhist monk’s head. Vedic Brahmins were the first radical terrorist those had done Buddhist monks genocide in India to eradicate the Buddhism from India in that age of kingdoms. It might be the first radical terrorism in the world. He terrorized the kingdom of Ashoka by forcefully implementing Vedic beliefs to the kingdoms those were part of the largest kingdom of Ashoka. He tried to destroy all the emblems of Buddhism as much as he can in kingdom of Ashoka. Many Hindu temples we see may be a Buddhist shrine before Vedism implemented to the land. Vedic promoters destroyed, fabricated and contaminated Buddhist culture in India in every means after that Islam did the same with the Vedic culture or with the Sanatan Dharma. Pushyamitra Sunga (185–149 BCE), the dishonest cruel Brahmin chief commander of Ashoka’s kingdom terrorized to those acquired kingdoms of Ashoka in such a way, that Buddhism became a relic in India, and India is having all the problems till to date due to this reason. Vedic faith is the faith that had been implemented with the shine of swords as Islam had implemented in India. He suppressed Shudras and AtiShudras implementing hardcore punishments to them and privileged Brahmins with different reservation implementing cruel Manusmriti i.e. the constitution of Brahmins. He suppressed Shudras and Atishudras banning right to good life, liberty, education, property, dignity, equality, opportunity etc. for long decades; it’s the reason why Shudras and AtiShudra became suppressed, illiterate, uneducated and poor after regime of Ashoka. If Aryan Invading theory is correct as claimed by some scholars, then its also like a foreign religion as Islam and Christianity. Vedic promoters started to include many famous identities of different smallest kingdom, those were super identities as pagan deities in their religious culture. Whether it is belongs to real or a part of story or popular hearsay or a fiction or imaginative/mind born all became spiritual icon to their Dharma if they considered it as beneficial to them. Initially it was named as Sanatan Dharma and after that it is renamed as Hinduism which is in practical, Vedism imposed on paganism or belief of many famous local deities to a religious communal beliefs as a brand. They included major famous local identities as the part of their religious culture like Rama, Krishna, Shiva, Ganesh etc. those were pagan deities with imaginative or mind born identities which won’t be found in any Vedic scriptures but later Vedic supporter added them as super powers and icons of Dharma as Avataras or incarnation and reincarnation in their philosophy with super coated honey lies and created many literature as resources of faith, with con-literature or honey coated lie literature and many festivals and ceremonials so that the followers won’t get time to find out their exploitation logic due to busy life and enjoyment of celebrations. Now according to Vedic philosophy Rama is belongs to Kshatriya who was a son of impotent king Dasharatha had made suicide due to his own conjugal disturbances and had fought for wife Sita who had been abducted by Ravana. He got her back with exchange of thousands innocents life in the war saying it as justice against the outraging modesty of his own wife. Krishna who was belongs to Yadu clan is belongs to OBC (other back word class) which is Vedic Sudra according to their fourfold caste division. Lord Shiva belongs to kiratians which is ST (Sheduled tribe) or Atishudra so his imaginative or artificial or mind born son God Ganesh is also belongs to ST according to Vedic division. No God will never tell to worship his private part where he piss or excretes or passes his residual or impure elements of the body and use the body part for reproductions, i.e. penis of Shiva, which is famous as “Shiva Linga” but these hypocrites Vedic promoters fooled their ignorant and innocent followers telling them the penis of Lord Shiva as divine. They brain washed the followers mind in such a way that, if they are told anything in the name of God they blindly accepted that without any interpretation and understanding, which is one kind of mental illness that makes a follower psychologically logical blind; and follower with millions with this problem is nothing but mass hysteria. How a private part of a God could be an emblem of divine source? Which kind of divinity is there where Lord Shiva passes his urine? Is really stupidity and ridiculous. Those are promoting all these things in the name of spirituality knowingly or without knowledge either stupid scholars or criminals. Majorly Vedic lower caste deities are famous in the Hinduism, not a single Brahmin God worshiped except Brahma which is biologically impossible i.e. man with remaining four heads. Brahma had five heads but one head had slain by Shiva and that fell down in Badrinath in Uttarakhand. Now this fifth head can be seen as Brahma-kapal a stone which is used to fool their followers, victimizing as, their forefathers will be sent to heaven if it is worshiped. According to Vedic promoters Brahma is the creator of the universe, Saraswati, who became the wife of her own father, was the daughter of Brahma. There are two stories about her genesis in the “Saraswati Purana”. One is that Brahma created his beautiful daughter Saraswati direct from his “vital strength” or seminal fluid. The other is that Brahma used to collect his semen in a pot whenever he masturbated fixing his carnal eyes on the celestial beauty Urvasi. Brahma’s semen in the pot gave birth to Saraswati. Thus, Saraswati had no mother. This daughter of Brahma is the Hindu goddess of learning. When Brahma saw the beauty of Saraswati he became amorous. To escape from her father’s passionate approach Saraswati ran to the lands in all four directions, but she could not escape from her father. She succumbed to Brahma’s wish. Brahma and his daughter Saraswati lived as husband and wife indulging in incest for many years. They had a son