Organized priesthood as Brahmanism & Purusha Shukta.

How India got devastated by Brahmanism and their Purusha Shukta.  

“Divide and destroy” & “Divide and rule” are the prime weapons of Brahmanism. Racially Brahmins were never ever good in any skilled work without cheating & exploiting in the name of God and religion. They renamed others great work in their favor & in their name to promote their race. Brahmanism is nothing but con/knave/cunning people of every linguistic clans of India worked as organized those had promoted Vedic Purusha sukta certifying themselves as Brahmins i.e. number one social elites of caste based social system and preserved the King profession and traders profession for their created social class Kshatriyas and Vaishyas declining these professions to poor root natives. They are only the masters of cheating and all kind of social evils; altogether a race of crooks. They promoted illiteracy, ignorance, deceptions, delusions, blind beliefs, disharmony and discrimination etc. etc. to their followers so that they can be victimized ever and ever. They are actually stupid criminals those acts as parasites in the Indian societies and lives as jackal/fox and feed themselves by cheating to their followers in the name of religion & God. These days they know their demerits its the reason why they started to adopt those professions, by which they can control their followers and others. They have been trapped the governance in its all perspectives. They have been trapped almost more than 50% positions in executives, legislative and judiciary including fourth pillar of democracy i.e. mainstream Medias. They have been privileged many so called uplifted Shudras certifying them as Kshatriya those are populating positions in Indian Army so that they can be used as their force. No Kings or Kings descendants are there those populates our Army as Kings/Kshatriyas. Kshatriya are only Kings not soldiers. They started to upper caste hunger uplifted Shudras as Kshatriya so that they can be used as their slaved armed force. You can find even people those are so poor that they even don’t get three times meals in a day and says themselves as Kshatriya. Is a King or descent of a King had that so poor circumstances? How many Kings and their family members are there in India? Social so called Kshatriya proud themselves as Kshatriya though they don’t have no Kshetra i.e. land or Kingdoms and even any wealth without the surnames of Kshatriyas.

In many civilization classes are there i.e. rich and poor classes, but you can’t find any Varna system/Castes anywhere in the world except India. Brahmins  stabilized or frozen the professions as Varna class that declined to others and even to each other Varnas. If you are poor then there is possibility of being rich but crook Brahmins frozen the professional classes naming it as varnas/castes and banned their preferred professions to others and made it hereditary to the racial Varnas with surnames. Stupid Brhmin’s son becomes “Pandit” with his birth. He got certificate of Pandit from his mother’s womb. His mother’s womb is his university of knowledge that gives certificate of Pandit/Scholar without any studies and examinations. Brahmin’s programmed Purusha Shukta with that evil intentions, that made Priest, King and traders profession stabilized or frozen so that poor classes can’t be the competitor to them. The great mass of Buddhist population even got certified as Shudra those don’t had priest, King and traders profession at the time of Purusha shukta implementation to different linguistic clans after 185BC. They banned education, right to equality, property, right to dignity, equal opportunity, fair life, fair and equal livelihood & justice etc. to Shudras by enforcing Brahmin’s code of Manusmriti; so that they can make them slaves for ever for which they can’t be rebellion to them in any circumstances and can’t be problem to their racial hegemony and organized benefits.



There is no definition of Hinduism in our any religious scriptures and even in our any laws though Article 25 (2)(b) of constitution and section 2 of Hindu marriage Act. 1955 recognize who are Hindus.

India’s Constitution does not give a definition of the term Hindu, but it does define to whom the Hindu Law applies.  It has to do this because in spite of its pretence to secularism, the Indian Constitution allows Muslims, Christians and Parsis a separate Personal Law.  In a way, this separate treatment of different communities merely continues the communal autonomy of castes and sects accepted in pre-modern Hindu states, but it exposes the credibility deficit of Indian secularism.  At any rate, the situation is that Personal Law is divided on the basis of religion, and that one of the legal subsystems is called Hindu Law.

Article 25 (2)(b) of the Constitution stipulates that the reference to Hindus shall be construed as including a reference to persons professing the Sikh, Jain or Buddhist religion. The Hindu Marriage Act of 1955 goes in greater detail to define this  legal Hindu, by stipulating in Section 2 that the Act applies:

Section 2 in The Hindu Marriage Act, 1955

2 Application of Act.
(1) This Act applies
(a) to any person who is a Hindu by religion in any of its forms or developments, including a Virashaiva, a Lingayat or a follower of the Brahmo, Prarthana or Arya Samaj,
(b) to any person who is a Buddhist, Jaina or Sikh by religion, and
(c) to any other person domiciled in the territories to which this Act extends who is not a Muslim, Christian, Parsi or Jew by religion, unless it is proved that any such person would not have been governed by the Hindu law or by any custom or usage as part of that law in respect of any of the matters dealt with herein if this Act had not been passed.
Explanation. The following persons are Hindus, Buddhists, Jainas or Sikhs by religion, as the case may be:
(a) any child, legitimate or illegitimate, both of whose parents are Hindus, Buddhists, Jainas or Sikhs by religion;
(b) any child, legitimate or illegitimate, one of whose parents is a Hindu, Buddhist, Jaina or Sikh by religion and who is brought up as a member of the tribe, community, group or family to which such parent belongs or belonged; and
(c) any person who is a convert or re-convert to the Hindu, Buddhist, Jaina or Sikh religion.
(2) Notwithstanding anything contained in sub-section (1), nothing contained in this Act shall apply to the members of any Scheduled Tribe within the meaning of clause (25) of Article 366 of the Constitution unless the Central Government, by notification in the Official Gazette, otherwise directs.
(3) The expression Hindu in any portion of this Act shall be construed as if it included a person who, though not a Hindu by religion, is, nevertheless, a person to whom this Act applies by virtue of the provisions contained in this section. State Amendment Pondicherry: In section 2, insert the following sub-section:(2A) Notwithstanding anything contained in sub-section (1), nothing contained in this Act shall apply to the Renoncants of the Union territory of Pondicherry . [ Vide Regn. 7 of 1963, sec. 2 and Sch. (w.e.f. 1-10-1963).]

This definition of the legal Hindu, though explicitly not equating him with the Hindu by religion, is exactly coterminous with the original Islamic use of the term Hindu: all Indian Pagans are legally Hindus.  The Buddhists, Jains and Sikhs are explicitly included in the Hindus by law but separated from the Hindus by religion: at this point, the law follows the usage established by Western scholars, contrary to the original usage.

Note that the changes in Hindu Law imposed by an Act of Parliament (on top of the very existence of separate Hindu and Muslim Law regimes) constitute a further measure of communal inequality.  The secular government would not dare to touch the other religion-based law systems, as has repeatedly been shown in the past decades regarding items of Christian and Muslim Personal Law.  An interference in Hindu Law by a national legislative body only makes sense in an avowedly Hindu state; in a sense, therefore, the Hindu Marriage Act constitutes an admission by Jawaharlal Nehru that ultimately India is a Hindu state.

India was a demography of many kingdoms till unified as a federal Nation as India. It had originated many faiths and many philosophies. Ajivika, Chauvaka, Buddhism, Jainism were the major opposer of Brahmanism/Vedism/Polytheist idolism priesthood for pagan deities with Vedic pursha shukta philosophy. Brahmanism was the major evil faith ever in this land but politicians of federal nations were major followers of Brahmanism. They put all faiths originated in this land in a single umbrella named “Hindu” which is not only stupidity but also it shows height of their nonsense and idiocy with foolishness. It was crookedly and intentionally made to promote vedic purusha shukta in our federal governance to promote Vedism. Its the reason why Brahmin, Kshatriya and Vaishya represented as General caste and Shudra as OBC and Atishudra as Sc & ST. Being only 14% of the Indian population as General caste enjoy 50.5% of reservation i.e. 50.5% seats in government reserved for general category and rest for lower caste origin i.e. 86% of Indian population enjoy only 49.5% as reserved for other non-General category.

See these Maps you can’t find any single place named “Bharat”

More than 99.99% Muslims of India, Pakistan and Bangladesh doesn’t know about their origin. Most of them thinks they are belongs to out of their countries because Islam is a foreign religion; where truth is more than 97% Muslims of India, Pakistan and Bangladesh are root natives to their own land and their linguistic race; where only 3% or less than even 3% Muslims are from other origins, but not from Arabic origin. Islamic Invaders those invaded India like Persians, Afghans and Turko-mongols once upon a time had practicing some other faiths before conversion to Islam and Invading to Indian Demography. Islamic invasion majorly happened in 700AD its because Prophet Muhammad born in 570AD and reveled his faith Islam in his forties i.e. in 609/610AD and got died in 632AD, so after 610AD his followers embraced the Islam and propagated to other land. When Islam came to our Indian demography in that time Brahmanism was the major religion, because Buddhism and other major faiths like Ajivika, Vaishesika, Charuvaka, Lokayata etc. etc. had been destroyed by Vedic promoters after 185 BC and after wards. Many kingdoms had been converted to Vedic caste systems its the reason why major population from different linguistic Kingdoms had converted to Shudra castes those had been exploited by Vedic upper castes due to their Brahmin’s code of Manusmriti. When Islam came to Indian demography they forcefully converted many root natives to Islam irrespective what they were practicing in that time. When Shudra got a better faith than even Vedism/Brahmanism many lower castes even converted themselves in to Islam; it does not mean Brahmans, Viashyas and Kshatriyas had not converted in that time. Islamic Invaders amalgamated to root natives of India and lost their origin identity but their embraced art of living style i.e. Islam became a major part of Indian race. Here everybody must remember that the founder of Islam Prophet Muhammad was a non Muslim or polytheist believer till his forties i.e. he lived as a non Muslim for 40 years and rest 22 years as Muslim. Anybody can study what he did in his 40 years and rest 22 years. His non-Muslim life was more better than his rest 22 years life as he lived as an identity of violence and sins. When his faith came to India our root natives embraced the faith only due to Vedic persecution of caste system by upper castes. So the Muslims we see in India, Pakistan and Bangladesh majorly our root natives those had converted to Islam due to faiths persecutions. Muslims of different states are only the root natives of that State or linguistic race i.e. Muslims seen in Gujarat are belongs to Gujarati linguistic clans those had converted to Islam after 700AD. Like this the Muslims seen in our different states are originally belongs to that States or linguistic race excluding interstates migrations. Andra Muslims are from Telugu linguist clans, Maharashtra Muslims are belongs to Marathi linguist clan, so on and so forth. They changed their mother tongues as Urdu due to maintaining uniformity of community in Indian Muslims. Urdu is an Indian language whose 99% verbs are from Nagari language. Muslims of different States of India were root natives to their land its the reason why they could not leave their root native land even after partition its because they didn’t have any relatives out of their root natives, but evil dirty politicians forced them to leave their own land due to their dirty political hegemony. India got divided by few politicians according to their selfish desires on the basis of major religions Hindu and Muslim for their political mileage, organized benefits and racial hegemony. The consents of the root natives had not taken in to considerations or had their plebiscites  for division. Few hegemonic crazy politicians decided what will be the name of our country, National anthem and song etc. etc. according to their favor; Is not it  political gundaism in the democracy by so called self claimed politicians of majority?

(Download this video from YouTube because some knaves criminals trying to stop promoting & spreading the truth of this video. They banned the previous video calming copyright infringement. lol If Osho had said it for social reformation and had exposed the truths about Brahmins then why it should be banned? Thousands and thousands of Osho videos are published on YouTube without the Osho international they are not violating copyright infringement but only this video violates copyright infringement which they ban often. lol If preliminarily they had intention to ban this video, then we would not have this video on public domain. The ban would have been due to suppression by  Vedic promoters/Brahmins or by their undue influences or by bribe to some stupid & Idiots Osho International employees those do not want to promote this video. Stupids, idiots and criminals resides everywhere in controlling positions those do not wants to be exposed )
 

These are only Mental disorders nothing else.

This slideshow requires JavaScript.

 

ब्राह्मणतो वेदका गुलाम है; लेकिन जो जातिबाद यानि पुरुष शुक्त को मानता है ओ ब्रह्मणोंका का गुलाम है | क्षैत्रिय भी गुलाम, बैश्य भी गुलाम और सूद्र इन सबकी गुलाम | बेदका पुरुष शुक्त हमें गुलाम बनानेका धूर्तोंका बनायाहुआ फंदा है |

Those believe in Caste system or Purusha Sukta they are all slave to Brahmins. When you worship delusional idols of Brahmins like Ganesh, Shiva-linga, Narsimha, Hanuman etc. etc. then you admits you are submitting yourself to lies, deception, illusions or delusions, discrimination, irrationality, blind beliefs and antisocial  world of Brahmins and to their hegemony or Brahmins as your BOSS.

Posted in Uncategorized | Leave a comment

Brahman Nation/ Brahman Akhand Rastra

Brahman Nation

Brahmins are only found in Indian race so; it’s no doubt Brahmin’s origin belongs to only India. If it was Arayan race or something else, then there must have been any proof outside of the country in their history or from any geographic contexts. Since we don’t found any strong proofs of this race outside of India we have to admit, it’s only belongs to Indian race. Brahmins were the only race those had promoted the Vedic fourfold caste system in Indian demography i.e. in the oldest kingdoms of India only Brahmins had implemented the caste system by hook & crook for their racial hegemony. Brahmins are not from one clan though they act as a race as Vedic social elite. Brahmins of India populates around 6 crores and their mother tongue & surnames differs changing the demography in Indian Nation. If they had one clan then they would have only one surname and one mother tongue. If we start to think that Brahmins had their own clan and they had migrated to other linguistic clans and amalgamated or hybridized with the other linguistic race those were absolutely non-Vedic caste clans, then changing of mother tongue according to the linguistic race adoption shows their death of the clan so Vedic social elite as Brahmins in any linguistic race is discarded and nullified due to loss of their own identity if it is there. For an example if an American had come 800years ago to south India and started to live in India and adopted south Indian art of living, spoke Telugu language, married to a South Indian girl and his family lived till to date in India then his descent is no more American, so we have to admit his clan identity dissolved in South Indian clan.  If we consider Brahmins had their own clan and they migrated to many linguistic race of India and adopted the language & art of living of that linguistic race for racial hegemony, then how they got opposite sex for their descendants? In this case they must have been chosen females of non-Vedic clans. If Vedic clan had their own surname, then all Brahmins would have only one surname; but we don’t get one surname as whole Brahmins shows they had not one clan. In case if they had one clan as Brahmins but they had many surnames then who was that single authority that had maintained the all the surnames of single clan? Maintaining many surnames as one class even baseless for single origin. In last case we have to admit it’s the self-claimed special group of peoples form different clans recognizing themselves or certifying themselves as social elite for single ideology and for organized benefits. It’s the reason why Brahmanism is organized priesthood from different linguistic race certifying themselves as social elite as Brahmins to dominate their own linguistic clan and total demography as organized with a single philosophy of Vedic caste system. It’s the reason why more than thousands of surnames found in Indian Brahmanic racial group though their demography & language differs to each other but with a same ideology i.e. priesthood with Vedic chants & Vedic practices. Priest without Vedic chants or Vedic practices are not Brahmins by Caste or as social group but well said as only Poojari/ Poojaka or just idol care takers or worshipers. Any devotee of Indian deities or idol worshiper can be Poojari but not Brahmin till he himself uplift to that level or other Brahmin priest group certify him the status of Brahmins. We can say Idol worshipers those had adopted Vedic ideology of priesthood, certified themselves Brahmins and promoted caste system are only called as the Brahmins of India which has no single origin but organize ideology for organized benefits to fool and rule the society as elite group though Vedic clan of India or Brahmins had originated the theory of Brahmanism & caste system. Vedic caste system had promoted by only one clan i.e. Vedic clan;  Vedic clan was a race of Sanskrit linguistic race. Other  linguistic races just had adopted the ideology and used the ideology in their races in translated forms. So other than Sanskrit linguistic race i.e. those don’t have Sanskrit as their mother tongue and only has the adoption of the Vedic philosophy has no connection of any kind with Sanskrit linguistic clan of any kind without the Vedic clan hegemony to their own linguistic clan.  For an example a Telugu linguistic race has no connection with Sanskrit linguistic race but Caste system or Brahmins can be found in their linguistic race, because of only adoption of the Vedic philosophy or implementation of vedic philosophy in their linguistic race. This Brahmins elite ideology is the most heinous ideology in Indian race and stagnated the India till to date for dominating and discriminating its own natives in their own land. We can say crooks of the different linguistic clans (Like Hindi, Maharashtrian, Telugu, Bihari, Punjabi, Odian etc. linguistic races) uplifted or certified themselves according Purusha Shukta 10:90 as Brahmins to rule not only their own clan but also whole demography as organized race. They migrated to other linguistic race to help other Brahmins for racial hegemony. Its the reason why Brahmanism is a race of crooks though few descendants from them might be not feeling the same ideology due to rational development in them. The Brahmanism ideology had developed in different linguistic races rapidly after the declining of Buddhism in Mauryan empire. Before the regime of Pushyamitra Shunga you can’t find there was any caste system or any kind of Brahmanism had existed in their linguistic race except Vedic race which was a negligible clan of Indian demography. Brahmanism is the root cause of social disharmony and human discrimination with thousands of other social evils. Vedic ideology violates human rights and the ideology of caste system is totally inhumanity.

Now India has been started to knowing about the vices of Brahmins to Indian race and their evil contribution to Indian society till to date rapidly due to information technology. The race of Brahmins is full of con-artists i.e. crooks and in psychological language full of sociopaths & psychopaths. We can say crook Brahmins are honey coated poisons and elite or honest masked criminals. These are the real evils of the Nation and more dangerous than even invaders, terrorists and other hardcore criminals.  If Brahmins had not their then there would not any division of India. Brahmins are the root reasons of division of India. If Brahmins had not there, then there would not decline of Buddhism in India so Buddhism would have been the major religion till to date. If there was Buddhism, then there would not any caste system so there might not have conversion of Vedic lower caste to Islam in Islamic regime. Islamic ruler was more tolerant than even Brahmanism empire it’s because they had not destroyed the whole Vedic followers; now known as Hindus though they ruled about 900yrs to Indian race. Brahmin started to rule Ashokan Buddhist empire which is now known as India after 185BC and Islam came to India about in 700AD i.e. Brahmanism philosophy majorly ruled the kingdoms for 885years till Islamic ruler invaded kingdoms of India. Brahmins took over the Ashoka or Mauryan empire after 185BC and abolished totally to Buddhism in India within this 885years but even with the 900years cruel rulers of Islam had not destroyed totally to other religions of India it’s the reason why Hinduism is still a major religion in India. In this regard we can say Brahmins are the more extremist or cruel & crook than Islam. From the 6 crore Brahmins all might not be not crooks but 20% are not only crooks but also control India in evil ways, because 20% Brahmins are wealthiest & well established in this 6 crore Brahmins. More than 80% of Brahmins i.e. 4.8 Crore Brahmins are just ego paranoid social elite and their standard of living is even worse than other non-Brahmins Castes. May be some of them need social reservations for uplifting their   living standard. Now if these 6 crore Brahmins will be departed from India as Muslims departed as Pakistan & Bangladesh then many social evils will be solved to some extent. They will have new country like Pakistan & Bangladesh may be named as “Brahmansthan” or “Land of Brahmins” or “Akhand Brahman Rajya” or “Akhand Brahman Rastra” or “Bhrahman Bharat” or “Brahmisthan” or may be something like this but it will be wisest decision to depart all Brahmins from India to maintain harmony in the Nation. According to Vedic fourfold caste system mentioned in Purusha Shukta 10:90 India is divided according to four castes and other religious groups. Let it be in an approximate calculation from 130 Crore Indian populations, 104 Crores are Hindus (about 80%), 18.2 Crore are Muslims (about 14%) and rest 6% i.e. about 7.8 crore citizens are from other religious and non-religious group. No other than Brahmins with some so called brainwashed Kshatriyas and Vaishyas only promote caste system. From these 104 Crore Hindu population only 6crores are Brahmins, less than 1 Crore are original Kshatriyas (descents from any Kings family) and less than 7-10 Crores are Vedic Vaishyas, so altogether they will be about 14-17 Crore as upper castes and rest more than 87-90 Crore are Vedic lower castes as OBC, Sc & ST etc. Since Brahmins dominates even Kshatriyas and Vaishya they even may have the choice to decline Vedic caste system. Brahmins can profess as Kshatriya i.e. as Kings & Vaishya i.e. as traders but no Kshatriya & Vaishya can be Brahmins. It means in even upper caste there is violation of human rights and domination of upper castes. We can say Kshatriyas & Vaishya are upper caste stupids those help promoting inhuman Vedic caste system for their stupidity with crook Brahmins for some organized social benefits. If Brahmins can be departed from our nation, then whole social discrimination problem can be solved easily and country will be united as secular union without any disharmony and discrimination. If 6 crores will be privileged to make their own Nation as Brahman country and departed from 124 crore peoples, then Indian problem is solved. Think what will happen once Brahman nation is created. The nation will be only race of Brahmins. Think what will happen to their social harmony? Who will do the lower caste jobs they had assigned to lower castes? like garbage sweeping, latrine cleaning, cloth washing, shoe making etc. etc. think about it. Let them divide themselves as sweeper Brahmins, Brahmin washer men, Brahmin shoe makers or cobbler Brahmins etc. etc. They will even divide themselves again and will play “divide and rule” in their own clan. How they will maintain Brahmanism in their own Nation will be the lesson to learn. In conclusion I want to say If Brahmins will be departed from our land then they will divide even themselves it’s because they are only the root reason for divide and rule in our Nation where root cause is Vedic fourfold caste system or Purusha Shukta 10:90.

Brahman Nation

Brahmins Exposed by Ambedkar supporter.  The first PM of India Kashmir Brahmin Mr. Jawaharlal Nehru became the PM without any election. The First Lok Sabha was constituted on 17 April 1952 after India‘s first general election but Jawaharlal Nehru hold the office from 15 August 1947 without any democratic election process.

Drive Away Brahmins from India
They are only less than 6 Crores
And real enemies of the Nation.
Brahmins are Dangerous than even Invaders.

3%-5% Brahmins devastating the lives of 97% root natives of India. Its better to depart them as other Nation like Pakistan.

India should be the Brahminless country.

If you study about Brahmins then one can easily find they are not from any single clan but are from different linguistic clans as single ideology of Vedism to promote caste system making them as prime social elite as Brahmins. Its the reason why their mother tongue and surname changes changing the lingustic clans & demography in India. We can say majorly crooks of all clans promoting them as Brahmins or social elite those had once or presently has  profession of idol worshiping as Poojari and adopted the Brahmanism i.e. Purusha Shukta 10:90  due to Vedic Brahmins rule by Pushyamitra Shunga regime declining Buddhism. Brahmanism is an organized Vedic ideological race those wants to dominate all the  Indians, i.e. dominating the Governance, Media, literature, history, entertainment and everything that controls life of a person in Indian society. Brahmanism is only an organized race of crooks from different linguistic clans named as Vedic social elites/Brahmins and act like boss to all non-brahmins. Its the reason why Brahmins are the race of crooks those wants racial hegemony in India.