Swayambhumaru. Swayambhumaru made love with his sister Satarpa. Through the incest of Brahma’s son and daughter Brahma got two grandsons and two grand-daughters. There is only one recognized temple of Brahma or Brahma Mandir situated at Pushkar in the Indian state of Rajasthan, close to the Pushkar Lake where hardly followers goes to worship. Though thousands and thousands of Hindu temples are there, Adi Shankara (788–820 CE), a Keralian Nambudiri Brahmin, a Hindu philosopher and theologian, a prominent spiritual Hindu leader from India had certified four places as four sacred pilgrims for Hindu followers i.e. Char-Dham temples, which are Badrinath (supporters claims, date of built is in 9th century CE but architectures shows it’s a temple of few centuries back), Rameshwaram (12th century CE), Dwarka (15th- 16th century) and Jagannath-Puri (Date of built is 1161 CE i.e. in 12th century CE) placing his four Shankaracharya Peeth (Seats) at the Chaar Dham school of Hinduism. He organized the Hindu monks under four Maṭhas (Sanskrit: मठ) (monasteries), with the headquarters at Dvārakā in the West, Jagannatha Puri in the East, Sringeri Sharada Peetham in the South and Badrikashrama in the North. There is a belief among the Hindu community that a yatra or visit to the Char Dham washes away all the sins of a person and takes him to ‘Moksha'(release from the cycle of rebirth impelled by the law of karma). It is also believed that a Hindu must visit these pilgrimage sites once in his lifetime to wash all its sins. Many pagan faith creators also added their own deity as a part of Hindu religious culture; for an example Gadhimai in north India had created by an accused worshiper named choudhury where Hindu sacrifices more than 200000 animals in its ceremonial festival. Some Indian humans also claim themselves as human personification of God and get worshiped as living God by their followers and rule their empire of faith; Once they are dead they are also getting the same position like old deities as Shiva, Vishnu, Bramha, Krishna etc., which is really irrational and ridiculous. According to the Hindu believers there were 330000000 deities in Hindu faith; now new human deities are increasing the numbers of Hindu deities day by day, where exact number of present Hindu deities are not maintained and unknown. Many clever or knave faith creators used the three male identities i.e. Bramha, Vishnu and Maheswar or Shiva as source God to his/her created God or deity as Avatar; like so, many famous Goddess like Lakshmi, Kali and Jagadamba or Durga are also used as source deity for their created Goddess as Avatara or as reincarnation with honey coated lie stories with rich literature or rich praising motivational words that tells about miracles of identity and services can be achieved by that deity to motivate the followers. Swaminarayan Akshardham, (Date of built: 6 November 2005) a temple complex of New Delhi, is the world’s largest comprehensive Hindu temple, located near the banks of the holi river Yamuna, whose 3,000 volunteers helped 7,000 artisans to construct Akshardham for Bochasanwasi Shri Akshar Purushottam Swaminarayan Sanstha (BAPS). This temple is dedicated to a Brahmin or priest caste of Sarvariya named Swaminarayan (3 April 1781 – 1 June 1830), also known as Sahajanand Swami, as its prime idol in the temple. The monument and complex has carved pillars, nine domes, and 20,000 murtis or idols, including Sita Ram, Radha Krishna, Shiv Parvati, and Lakshmi Narayan etc. as secondary idols. It attracts the followers due to its largest magnificent architecture and used to motivate the followers about the Hindu religious culture, spirituality and faith of Swaminarayan as Vedic promoter. Swaminarayan as its prime god idol, disrespects all the famous Hindu religious idols believed by Hindu flowers. It proves if you have money then you can control the mind of faith followers the way you like. Swaminarayan is viewed as God (Purushottama) by BAPS followers. What benefits or miracles did this identity to India? Which kind of super identity it is? Why should all Hindu followers submit themselves to this identity as God? It’s all stupidity by Vedic supporters and promoters those make fools to their followers for their ignorance and innocence for their selfish and organized benefits; that directly proofs Vedic hegemony over the land.
It all proofs Brahmins are mostly the race of crooks. Brahmins those are not crooks they even don’t like Brahmin Caste. Brahmins are the race of guileful priests, conspirators, stupid scholars, knaves, crooks, Megalomaniacs, Psychopaths, irrationality, blind beliefs, discriminators, lies promoters and spreaders, cheaters, exploiters, crueler, atrocities, corruptions, favoritism, nepotism, traitors, racial ego and status addicts, prestige hunger, greed, rapists (creator of Deva Dashi pratha that forces a girl in the profession of prostitution from her childhood), extremists, orthodox, radicals, terrorists (Brahmins had massacre to large numbers of Buddhist monks in 185 BC, it was world’s first radical attack to a religious group by a religious group) etc. etc. you can’t count their crimes to Indian race. They are curse of Indian race. Whenever they ruled dishonestly to a great empire, the empire always got destroyed. Example is Mouryan Empire destroyed by dishonest Brahmin Pushyamitra Shunga and Marataha Empire destroyed by Chitpavan Brahmin Balaji Baji Rao and his fellow-castemen. Shudras were always great empire makers examples are, Chandragupta and his grandson Ashoka i.e. founder of Mauryan Empire which is now known as India, and another is Maratha Empire by Chhatrapati Shivaji which is well known as Maharastra, now is a part of India. Brahmins are still thinking all Hindus are fools and won’t recognize their real face behind their own created self-claimed noble mask. Don’t believe in Brahmins written literature and history, and even Brahmins influenced writer’s literature and history, they are majorly corrupt and lies.