Think what will happen if 6 crores Brahmins will be departed as their own nation? If their will be a Brahmin Nation then their will be so called equality of social dignity or surnames but what about dignity according to their discriminated professions? Due to absence of other castes they have to make grains, they have to make clothes and oil press. They have to make their latrine clean and wash their clothes etc. etc. Will they themselves discriminate to each other? If you study Brahmins caste itself, then Brahmins even discriminate themselves according to their distributed professions so definitely they will create again discrimination dividing their own Brahmins race according to their adopted profession. They may divide themselves as Brhamins, Brahmin Kshatriya, Brahmin Vaishya and Brhamin Shudra. If other two upper castes will be departed as Kshtriya Nation & Vaishya Nation then same thing can be expected from their race. So Vedic ideology is evil to our Indian race. Vedic ideology or Purusha shukta 10:90 is the root reasons of discrimination in Indian society and root cause of thousand so social evils. Vedic ideologies violates the human rights; its the reason why we have to first decline Purusha Shukta 10:90 in Indian society and depart the promoters of Vedism from India.

WE MUST DECLINE  PURUSHA SUKTA 10:90

WE MUST DEPART BRAHMANS BECAUSE THEY DON’T BELIEVE IN INDIAN CONSTITUTION

ब्राह्मणतो वेदका गुलाम है; लेकिन जो जातिबाद यानि पुरुष शुक्त को मानता है ओ ब्रह्मणोंका का गुलाम है | क्षैत्रिय भी गुलाम, बैश्य भी गुलाम और सूद्र इन सबकी गुलाम | बेदका पुरुष शुक्त हमें गुलाम बनानेका धूर्तोंका बनायाहुआ फंदा है |

Those believe in Caste system or Purusha Sukta they are slave to Brahmins.

Posted in Uncategorized | Leave a comment

What is “Bharat?”

  1. NAME OF OUR COUNTRY IS “BHARAT” WHEN IT TRANSLATED FROM ENGLISH TO HINDI.
  2. NO ONE ASKED, WHY INDIA BECOMES “BHARAT” WHEN IT TRANSLATED TO HINDI?
  3. NAME NEVER CHANGES ITS PHONETICS WHEN CHANGED TO ANY LANGUAGE. IF NAME OF A PERSON IS “KRISHNA”, WHEN IT TRANSLATED TO ANY LANGUAGE IT REMAINS “KRISHNA” NOT “RAMA.”
  4. THERE IS NO AUTHENTIC MEANING OF NAME “BHARAT.”
  5. IF “MAHABHARAT” MEANS “BIG WAR” THEN BHARAT=WAR.
  6. IF “BAHARAT” IS A NAME, THEN WHAT IS THE MEANING OF “BIG NAME?” FOR AN EXAMPLE, IF “RAMA” IS A NAME OF A PERSON THEN WHAT IS THE MEANING OF “MAHA RAMA?” THEN WHAT IS THE MEANING OF RSS SLOGAN “BHARAT MATA KI JAY?”
  7. IF “BAHARAT” IS A NAME OF A MAN, THEN WHAT IS THE MEANING OF “BHARAT MATA?”
  8. THERE IS NO EVIDENCE EXISTS THE LARGEST UNIFIED KINGDOM EVER MADE IN THIS DEMOGRAPHY RELATING TO NAME “BHARAT”
  1. THERE IS NO EVIDENCE EXISTS THE NAME OF THE PRESENT INDIA WAS BHARAT.
  2. ISLAM AND BRITISH EMPERORS NEVER USED ANY NAME BHARAT FOR THEIR RULED KINGDOM.
  3. PRESENT INDIA WAS A DEMOGRAPHY OF MORE THAN 500 KINGDOMS TILL 1947 AND EACH KINGDOMS HAD THEIR OWN NAME, THEN WHERE THE NAME “BHARAT” STREAMED?
  1. THE LARGEST UNIFIED KINGDOM EVER MADE IN THIS DEMOGRAPHY WAS MAURYAN EMPIRE. MAURYAN EMPIRE WAS A SECULAR BUDDHIST KINGDOM.
  2. BHARAT NAME USED OFFICIALLY AFTER 1947 FOR INDIA AND NAME HAD PROPOSED BY HINDU ORGANIZATION.
  3. BHARAT NAME HAD MAJORLY PROMOTED BY JANA SANGH NOW KNOWN AS BJP.
  4. THERE ARE SUFFICIENT PROOFS EXISTS THE BRAHMIN RADICAL HINDU ACTIVIST VINAYAK DAMODAR SAVARKAR HAD COINED THE NAME “BHARAT.” ABHINAV BHARAT SOCIETY (YOUNG INDIA SOCIETY) WAS A SECRET SOCIETY FOUNDED BY VINAYAK DAMODAR SAVARKAR AND HIS BROTHER GANESH DAMODAR SAVARKAR IN 1903. GODSE, AS INVESTIGATIONS AFTER GANDHI’S MURDER WERE TO REVEAL, APPEARS TO HAVE BEEN CLOSE TO SAVARKAR, A PROMINENT LEADER OF THE HINDU MAHASABHA. EVEN A CURSORY GLANCE AT THE TRAJECTORY OF THE HINDU MAHASABHA UNDER THE LEADERSHIP OF SAVARKAR OR THE WAY IN WHICH THE RSS UNFOLDED ITSELF DURING THOSE DAYS MAKES IT QUITE CLEAR THAT THE DIFFERENCES IN PRIORITIES BETWEEN THE TWO ORGANISATIONS WERE ALREADY VISIBLE FROM THE DAY SAVARKAR WAS ELECTED PRESIDENT OF THE HINDU MAHASABHA AFTER HIS RELEASE FROM JAIL IN1937.
  5. THE PROMOTER OF “BHARAT” WAS DEENDAYAL UPADHYAYA. HE WAS ONE OF THE MOST IMPORTANT LEADERS OF THE BHARATIYA JANA SANGH, THE FORERUNNER OF THE PRESENT DAY BHARATIYA JANATA PARTY.
  6. DEENDAYAL UPADHYAYA WAS IMPORTANT MEMBER OF “RSS AND JANA SANGH.”
  7. ADOPTING NAME “BHARAT” FOR OUR CONSTITUTION AND NAME OF OUR COUNTRY FROM “RSS, HINDU MAHASABHA AND JANA SANGH” ORIGIN IMPLICATES INCLINATION OF CONGRESS & NEHRU TO “RSS, HINDU MAHASABHA AND JANA SANGH.” SO IN OTHER WAY WE CAN SAY NEHRU ALSO WAS A PART OF GANDHI MURDER CONSPIRACY.
  8. ALL THESE PERSON INVOLVED IN NAMING, DOMINATING AND PERSECUTING INDIAN DEMOCRACY WERE RADICAL BRAHMINS.
  1. ALL THESE PROVES INDIA HAD PERSECUTED BY RADICAL BRAHMINS AFTER 185BC AND STILL GETTING PERSECUTED BY THESE RADICAL BRAHMINS STAGNATING INDIA. SO YOU COULD HAVE UNDERSTOOD WHY SANGH PARIVAR ADVOCATES ABOUT HINDU NATIONALISM, HINDU RASTRA AND “BHARAT MATA KI JAY.”

ALL POPULAR MEDIAS ARE EITHER OWNED BY BRAHMINS OR RUN OR CONTROLLED BY BRAHMINS. YOU CAN SEE EVEN THEIR SURNAMES WHEN THEY MENTION THEIR NAMES IN DIFFERENT MEDIAS. TOP FIVE CORRUPT MEDIAS ARE AAJ TAK, ABP, ZEE NEWS, INDIA TV, INDIA NEWS ETC. MAJOR PRINT MEDIAS ARE EVEN OWNED BY RADICAL ORTHODOX BRAHMINS. OUR HOME DEPARTMENT, JUDICIARY, ARMY, LEGISLATIVE AND EXECUTIVE ALL ARE DOMINATED AND CONTROLLED BY CORRUPT, RADICAL ORTHODOX BRAHMINS. YOU CAN EVEN FIND AGENTS/MEMBERS OF RSS IN ALL SECTIONS OF OUR GOVERNANCE THOSE CONTROL OUR NATION WITHOUT THE NOTICE OF COMMON CITIZENS.

BHARAT IS NAME OF HEGEMONY

THERE IS NO EVIDENCE THERE WAS ANY KINGDOM NAMED BHARAT IN PAST HISTORY OR THERE WAS A MAN WHO HAD CONQUERED THE WHOLE KINGDOMS IN THAT ERA AND RULED THE PRESENT DEMOGRAPHY NAMED BHARAT. BHARAT NAME NEVER USED IN ANY SCRIPTURE EVEN IN OUR INDIAN SCRIPTURES OTHER THAN “MAHABHARAT.” THE MEANING OF MAHABHARAT HAS NO RELATION WITH A NAME OF DEMOGRAPHY OR A PERSON; THEN WHY SHOULD IT BE NAMED TO OUR “FEDERAL UNION, AS OFFICIAL NAME?” BEFORE THE BRITISH AND ISLAMIC RULE EVEN NO EVIDENCE THAT ANYONE USED THE NAME “BHARAT” FOR ANY KINGDOM. BRITISH HAD NEVER GIVEN THE NAME OF INDIA ACCORDING TO THEIR WISH OR WITH ANY ABSURD ORIGINS. IN THE AGE OF KINGDOMS & AGE OF EXPLORATION OUR DEMOGRAPHY OF KINGDOMS WERE NAMED ACCORDING TO THE RIVER SHINDU/INDU/INDUS/INDIES (SHINDHU/SHINDU IS NOT A NAME ACTUALLY IT MEANS RIVER) AND MANY EUROPEANS WERE RECOGNIZING OUR DEMOGRAPHY AS INDIA SO BRITISH NAMED THEIR RULED DEMOGRAPHY AS INDIA BECAUSE BRITISH WERE EUROPEANS. PERSIAN/IRANIAN, AFGHANIAN OR PEOPLE FROM ARABIC ORIGIN WERE DESIGNATING OUR DEMOGRAPHY ACCORDING TO THE GIGANTIC RIVER I.E. SHINDHU/SHINDU; SO DUE TO THEIR WRONG PRONUNCIATION OF “SHINDU” IT BECAME HINDU; ITS THE REASON WHY THEY NAMED THEIR RULED KINGDOMS AS AL-HIND OR HINDUSTAN. HINDU MAHASABHA AND RSS ETC.  ARE THE ORGANIZATIONS OF RADICAL/ORTHODOX/EXTREMIST HEGEMONIC BRAHMINS THOSE PROMOTE VEDISM (CASTE/VARNA SYSTEM AND THEIR IDEOLOGY I.E. MANUSMRITI) IN THE NAME OF HINDUISM. VEDISM IS NOT HINDUISM. VEDISM IS CREATED BY SELF CLAIMED ELITE GROUP NAMED BRAHMINS THOSE PROMOTE FOURFOLD CASTE SYSTEM I.E. PURUSHA SUKTA AND IDOLISM. THOSE PROMOTE THEMSELVES AS BRAHMINS DECLINING EQUALITY OF HUMANS OR DECLINING EQUALITY OF HUMAN DIGNITY PROVING PROMOTING VEDISM.  VEDISM IS AGAINST THE RIGHTS OF EQUALITY AND HUMAN DIGNITY SO VIOLATING THE HUMAN RIGHTS. VEDISM EVEN PROMOTES HUMAN DISCRIMINATION, IRRATIONALITY, VIOLENCE AND BLIND BELIEFS. NO HINDU ORGANIZATION EVER TRIED TO DECLINE VEDIC CASTE SYSTEM ACCEPTING FREEDOM OF SURNAMES OR MARRYING LOWER CASTES WITHOUT ANY HESITATIONS OR ACCEPTING LOWER CASTE SURNAMES OR GIVING THE POSITION OF BRAHMINS TO THEIR CERTIFIED LOWER CASTES. EVEN THEIR CERTIFIED TWO UPPER CASTES I.E. KSHATRIYAS & VAISHYAS CAN’T BE CONVERTED IN TO BRAHMINS. VEDISM EVEN DO NOT GIVE RIGHTS TO CASTE CONVERSION IN ITS OWN RELIGION VIOLATING RIGHTS TO EQUALITY. WHY WE SHOULD ACCEPT NAME GIVEN BY A RADICAL BRAHMIN “BHARAT” AS OUR NATION’S OFFICIAL NAME? WHERE ORIGIN OF THE NAME ITSELF IS EVEN FAKE, FEELS LIKE HEGEMONIC AND INTENTIONS ARE EVEN BAD! INDIA WAS AN UNION BY BRITISH THOSE HAD CAME TO OUR LAND IN 1600AD, BUT THE NAME “BHARAT” USED AS OUR UNION NAME AFTER 1947AD DUE TO RADICAL/ORTHODOX OR EXTREMIST IRRATIONAL HEGEMONIC VEDIC  IDEOLOGY. EVERY INDIAN SHOULD KNOW THE ORIGIN OF NAME “BHARAT” AND “INDIA.”

THESE HISTORICAL MAPS CAN HELP YOU TO UNDERSTAND WHAT WAS THE REAL SITUATION. YOU CAN’T FIND ANY NAME “BHARAT” USED FOR EVEN ANY PLACE.
    

Brahmins Exposed by a Ambedkar supporter.  The first PM of India Kashmir Brahmin Mr. Jawaharlal Nehru became the PM without any election. The First Lok Sabha was constituted on 17 April 1952 after India‘s first general election but Jawaharlal Nehru hold the office from 15 August 1947 without any democratic election process.

Drive Away Brahmins from India
They are only less than 6 Crores
And real enemies of the Nation.
Brahmins are Dangerous than even Invaders.

3%-5% Brahmins devastating the lives of 97% root natives of India. Its better to depart them as other Nation like Pakistan.

India should be the Brahminless country.

Conspiracy behind Promotion of  “बन्दे मातरम्” by RSS

Sanskrit is not our National language though we have Nagari i.e. well known as Hindi  is the major used language of the nation; Its the reason why it is our national language. Here everybody should know Sanskrit is mother of all Indian language is a fake claim by hegemonic Brahmans and their writers to delude Indians. India has 122 major languages and more than 1600 other languages. Sanskrit language is one from them. This language has no connection with Hindi. Hindi actually named to “DevNagari/DebaNagari” where “DevNagari/DebaNagari” are prefixed by “Dev/Deba” by Brahmins for hegemonic to the language by fabrication. Its Actually Naagari/Nagari i.e. language of a city or Nagar which was a popular language in medieval India and probably a major popular language of Ashokan and Gupta empire. Vedic Brahmins only used Sanskrit language as their mother tongue because all Vedas are composed of only Sanskrit. When Vedic Brahmans like Pushyamitra Shunga devastated the Buddhist empire of India they Sanskritized everything for their racial hegemony, so  it is fabricated to DevNagari/DebaNagari prefixing Dev/Deba to it. When Islam Invaded India after 700AD they renamed the major language Naagari/Nagari/DevNagari/DebaNagari as Hindi. Sanskrit has not their own alphabets till to date so they use Nagari/DevNagari for their Vedas inscription. Urdu is nothing but it evolved from the medieval 7th to 13th century in India under the supervision of Islamic hegemony. Urdu developed under the influence of the Persian and Arabic languages, both of which have contributed a significant amount of vocabulary to formal speech. Around 99% of Urdu verbs have their roots in Nagari. Nagari roots to Pali not Sanskrit. Bande matarm is written in Sanskrit i.e. Language of Vedic Brahmins those has been implemented fourfold caste system to this demography for their racial hegemoney and Brahmins of the country promoted the language being their executives. RSS is an orthodox theopolitical organization of Brahmins and has an evil intention making India as solely Brahmin dominated Nation as before. Promoting “बन्दे मातरम्” & “Bharat Mata” is an evil intention of these Brahmins to dominate India according to their own wish. Why “बन्दे मातरम्” is not written in Hindi though Hindi is our National language? Why Indians has to follow Brahmins order to proof their Nationalism? Its time to depart Brahmins from India as orthodox Muslims departed themselves as Pakistan.

Truth about Brahmins Intentions

WHEN NATIONAL ANTHEM HAD WROTE BY TWO LYRICIST TAGORE AND IQBAL THERE WAS ALSO CONFLICT NAMING THE NATION NAME. TAGORE USED THE HINDU MAHASVA SELECTED NAME “BHARAT” AND IQBAL USED THE NAME “HINDUSTAN” AT LAST BRAHMINS SELECTED NAME GIVEN TO OUR COUNTRY AND NAMED AS BHARAT. THERE WAS NO PLEBISCITES FOR NAMING OUR NATION NAME.

TAGORE’S LYRICS:

जन-गण-मन अधिनायक जय हे
भारत-भाग्य-विधाता
पंजाब-सिन्ध-गुजरात-मराठा
द्राविड़-उत्कल-बंग
विन्ध्य-हिमाचल, यमुना-गंगा
उच्छल जलधि तरंग
तव शुभ नामे जागे
तव शुभ आशिष मांगे
गाहे तव जय गाथा
जन-गण-मंगलदायक जय हे
भारत-भाग्य-विधाता
जय हे, जय हे, जय हे
जय-जय-जय, जय हे

पतन-अभ्युदय-वन्धुर-पंथा
युग-युग धावित यात्री
हे चिर-सारथी
तव रथचक्रे मुखरित पथ दिन-रात्रि
दारुण विप्लव-माँझे
तव शंखध्वनि बाजे
संकट-दुख-श्राता
जन-गण-पथ-परिचायक जय हे
भारत-भाग्य-विधाता
जय हे, जय हे, जय हे
जय-जय-जय, जय हे

घोर-तिमिर-घन-निविड़-निशीथ
पीड़ित मूर्च्छित-देशे
जागृत दिल तव अविचल मंगल
नत-नत-नयन अनिमेष
दुस्वप्ने आतंके
रक्षा करिजे अंके
स्नेहमयी तुमि माता
जन-गण-मन-दुखत्रायक जय हे
भारत-भाग्य-विधाता
जय हे, जय हे, जय हे
जय-जय-जय, जय हे

रात्रि प्रभातिल उदिल रविच्छवि
पूरब-उदय-गिरि-भाले
साहे विहंगम, पूर्ण समीरण
नव-जीवन-रस ढाले
तव करुणारुण-रागे
निद्रित भारत जागे
तव चरणे नत माथा
जय-जय-जय हे, जय राजेश्वर
भारत-भाग्य-विधाता
जय हे, जय हे, जय हे
जय-जय-जय, जय हे

– रबीन्द्रनाथ टैगोर

WE USE ITS EDITED VERSION:

जन गण मन अधिनायक जय हे
भारत भाग्य विधाता
पंजाब सिन्ध गुजरात मराठा
द्रविड़ उत्कल बंग
विंध्य हिमाचल यमुना गंगा
उच्छल जलधि तरंग
तव शुभ नामे जागे
तव शुभ आशिष मांगे
गाये तव जयगाथा
जन गण मंगलदायक जय हे
भारत भाग्य विधाता
जय हे जय हे जय हे
जय जय जय जय हे

Sare Jahan se Accha by Muhammad Iqbal who is now spiritual father of Pakistan.

सारे जहाँ से अच्छा हिन्दोसिताँ हमारा
हम बुलबुलें हैं इसकी यह गुलसिताँ हमारा

ग़ुर्बत में हों अगर हम, रहता है दिल वतन में
समझो वहीं हमें भी दिल हो जहाँ हमारा

परबत वह सबसे ऊँचा, हम्साया आसमाँ का
वह संतरी हमारा, वह पासबाँ हमारा

गोदी में खेलती हैं इसकी हज़ारों नदियाँ
गुल्शन है जिनके दम से रश्क-ए-जनाँ हमारा

ऐ आब-ए-रूद-ए-गंगा! वह दिन हैं याद तुझको?
उतरा तिरे किनारे जब कारवाँ हमारा

मज़्हब नहीं सिखाता आपस में बैर रखना
हिंद्वी हैं हम, वतन है हिन्दोसिताँ हमारा

यूनान-ओ-मिस्र-ओ-रूमा सब मिट गए जहाँ से
अब तक मगर है बाक़ी नाम-ओ-निशाँ हमारा

कुछ बात है कि हस्ती मिटती नहीं हमारी
सदियों रहा है दुश्मन दौर-ए-ज़माँ हमारा

इक़्बाल! कोई महरम अपना नहीं जहाँ में
मालूम क्या किसी को दर्द-ए-निहाँ हमारा!

Clearly we can see the contradiction of naming our nation in their lyrics. One was trying to impose Islamic hegemony and another tried and got success imposing their ideology naming it to Vedic/Brahmanic hegemony.

If we change the Tagore’s lyrics changing few words then it will be also non-controversial and widely acceptable by all Indians without any contradictions as below.

जन गण मन स्वतंत्रता जय हे
जनतंत्र भाग्य विधाता
जन गण ऐक्य स्वराज्य जय हे
जनतंत्र भाग्य विधाता
जन गण पथ परिचायक जय हे
जनतंत्र भाग्य विधाता
तव शुभ नामे जागे
तव शुभ आशिष मांगे
गाये तव जयगाथा
जन गण मंगलदायक जय हे
जनतंत्र भाग्य विधाता
जय हे जय हे जय हे
जय जय जय जय हे

Posted in Uncategorized | Tagged , , , , , , , , | Leave a comment

Major fabrications by Brahmins.

Brahmins has been fabricating the real work or different linguistic race in their favor from their race of hegemony. They prefixed and post fixed many favored terminologies with their name to promote their race and for racial hegemony under the ground of literature and history hegemony. They mostly use the word bed/ved, dev/deb, bra, brahm, brahma, bramhi, bramhana, brahman etc. as prefix or postfix to real work of different linguistic race of India. They translated many works of different linguistic race to Sanskrit and claimed its all their intellectual property as root origin where itself they theft the intellectual properties of other linguistic race and fabricated the original source. They not only fabricated the intellectual properties even they fabricated identity & history of other original sources. Like this “Ayurgyan” fabricated as “Ayurved.” Ayurgyan has no relation with Veda or Vedas, it’s the Indian herbal medicinal knowledge from decades but they bag it in to their favor post fixing “veda” to “Ayur.” Caraka-Saṃhitā  & Suśruta-saṃhitā both are from the Buddhist origin; so Ayurgyan even was composition work of Buddhism but had fabricated by Brahmanism to promote Vedism renaming it as “Ayurveda.” Many intellectual think tanks of ancient India from different linguistic race were known as Sadhu, Rishi and Munis but they were not all Brahmins or promoters of Brahmanism or vedism. An intelligent think tank will never troll violence, lies, irrationality, injustice, blind belief, discrimination, deceptions, delusions and stupidity. You can find thousands of examples like this. So never trust Brahmanic literature & history. You can find many irrational & baseless facts or full of lies and bluffed based articles or literatures trolling all over in our Indian race, on internet, even in Wikipedia by Bramhanic writers or Brahmin inspired and influenced writers, but you have to accept the knowledge according to your rational interpretations. Most of them are only bluffs, lies, blind beliefs, irrationality and fabrications. Never believe instantly Brahmanism literatures & history those are written by them or written in the direction or influence of Brahmins; most of them are honey coated sweet lies & fabrications. But after keen observations and analysis, when you find that anything agrees with reasons and truths after your proper interpretations then accept it. Brahmins even fake claimed about the letters used in Ashoka pillars as “Brahmi” where there is no reason exists why its Brahmi? Why a Brahmanism hater use “Brahmi” in his stone inscription? If Brahmi letters were there, then why Vedas were not translated to Brahmi? Brahmi word prominently streamed from the word “Bramha or Brahmana” terminology. Today’s Hindi or Devnagari is originally Nagari which is prefixed by Dev by Brahmins oligarchs for racial hegemony. There is no word “Hindu” or “Hindi” exist in Indian scriptures till Islamic invaders invaded India. Islamic emperors propagated the word “Hindu” and largest spoken language “Nagri/Nagari” renamed as Hindi and Brahmins copyrighted to it, as their intellectual property. Nagari is nothing but popular language of Ashokan empire which has root to language Pali. Brahmin made Nagari to Devanagari and translated the Veda in this language. Sanskrit linguistic race had not developed their own alphabets it’s the reason why we don’t get any Vedic inscription emblem from oldest contexts. They just bluffed and hyped Sanskrit and Vedas are oldest and others are streamed from Sanskrit. India has 122 major languages and more than 1599 other languages. No instrument or tool is there to detect which is oldest one. If we take consideration to popular languages as the most frequently used language and from oldest origin due to its popularity then Sanskrit has only 14,135 people those reported Sanskrit as their native language in the 2001 census of India. If we consider with an argument with the time civilization & language disappears then it’s also not fit for Sanskrit; because even giving favor to Brahmanism and Vedic Civilization Sanskrit still not a popular language which shows, it’s just one language from thousands linguistic race of India but not a major language. Sanskrit has importance in our race only due to Brahmins hegemony because vedic dictators used the Sanskrit langue as their mother tongue. Nobody can proof our deities or historic identities Shiva, Rama, Krishna was talking in Sanskrit language or their mother tongue was Sanskrit. Chanting in Sanskrit to Hindu deities is only a hegemony of Vedic Brahmins to pagan deities of different linguistic race to fool and rule their followers. Rama belongs to UP so his mother tongue may be from one of the language used by Uttar Pradesh civilization i.e. major native languages of the state being Nagari,  Awadhi, Bhojpuri, Bundeli, Braj Bhasha, Kannauji and the vernacular form of Khariboli. Krishna belongs to Yadu or Yadav clan so he is a prime identity from Bihar it’s because Yadav are prime race from Bihar so his mother tongue may be Nagri, Bhojpuri, Maithili, Magahi, Bajjika, or Angika. Shiva is a prime identity from Himalayan region because most of his artistic impression portrayed with Himalaya and many Indian scriptures also claims he is from Kiratian race. The Kirat or Kirati or Kiranti or Kirant people are indigenous ethnic groups of the Himalayas extending eastward from Nepal into India, Bangladesh, Burma and beyond. So mother tongue of Shiva may be from one language spoken in these linguistic race. All these identities take major roles in our Indian religious scriptures as life guiders where in truth most of them are just used as lead character for creating moral fictions with rare truths to guide the lives of their followers.

indian-herbal-medicineayurgyanchanakyahacking-by-brahminshackingof-godsbramhishiva executivesofgod-brahminsfool-brahmin-panditsbrahmin-originality

ARE THESE ELEMENTS HAS SENSES THOSE LISTEN OR REALIZE  THEIR CHANTS? THEY NOT ONLY FOOL THEMSELVES BUT ALSO MAKING OTHERS FOOL, DELUDE AND MENTALLY DISORDERED.

purusha-shukta-final hindusim-business panditbribe bramha urinatingstandard-of-livingKEEP EXPLORING YOU WILL BE GETTING MORE DEMERITS OF BRAHMINS…..

If you study about Brahmins then one can easily find they are not from any single clan but are from different linguistic clans as single ideology of Vedism to promote caste system making them as prime social elite as Brahmins. Its the reason why their mother tongue and surname changes changing the lingustic clans & demography in India. We can say majorly crooks of all clans promoting them as Brahmins or social elite those had once or presently has  profession of idol worshiping as Poojari and adopted the Brahmanism i.e. Purusha Shukta 10:90  due to Vedic Brahmins rule by Pushyamitra Shunga regime declining Buddhism. Brahmanism is an organized Vedic ideological race those wants to dominate all the  Indians, i.e. dominating the Governance, Media, literature and everything that controls life of a person in Indian society.

Think what will happen if 6 crores Brahmins will be departed as their own nation? If their will be a Brahmin Nation then their will be so called equality of social dignity or surnames but what about dignity according to their discriminated professions? Due to absence of other castes they have to make grains, they have to make clothes and oil press. They have to make their latrine clean and wash their clothes etc. etc. Will they themselves discriminate to each other? If you study Brahmins caste itself, then Brahmins even discriminate themselves according to their distributed professions so definitely they will create again discrimination dividing their own Brahmins race according to their adopted profession. They may divide themselves as Brhamins, Brahmin Kshatriya, Brahmin Vaishya and Brhamin Shudra. If other two upper castes will be departed as Kshtriya Nation & Vaishya Nation then same thing can be expected from their race. So Vedic ideology is evil to our Indian race. Vedic ideology or Purusha shukta 10:90 is the root reasons of discrimination in Indian society and root cause of thousand so social evils. Vedic ideologies violates the human rights; its the reason why we have to first decline Purusha Shukta 10:90 in Indian society and depart the promoters of Vedism from India.

Posted in Uncategorized | Leave a comment

Hegemony of Brahmanism or crook Game of Vedism

The race of a “group of people” recognized through their language not by their adopted art of livings. Art of living or religion can be change with time spans but it’s hard to change their mother tongue. Language is the major proof of a race to trace their origin, where religion is only optional. Many linguistic race can be found who had changed their religion or art of living or their faith system according to polarization of human created so called faith system by an individual or groups through social conformity with the time. The linguistic race is the prime identity of a race after that their faith or religion, tradition, custom and heritage. India has 122 major languages and more than 1599 other languages. However, figures from other sources vary, primarily due to differences in definition of the terms “language” and “dialect”. The 2001 Census recorded 30 languages which were spoken by more than a million native speakers and 122 which were spoken by more than 10,000 people. Two contact languages have played an important role in the history of India: Persian and English. Persian was the court language during the Mughal period in India. It reigned as an administrative language for several centuries until the era of British colonization. Up until now, English is an important language in India. The race is primarily known from its language and list of languages shows the list of race in that demography. More the number of the speakers with their mother tongue show the dominant race of that demography. Individual race may have had one or number of kingdoms. All kingdoms in a specified demography called the age of kingdom in that era. Now present India was a place of numbers of kingdoms with different numbers of kings in the past. They were different to each other according to their linguistic race and individual beliefs or art of living and faiths. It is very hard to trace, which is the actual oldest linguistic race though some historian claims few from them oldest and streamed from one specified origin without any perfect logical base. In India, major language speakers mean major ancient Kingdoms. According to the 2001 census these are the major language linguistic race.

Table: Ordered by number of native speakers
Rank Language 2001 census
(total population 1,028,610,328 )
1991 census
(total population 838,583,988)
Encarta 2007 estimate
(worldwide speakers)
Speakers Percentage Speakers Percentage Speakers
1 Hindi 422,048,642 41.1% 329,518,087 39.29% 366 M
2 Bengali 83,369,769 8.11% 69,595,738 8.30% 207 M
3 Telugu 74,002,856 7.19% 66,017,615 7.87% 69.7 M
4 Marathi 71,936,894 6.99% 62,481,681 7.45% 68.0 M
5 Tamil 60,793,814 5.91% 53,006,368 6.32% 66.0 M
6 Urdu 51,536,111 5.01% 43,406,932 5.18% 60.3 M
7 Gujarati 46,091,617 4.48% 40,673,814 4.85% 46.1 M
8 Kannada 37,924,011 3.69% 32,753,676 3.91% 35.3 M
9 Malayalam 33,066,392 3.21% 30,377,176 3.62% 35.7 M
10 Odia 33,017,446 3.21% 28,061,313 3.35% 32.3 M
11 Punjabi 29,102,477 2.83% 23,378,744 2.79% 57.1 M
12 Assamese 13,168,484 1.28% 13,079,696 1.56% 15.4 M
13 Maithili 12,179,122 1.18% 7,766,921 0.926% 24.2 M
16 Kashmiri 5,527,698 0.54%
17 Nepali 2,871,749 0.28% 2,076,645 0.248% 16.1 M
19 Sindhi 2,535,485 0.25% 2,122,848 0.253% 19.7 M
20 Konkani 2,489,015 0.24% 1,760,607 0.210%
21 Dogri 2,282,589 0.22%
25 Meitei/Manipuri 1,466,705* 0.14% 1,270,216 0.151%
26 Bodo 1,350,478 0.13% 1,221,881 0.146%

You can’t find Sanskrit as a major linguistic race in the whole history. So claim of Sanskrit is the mother of all Indian language is a just bluff and super lies ever told to Indians. Sanskrit; In the 2001 census of India, only 14,135 people reported Sanskrit as their native language. If Sanskrit was the oldest language, and was race of major linguistic race then it would have been the largest number of speakers. Less speakers show it was a minor race in Indian race and has no major role for India without only hype by some elite group those dominate Indian literature saying Sanskrit is the mother of all language. Sanskrit has not its own letters shows it’s even was not a creative race that had developed their own alphabets. Many so called scholars claims Veda is from very ancient origin and the Sanskrit language is older than major linguistic race of India. The major language we see now is Hindi. Hindi is not Sanskrit. There was no word exists Hindi still Islam came to Indian demography i.e. till 700AD. So presently known Hindi is nothing but major letter of the Indian demography once upon a time which is named as Hind when Islamic emperor came to India and named the demography Al-Hind or Hindustan and non-Muslims to Hindu. This letter well known as Devnagari if we will eliminate Brahmins hegemony modified to its name i.e. “Dev” it remains with only “Nagari.” So Nagari is the original name of Hindi. The Nagari script was in regular use by the 7th century CE and it was fully developed by about the end of first millennium. The use of Sanskrit in Nagari script in medieval India is attested by numerous pillar and cave temple inscriptions, including the 11th-century Udayagiri inscriptions in Madhya Pradesh, a brick with inscriptions found in Uttar Pradesh, dated to be from 1217 CE, which is now held at the British Museum. Sanskrit used the Nagari script to write the four Vedas which were in the form of Shruti & Smriti or passing the information only through the recitation till it in scripted in Nagari language probably after 700AD or after that time spans. Many historian claims the Nagari script has roots in the ancient Brahmi script family. Some of the earliest epigraphical evidence attesting to the developing Sanskrit Nagari script in ancient India, in a form similar to Devanagari, is from the 1st to 4th century CE inscriptions discovered in Gujarat. First of all this historian has no evidence or arguments why Ashokan edicted letters are called Bramhi? and for which reason it should be called as Bramhi i.e. the name from dominant race Brahmins or Bramha or Brahmana etc. where the name “Bramhi” itself streams to giving the name to its inscription with this nomenclature! It’s not Bramhi it’s the letter that has been used in the age of Mauryan empire which is not related to Brami or nomenclature or ancient Indian scripture with the name like this. If it had been the case, then there should be the name Bramhi or Hindi in his stone inscription. Ashoka had followed the Buddhism and many Buddhist scriptures written in Prakrit and Pali language so it’s no doubt Ashokan pillar inscripted letters are nothing but Prakrit & Pali origin or may be with other name which we don’t know; but with a racial hegemony nomenclature by Brahmins named it as “Bramhi.” If it was Bramhi & Brahmans had their own letters, then why Vedas had not written in this language and waited till 700AD till Nagari Developed and they used the language naming it as Devnagari to write Vedas in Nagari? Ashokan edicts are older than Nagari or Sanskrit which shows Sanskrit is not a major or popular language even after Buddhism declination in India. The Edicts of Ashoka are a collection of 33 inscriptions on the Pillars of Ashoka as well as boulders and cave walls made by the Emperor Ashoka of the Mauryan Empire during his reign from 269 BCE to 232 BCE. These inscriptions were dispersed throughout the areas of modern-day Bangladesh, India, Nepal, Afghanistan and Pakistan and represent the first tangible evidence of Buddhism. Buddhism was the major religion of India than Brahmanism till 185BC when it dishonestly captured by Brahmin Pushyamitra Shuga and propagated the Vedism or Bramhanism to Ashokan Buddhist kingdom. In the age of kingdom; different kings of different linguistic races were fighting to each other for their demography expansions. The largest unified kingdom ever had created in the Indian demography was by itself Ashoka which was Mauryan Empire in 250BC and its national religion was Buddhism. Class or caste based system streams only from Sanskrit linguistic race, it’s because fourfold caste system streams from Vedas and Vedas are composed of Sanskrit. It means those are having Non-Sanskrit as their mother tongue they had no relation with the caste system till its forcefully implemented by the race of Sanskrit linguistic race to others. Pushyamitra Shunga was from Vedic Sanskrit linguistic race so he had only implemented the Vedism or Manusmriti to Non-Sanskrit linguistic races which were the part of Ashokan kingdom and created the chaos in Indian race declining Buddhism and divested the real cultures of linguistic races. If Sanskrit spoken people are few in these days then definitely they were very few in the age of  Mauryan Empire. If they were very few then how they created the 6 crore Brahmins of these days? For this answer we have to check the linguistic race of the Brahmins of different reason of India. We get different kind of linguistic race Brahmins in India whose mother tongue is not Sanskrit. Mother tongue is not Sanskrit proofs they are not belongs to Vedic Sanskrit race. If they were form Vedic origin, then they would have Sanskrit as their mother tongue. So it proofs they have just adopted the position of Brahmins favored by Vedic Brahmins to expand their faith system and to impose their philosophy Purusha shukta 10:90 merging Idolism in them to decline Buddhism. Pushyamitra Shunga had massacred to Buddhist monks of India to abolish Buddhism by shine of sword, as “Islamic emperors did after 700AD for the implementation of Islam to root natives” to implement caste based social system in different linguistic race or to Ashoka occupied linguistic kingdoms. We get many categories of Brahmins because Vedic promoters had given privileges to Idol worshipers of different linguistic race to promote their Vedism which created the empire of Brahmins with Vedic philosophy and this is the reason why different linguistic race Idol worshipers or different priest group of different native faith system became Brahmins initially with the certification of Vedic caste system. It’s the reason why their surnames don’t match with each other changing with the linguistic races. If a Brahmin in west Bengal has the surname Tagore, Mukherjee, Ganguli, Chattopadhyay, Mukhopadhyay, Banerjee etc., then we get other surnames of South Indian linguistic race with same Brahmin profession with surnames with different nomenclatures like Ayyar, Aiyar, Krishnamurti, Venkayya, Gurukkal, Iyengar etc. Different surnames with same profession from different linguistic race implies they are not from the same origin but from regional origin of a linguistic race with same profession. Which again implicates their origin is not from a single race but diversify race with one protocol i.e. Vedic fourfold caste system as social elite group named Brahmins which is defined in Rig. Veda’s Purusha Shukta 10:90. Which again implicates it’s an adoption to profession defined by Vedic caste system for racial social hegemony. It’s the reason why they created organized so called elite group according to Vedic fourfold caste system and dominated the others as racial hegemony. If they had relation to Vedic Sanskrit linguistic civilization, then they would have Sanskrit as their mother tongue and regional language as second language. Non-Sanskrit as their mother tongue and Sanskrit as official language to God shows, Sanskrit was only the adopted language by these linguistic pagan priests Vedic certified name as “Brahmins” to officiate Vedic worship method for Vedic hegemony. Hindu god and goddess belongs to Sanskrit race and they only understand Sanskrit chants is only a stupidity of the race. Krishna belongs to Yadu clan or Yadav race so Bihari may be his mother tongue, Rama belongs to Uttar Pradesh so Nagari or Hindi may be his mother tongue etc. so there is no reason exists these identities had any connections with Sanskrit civilization and Sanskrit language. It is even saying worthless Vedic peoples merged with different linguistic races of India and lost their mother tongue as their second language is totally baseless. Brahmins of different linguistic race just learned the Sanskrit to officiate Vedic worship methods for promotion of Vedism or Castesm or Brahmanism; as we learn English in present days as our second or third language to upgrading our international knowledge. Due to different kind of reservation for three upper castes by Vedic caste system in Sanskrit linguistic race, even many social con uplifted to different upper castes with their different surnames with the loopholes of implementations in different linguistic race, later which is used to recognize their social identity according to their hereditary occupations nomenclature by surnames. Many linguistic races’ divine or popular identities became the part of the Vedic or Brahmanism or Sanatan Dharma’s Hindu deities. Brahmins majorly theft their identity fabricating as Avatars of Vedic deities. Popular identity Shiva became Avatar of Rudra mentioned in Rig. Veda. Major popular linguistic identity became Avatar of Vedic god Vishnu. Pagan deities like Krishna who is originally from Yadav race of Bihar became prominent identity of Sanatan Dharma due to his popularity. Popular identity of Uttar Pradesh Rama became even a prominent identity for Brahmanism. In other sense these organized Brahmanism group created a mixed paganism named as Sanatan Dharma controlled by Vedism; later it became major religion declining the major religion of India Buddhism. Brahmanism has been demolished may Indian root faiths spreading Brahmanism and had been the major religion when Islamic Emperors Invaded India. There was no unified name as “India” or “Hindustan” to this gigantic demography of many kingdoms after Ashokan unified empire. When Islam came to this demography after 700AD they converted initially root natives to Muslims by shine of sword or by terror. To depart Muslims from other faiths of this gigantic demography they used the word Hindu. Majorly Iranians and Afghans were designating or recognizing the dwellers of riverside Shindu river as Hindu without any affiliation to specific faith. It’s the reason why they named their reined empire as Al-Hind or Hindustan. Later major religion Brahmanism adopted the Hindu word for their majority to hegemony of their empire of faith. Even with the time major knave or con people of different linguistic race uplifted them as Brahmin and propagated Brahmanism. Bullies of different linguistic race uplifted themselves as Kshatriyas and communal traders portrayed themselves as Vaishya and rest all kind of professions from different linguistic race suppressed as Shudra & Atishudra. Vesdism spread easily because most of the social con form different linguistic race attracted to Bramhin caste and portrayed themselves as Brahmins, bullies are certified by Brahmins as Kshatriyas and even some self certified as Kshatriyas, prestige hunger traders certified them as Vedic Vaishya or Brahmins even certified them as Vedic Vaishya in the age of Brahmanism for economical gains, rest innocent and ignorant became only slave to these three upper castes as Shudras to be used by these three upper castes. Brahmins just certified bullies of different linguistic race to use them as their force to control slave caste or Shudra caste & Vaishya caste. But these three castes i.e. Kshatriya, Vaishya & Shudra forgot that, adopting the caste system they are letting Brahmans as their boss and making themselves puppets to them.  Occupations are let reserved with hereditary acceptance through vedic caste system once implemented to the linguistic race. Change of occupation and surname became banned. Inter caste relation became banned and different kind of laws are made according to favor of Brahmins to these castes according to their profit orders. It means con Vedic promoters used the cons of different linguistic race to propagate their theory to rule the land dividing the people of different linguistic race in four divisions according to their profession where con as elite to all and rest are puppet to them. Sanskrit language has no similarity with Iranian language of any kind I.e. Sanskrit language has no link of any kind with Iranian languages like Persian 53%, Azerbaijani and other Turkic dialects 18% (e.g Qashqai, Turkmen), Kurdish 10%, Gilaki and Mazandarani 7%, Luri 6%, Arabic 2%, Balochi 2%, and other languages (Tati, Talysh, Armenian, Georgian, Neo-Aramaic, Circassian, Hebrew) which discards Aryan invasion theory as some historians claim. Sanskrit language race is an Indian linguistic race from thousands of linguistic race of India and always tried to dominate other kingdoms by hook and crook. Loan of few similar kind of words does not meant Sanskrit has the root to Avestan or old Persian. So Vedic race is a race of Aryans or race from Iran is totally controversial and may by a mind born story. If it is; then it does not matter because many races had been merged to Indian race and with the time they became the part of root natives to this gigantic plane. According to a psychological analysis; Brahmanism is a race of organized sociopaths i.e. a race of majorly crooks or majorly con or knave peoples of different linguistic race of India who worked organized as Theo-political group to dominate other major root natives according to their wish or favor. Masterminds of Vedsim used the cons of different linguistic race to dominate the whole land privileging them a specific elite position in a social group. The Vedic think tanks used the same method as our politician used to make politics these days. Like a National party created in one part of India spread through the all parts of the Nation where we can found their political leaders, members and voters throughout the Nation; where political party is governed by its own party protocols. For example, congress or BJP party leaders & members can be from any linguistic race of India which creates their follower voters across the Nation. Like this Pushyamitra Shunga enforced the Manusmriti & Vedic caste system to Ashokan kingdoms enforcing to the kings of different linguistic race those were part of Ashokan kingdom. Later it’s so called spiritual leaders continued the same and destroyed the Buddhism from the Ashokan empire or Indian race. Itself the word “Brahmana” has its hidden meaning. Though Brahmana so called writers hype themselves as they are great, but never seen the in-depth meaning of “Brahmana.” Many so-called scholars say “ब्रम्हम् जानती यः, सः ब्राह्मणम्” i.e. “Bramham jaanati jaha, saha Bramhanam” means those who knows about soul is known as “Brahmins” but in truth the real definition is “ब्रम्हम् हनती यः, सः ब्राह्मणम्” i.e “Bramham hanati jaha, saha Bramhanam” means those who kills or sacrifices soul is known as “Brahmana.” Purusha Shukta 10:90. Itself the example where cosmic Purusha sacrificed and all caste born. Purusha Shukta says “In the sacrifice of Purusha, the Vedic chants were first created. The horses and cows were born, the Brahmins were made from Purusha’s mouth, the Kshatriyas from his arms, the Vaishyas from his thighs, and the Shudras from his feet. The Moon was born from his spirit, the Sun from his eyes, the heavens from his skull. Indra and Agni emerged from his mouth.” Majorly sacrificial ceremony officiates by Brahmins not by other three castes. Purusha Shukta is favored to Brahmins showing the creator of Purusha Shukta either itself Brahmins or had created for the Brahmins in the motive they will dominate the whole social group. The hidden meaning is Brahmins destroy the integrity of a social group to dominate the society or in other words “divide and rule.” Why Sanskrit written protocols for Sanskrit civilization is mandatory for other linguistic race? What is the relation or connection between Sanskrit linguistic race with other non-Sanskrit linguistic race? Why should we mandatory to obey caste system which is originated by crook Vedic think tanks? Pushyamitra Shunga and his follower kings had converted their kingdoms to Vedic caste based kingdoms. Massacre of Buddhist monks had terrified to many kingdoms and Buddhist followers of ancient India. Many Buddhist monks those had converted to Brahmanism could not uplift them to the height of cons and it’s the reason why poor Brahmins whose root origin is Buddhism are still poor and following the path Buddhism’s vegetarianism & path of non-violence only having a social so called social elite status by Vedic classification. Pushyamitra Shunga was that dishonest anti national servant of a king who betrayed the faith of a king and destroyed its master’s assets and harmed to his citizens according to his communal belief. When Ashokans descendants were busy spreading the Buddhism across the world giving the governance in the guardianship of Pushyamitra Shunga making a king to a 12 or 13 yrs. kid Brihadratha as their descent as the King of Ashokan empire; this army chief dishonest Brahmin stabbed the knife in the back on their faith. He assassinated Brihadratha in a military parade when showing the strength of the Ashokan army and proclaimed himself the king of Ashokan empire and implemented the Brahmanism to Ashoka kingdom which was a unified mega kingdom of kingdoms by Mauryans. Here point to be noted Pushyamitra Shunga is a belief killer and dishonest crook and a criminal servant and for this reason Brahmins are never trusted. He never found the Ashokan empire with war; he got the Ashokan empire by an evil opportunity. The so called Brahmin scholars, writers & historians are trying to wipe these facts from the history and using fabrication to hide their dishonesty to Indian race till to date in various forms. These writers & so called historian should be targeted due to miscarriage of information and fabricating Indian history & literatures. Ashoka had suppressed the Brahmins in his regime and suppressed their profession of killing animals in Vedic ceremony as sacrifice where cows & horses were sacrificed as Gomedha & Aswamedha Yangya and was taken as their holy food. Ashoka had adopted the Buddhism and was against the violence & animal sacrifices, so he was punishing the Brahmins for such practices and enforced them to be the vegetarians. Many Brahmins became vegetarian and it became a puritanical practice to their evolution. Those Buddhist monks converted to caste based Brahmins they even continue such practices for which they became vegetarian but could not uplifted themselves to the height of con Brahmins so most of them till to date poor even having lot of favor & privileged by Vedic Brahmins. Here point to be noted if Brahmanism or Vedism was a great religion in the age of Ashoka then why he had not impressed and influenced by Vedism? Why he had not promoted the Vedism in his regime? Declining Vedism in the period of Maurayan empire shows it was a bad in the eyes of Mauryans or in the eyes of king Ashoka.  After decline of Buddhism in Ashokan empire only very few numbers of Vedic Brahmin used the idol worshipers or Poojari of different linguistic race giving them an opportunity of lucrative social position as elite defined in Purusha Shukta 10:90 and privileged manythings to them by Manusmriti to implement their theory in all land of the India for racial hegemony for which till to date they are dominating the whole India by hook and crook creating thousands of social evils due to their evil implementation Vedism. If we eliminate Sanskrit chanting, Havan or Yangya, sacrifices of animals in a Hindu worshiping method rest methods are original method of Indian idolism worshiping. Poojari & Brahmins are not same. A Brahmin is a Poojari but all Poojari are not Brahmins. Brahmin is a Vedic designation or certification to con Poojari of different linguistic race those are used as political tool to spread Vedism in Indian race. Poojaris are idol worshipers without Vedic affiliation or without Vedic caste based protocols where Brahmins are Poojari with Vedic affiliations. Vedic Brahmins gave the Non Sanskrit Linguistic-Brahmins (Idol Poojari of different linguistic race) an elite position in the society but used their mind as slave prostitutes for their philosophy. Till to date even they worship penis of the Shiva in the temple and fake son of Shiva as Ganesh believing eternal source of religion showing their logical blindness; where it’s a hypocrisy to dominate the popularity of Shiva as its idol form or to suppress popularity of Shiva as an Idol by Vedic crooks. Shiva was a famous Identity in north India and was belongs to Himalayan Nepal origin from the tribal group named Kirats. They adopted the identity of Shiva but used according to their hypocrisy targeting to fools. It means giving even elite position they fooled itself the non-Sanskrit linguistic Brahmins whose mother tongue is not Sanskrit. They fooled in many forms to linguistic Brahmins using as a tool for their philosophy dominance. Below picture will make you good understandings.

Before 250BC

There was no unified national name as India or something like this before 250BC. The present India was only a place of different linguistic race with own kind of social governance, faiths, customs, cultures, traditions and heritages. Different kinds of philosophy have been developed in their linguistic races. Many major faiths like Ajivika, Charavaka, Buddhism, Nyaya, Vaisheshika, Samkhya, Yoga, Mīmāmsā, Alekha, Jainism, Vedism or Brahmanism, non-believers, idolers, shamanism, paganism etc. etc. were eye catching faith systems in those days. There was always war between the kingdoms to expand their demography so amalgamation of their art of living was even in the evolution. There was even always war of contradictions, among in their faiths or art of living systems; where major faith always trying to contradict & dominate others.

major_indo_languagesmajor-languagesouth_asian_language_families

Before 185BC

maurya_empire maurya_empire_c-250_bce

 After 185BC

shunga-empiresocial-structure-of-hindusim pushyamitrashungavedic-panditpoojakasurnames
After 700AD

sanatana-dharmajagannath-purusha-equalityislam

Brahmins had been dominated many Indian faiths like Ajivika, Charavaka, Buddhism, Nyaya, Vaisheshika, Samkhya, Yoga, Mīmāmsā, Alekha, Jainism etc. Promoting only Vedant. They had fueled their fabricated faith Jainism against Buddhism and took the control over Nyaya, Vaisheshika, Samkhya, Yoga, Mīmāmsā in their favor. Brahmanism had been the major faith named as Sanatan Dharma in 700AD. They had been spoiled Buddhism creating division in them majorly Hinayana & Mahayana. Hinayana is the original Buddhist contexts and had followed by king Ashoka. Later Buddhism gone to many other different sects like Zen Buddhism, Tibetan Buddhism, Pure Land Buddhism, and Tantric Buddhism etc. In the age of Brahmins hegemony many natives had been converted to Vedic castes as Brahmans, Kshatriya, Vaishyas and Shudras according to their professions during the implementation of Purusha Shukta or Bramhanism. Brahmins had captured the idol paganism & tribalism of different linguistic race making it as Sanatan Dharma or Brahmanism. When Islam came initially they converted many root natives those had various faith system to Islam by shine of sword, many lower caste even converted themselves to Islam due to upper caste exploitation to lower castes. To differentiate non-Islam from Islam they designated the land as Al-Hind later Hindustan and to non-Muslims as Hindu. Major faith in that time Brahmanism or Sanatan Dharma branded themselves as Hindu. Islam remained a prominent dominant to India partly and majorly, 700AD to till British came in 1600AD around 900yrs. In 1947 Nehru & Indian constitution named all faiths those are not belongs to foreign origin under the one umbrella of Hindu & Hinduism though they are contradictory to each other.

 After 1600AD

british-indiaAfter 1947AD

india-got-dividedThe population of India has been divided in to two major religions named Hindu & Muslim in 19th century. Political power divided the India according to their adopted faith for their personal & organized benefits and nation divided in to two parts Pakistan as Muslim Nation and India as democratic Nation. India became democratic with embedding of Hindu National name as “Bharat” by Hindu orthodox active political leaders under the influence of Hindū Mahāsabhā and its descent organizations like Bharatiya Jana Sangh and Rashtriya Swayamsevak Sangh (RSS) etc. They added this new name “Bharat” to Indian constitution in a motive to make it a Hindu Nation or Bramhanic dominated  Nation in future; where the word “Maurya” or “Ashoka” should have been the perfect name against “Bahart.” There is no authenticated origin exists with this name “Bharat.”  There is no proof exist the identity named “Bharat” once ruled the whole demography of present India or British India.  Bahart from Ramayana i.e. younger brother of Rama has only ruled Ayodhya which is only a place of 10.24 km²Bharata from Bhārata dynasty i.e. an ancestor of the Pandavas and the Kauravas in the Sanskrit epic Mahabharata had only ruled specific region as Ayodhya without even any proper authenticity. Mahabharata itself seem to be only a story rather than a real life event. Its a story of cousin brothers fight for property that started from gambling. How its a source of knowledge and morals its out of logic. If even its true then there is no connection with whole linguistic race found in the Indian demography. Itself Ramayana & Mahabharata are translated to the other linguistic race proofs its not the part of the major linguistic races of India. So naming the “Bharat” to a unified Nation from communal background without any proper authenticity shows the dominance of race to Indian constitution and hegemony of these so called elite group to the Nation. India meant to present India, Pakistan, Bangladesh which was combining the kingdom of Ashoka and was primarily a Buddhist kingdom in the past. Hindu orthodox & Pakistani orthodox love to name India as “Bharat” it’s because Hindu orthodox mainly want to name it as “Bharat” because they want to make it a Hindu nation. Pakistan orthodox Muslim wants to name it as “Bharat” because they want to depart Pakistan as individual Nation where in name “India” Pakistan & Bangladesh are part of the Indian Nation. In government of India Act & Indian independence Act. you can’t find any name “Bharat.” Which implicates India can be reunited if we will have a common good effort to reunite the original kingdom of Ashoka as Indian Nation without a domination of any religion.

Present 2017

politicsindia

THESE HISTORICAL MAPS CAN HELP YOU TO UNDERSTAND WHAT WAS THE REAL SITUATION
     NB: Never believe instantly Bramhanic literature & history those are written by them or written in the direction or influence of Brahmins; most of them are honey coated sweet lies & fabrications. They are masters in literature & history corruptions. Most of their thinktanks are well in verbal & literature skills; it does not mean they got the license to spread lies, irrationality, blindbeliefs, discriminations, fabrications and diffrent kind of social evils in the name of god, religion, spiritualism, culture, cutom, tradition and heritage. But after keen observations and analysis, when you find that anything agrees with reasons and truths after your proper interpretations then accept it.

Following list is a collection of some Brahmins surnames from different linguistic race. If they were from one race as Brahmins, then they would have one surname and one mother tongue. Having thousands of surnames with different language as their mother tongue proves Brahmanism is nothing but adoption of Vedic certification of “Brahmin” by local or pagan idol worshipers of different linguistic race as organized priest hood for Vedism. Initially may be few so called original Vedic Brahmins those had programmed the Purusha Shukta were less in numbers, but their race has been merged in the idol worshiper certified Brahmins and has been lost their real identity in the amalgamation. Brahmins itself having their subdivisions according to their categories of duties. Surnames are different according to their categories of duties. Same surnames in different linguistic race shows migration of Brahmins from one linguistic race to other linguistic race, and adoption of the surnames due to same professions. Many kings even tried to establish Brahmin governance in their kingdoms so kings were giving land to them in their kingdoms to manage their villages with Vedic caste based systems. Kings were even adopting the Vedism themselves by adopting the position of ruler as Kshatriyas due to popularization of caste based social system by Vedic promoters and to decline themselves to be called as Kings of Shudras; because non Vedic caste based kingdoms were considered as Kingdoms of Atishudras by Vedic scholars. These stupid Kings could not understand adopting the position of Kshatriyas they are making masters to Brahmins. This organized priest hood as Brahmins by Vedic philosophy is the root cause of all evils in India. Though we found thousands of surnames but their population is less than 6 crores. These Brahmins actually living in a psychological disorder for decades. They are living in delusion & deception with egoism of social elite for Vedic certification as Brahmins is a disorder. Where in truth their root profession is worshiping the artistic impressions, clay, metal or stone with an identity shape naming it as deity for decades as delusions and self-deception. They are in truth living in blind beliefs, irrationality, discrimination, paranoia, partial schizophrenia, self-grandiose with different kind of partial psychological disorders for decades and promoting the same to exploit other innocent social natives, claiming the Vedic God worshiper certification adoption as Brahmin caste by Purusha Shukta 10:90. In truth Purusha Shukta 10:90 is not a knowledge it’s either stupidity or hypocrisy. They are still believing clay or metal or stone made shapes or printed artistic impressions are ruling the world; and they are the care takers of those eternal shapes named Hindu deities. If they know its fake and false and used to do all these for their livelihood cheating others to rule their followers mind and to create power of unity to use them, then it’s also a psychological disorder known as sociopathy. All Brahmins are not so fools so most of them knows, their world is a world of deception for their livelihood and racial hegemony it’s the reason why the race of the Brahmins is a race of crooks. The list of surnames proofs thy are organized theopolitical mass of different linguistic race having no single origin those working for Vedic caste based philosophy for racial hegemony of cons. Since Vedic caste system is inhuman and antisocial the promoter of this philosophy is nothing but inhuman & antisocial, therefore they are not the marks of social elite but the marks of the social stigma, stupidity, delusion, deceptions, human right abusers, cheaters, liars, human discriminators, antisocial and so called higher organized Vedic certified priest group as Brahmins and a race of just crooks. Some citizens with surnames of Brahmins are rational, anti-Vedic and anti-castes, those fight against these social evils for social reformations; they are excluded from the condemnation. True reformist not only discard the caste system & Vedic certification as Brahmins but also discard its surname nomenclature.

SURNAMES AND DIVERSIFY LANGUAGE OF BRAHMINS SHOWS THEY ARE NOT FROM SINGLE RACE

Asamemse Brahmins Surnames:

Baruah, Bez Baruah, Bujar Barua, Chandra Barua, Ram Barua, Prasad, Barua, Gobinda Barua, Acharya / Acharjee, Bhattacharya / Bhattacharjee, Bhagavati, Bardalai, Gain, Goswami, Sharma, Siddhanta, Thakur, Pathak, Sarma, Barooah, Chakravarty, Barua, Baruah, Barooah, Baroova, Borooah, Bezborah, Acharya / Acharjee, Bhatta / Bhattacharya, Bhagawati / Bhagwati, Bardoloi / Bordoloi / Bardalai, Bor / Bar – Kotoki / Katakey / Kataki / Pujari / Poojari / Puzari, Bor / Bar – Thakur / Thakore also, very rarely Borethakur/ore, Chakravarti / Chakraborti, Gain / Gayen, Goswami, Khaund / Khaound, Kotoky / Katakey, Pujari / Poojari / Puzari, Phukan / Phookan, Rajkhowa, Sarma / Sarmah / Sharma, Siddhant / Siddhanta, Savapandit, Soud, Thakur / Thakore, Pathak, Rajguru / Razguru, Tamuli (Sarma Tamuli)….

Bengali Brahmins Surnames:

Bhattacharya, Chakraborty, Mukhopadhyay / Mukherjee, Bandyopadhyay / Banerjee, Chattopadhyay / Chatterjee, Gangopadhyay / Ganguly, Ghoshal, Thakur / Tagore, Lahiri, Bhaduri, Sanyal, Maitra, Bagchi, Patitunda, Kanjilal, Roy, Choudhury, Majumdar, Joardar, Acharya, Adhikari, Aich,  Bhattacharjee,  Debnath, Ghatak, Misra, Nath, Munshi, Pathak,  Tewary, Sengupta, Dasgupta, Duttagupta, Gupta, Sensharma, Goswami, Pakrashi …

Bihar/ Mithila / Jharkhand Brahmins Surnames:

Acharya, Mishra, Ojha/ Jha, Thakur, Pathak, Upadhyay, Choudhary, Shandilya, Rajhans, Kashyap, Jajware, Sharma, Chaturvedi, Rājhans, Bhāradwaj, Shāndilya, Kashyap, Parāshar, Pratihast, Jajwāre, Achārya, Kātyāyan, Singh (Brahmins who were also Zamindars and preferred to associate themselves more with Kings than Vipra Brahmins. e.g., Maharaja Kameshwar Singh of Darbhanga Raj, Singhs/Sinha of Banaili raj, etc. But use of this surname is more an exception than a widely accepted phenomenon.), Bājpayee, Chaturvedi, Khān (a small section of Maithil Brahmins (originally from near Saharsa, i.e. from Bangaon and Parari Village of Sahara District, Bihar) who were small Kings or Zamindars by virtue of their unusual combination of strengths, intellect and acumen and were given Royal titles of Khan, KhanBahadur or KhanSahab during Akbar’s reign. In fact it was not in Akbar’s reign that Khan surname was adopted by these Brahmins. Both Bahadur and Khan are in fact Monglian words brought to India and Arab by Genghis (Changez). People (Muslims) started using the Khan surname as an acknowledgement to Genghis (Changez) Khan’s valour and similarly Lal Bahadur was derived from Ulan Batur the capital of Mongolia. So Bahadur and Khan was derived as a surname depicting the valour of Genghis (Changez) Khan. Thus few ruling Brahmins of Mithila adopted the Surname of Khan or Khan Bahadur.), Sharmā …

Nepali Brahmins Surnames:

Acharya, Lamichhane, Rijal, Bastola, Bhurtel, Bhetwal, Gajurel, Chudal, Subedi, …

Uttar Pradesh / Uttarakhand / Other North Indian Brahmins Surnames:

Mishra, Dikshit, Dubey, Dwivedi, Tiwari, Trivedi, Chaubey, Chaturvedi, Pandey, Vajpayee, Bajpai, Pathak, Upadhyay, Ojha, Goswami, Parashara, Tiwari, Nirmal, Pandit, Bharadwaj,    Shukla, Agnihotri, Siritiya, Tote, Pujari, Purohit, Nayapaul, …

Kashmiri Pandit Brahmins Surnames:

Kaul, Bhat, Raina, Haksar, Tikoo, Mattoo, Dhar, Kak, Sapru, Sopori, Razdan, Kher, Bachloo, Bakshi, Draboo, Hangloo, Wanchoo, Adalti, Adib, Adkaloo, Agha, Aima, Akhoon, Alaroo, Ambardar, Amin, Aram, Arzbaigi, Atal, Achkan, Atri, Babu, Bachloo, Badam, Badgami, Badhwan, Badyari, Bagh, Bakaya, Bakshi, Bali, Baliya, Balu, Bambroo, Bamtsunt, Bamzai, Band, Bandar, Bangi, Bangroo, Barbooj, Bataphalu, Battiv, Bazari, Bazaz, Beera, Bhan, Bhandari, Bharadwaj, Bhat, Bhujoo, Bindroo, Bishta, Bradi, Bradoo, Braru, Breth, Bula, Buni / Boni, Badshah, Bachroo, Bagati, Bambri, Banihali, Betab, Bindra, Budki, Burza, Butki, Bahaar, Bahadur, Chacha, Chaghat, Chaka, Chakbast, Chakru, Chaku, Challu, Chandra, Chandru, Channa, Charibacha, Chata, Chhatabali, Cheru, Chillum, Chiraagi, Chokan, Choku, Choor, Chotai, Chottu, Choungu, Chrangu, Chroungu, Chowdhary, Daftary, Dandar, Dangar, Dangi, Darabi, Daraz, Darbari, Dass, Dassi, Dattatreya, Dembi, Deva, Dewani, Dhar/ Dar, Dharmarthi, Dhobi / Daub, Dont, Dout, Drabi, Draboo, Dral, Duda, Dullu, Durrani, Duru, Dusaj, Danzi, Diwan,  Fehrist, Fotedar, Gadoo, Gadar, Gadroo, Gadva, Gagroo, Galikrapa, Galvan, Gamkhar, Gandnoo, Ganhar, Ganju/ Ganjoo, Garyali, Gadyali, Geru /Giru, Gharoo, Ghasi, Gigoo, Goja, Gosain, Gurkha / Gorkha, Gurtoo, Guru, Guzarwan, Galdar, Ganz, Gogayi, Haash, Haashiya, Hak, Hakachar, Hakeem, Hakhoo / Hukhoo / Hukku, Haksar, Halli, Handoo, Hangal, Hangloo, Hanjura, Hapa, Harkar, Hashiwali, Hastiwal, Hastu, Hazari, Hoon, Harkauli, Indrabi, Ishbari, Jad, Jailkhani, Jalali, Jalla, Jan, Jatoo, Jawansher, Jinsi, Jogi, Jota, Jyotsi, Jadwali, Jatta, Kabadi, Kabu, Kabuli, Kachawa, Kachroo, Kadalbujoo, Kak, Kakroo, Kakapuri, Kalla, Kallawat, Kallu, Kalpush, Kandroo, Kantroo, Kanoongo, Karawani, Karihaloo, Karnel, Karvayoo, Kasab, Kashkari, Kasid, Kath, Kathju, Katwa, Kaul / Koul, Kaula, Kaw, Kemdal, Kemmu, Keni, Kenoo, Khachoo, Khaibri, Khanakatu, Khanmushu, Khar / Kher, Khardoori, Kharoo, Khashoo, Khaumush, Khazanchi, Khoda, Khoru, Khosa, Khudbali, Khushu, Khuyihama, Kichloo, Kichru, Kilam, Kissu, Kitroo, Kochak, Kokhu, Kotha, Kothdar, Kotru, Kotwal, Kraipak, Krakroo, Krandoo, Kranzu, Kral, Krid, Kuchru, Kukil, Kukroo, Kuli, Kunzru, Kuraz, Kurdi, Kyani, Kitloo, Kachar, Kashyap, Khushpanj, Labroo, Ladakhi, Lala, Lahori, Langar, Langoo/ Lange, Lanker, Lattu, Lidhoo, Likhari, Machama, Madan, Mahaldar, Malla, Mam, Mandal, Manduloo, Malik, Manslal, Mantapuri, Mantu, Manwati, Marchawangan, Mattoo, Mattas, Mazari, Mekhzin, Meva, Mich, Mirakhur, Mirza, Miskeen, Misri, Miya , Mogal, Mohnuri, Monga, Mota, Moti, Moza, Muhtasib, Mujoo, Mukhi, Mukka, Mukku, Mukru, Munshi, Musa, Mushraan, Muthu, Makru, Modgil, Masaldan, Mubayi, Naar, Naaz, Nagari, Nakashi, Nakhasi, Nala, Naqib, Nasti, Nazir, Nazuk, Nehru, Neka, Nadir, Nad, Nagoo, Oonth, Ogra, Padar, Padi, Padora, Pahalwan, Pajnu, Pampori, Pandit, Pandita, Panzu, Parikala, Parimoo, Partazi, Pat, Patar, Patto, Patwari, Peer, Peshin, Piala, Poot, Prothi, Punjabi, Puran, Purbi, Qazi, Qandhari ( Kandhar/ Khandhar/ Kandhari/ Khandhari), Rafiz, Raghu, Raina, Rambal, Rangateng, Rangroo, Rayou /Reu, Razdan, Ratiz, Rawal, Renzoo, Revoo, Rishi, Rugoo, Sadana, Sadhu, Safaya, Sahib /Sahibi, Said, Salman, Saproo, Saraf, Sas, Sathoo, Sav, Sazwal, Seru/ Shiroo, Shaal, Shagali, Shah, Shakdhar, Shali, Sharabi, Sharga, Sharma, Shastri, Shayar, Sher, Shingari, Shishoo, Shivpuri, Shoga, Shongu, Shora, Shungloo, Sikh, Sibbu, Sidha, Sipahi, Sopori, Sukhiya, Sultan, Sulu, Sum, Sumbli, Suni, Suri, Suthoo, Sabni, Safapuri, Shahbadi, Sogami, Tailang, Tabardar, Tak, Talib, Talif, Tamini, Taimiri, Tanganoo, Tankha, Tanku, Taploo, Tar, Tariwali, Tava, Teli, Teng, Thakur, Thaltsur, Thaploo, Thathoo, Thela, Thogan, Thas, Thussu, Tiku, Tilwan, Topa, Toshkhani, Tota, Trakroo, Trisal, Tritsha, Tshut, Tsul, Tufchi, Tuli, Tulsi, Tur, Turi, Turki, Tutu,  Ugra, Uthu, Upadhyay, Vaishnavi, Vakil, Vangar, Vani, Vantu, Vass, Vesh, Veshan, Vichari, Vishnu, Vokhu, Voonth, Wadhawan, Waguzari, Wakhloo, Wali, Wanchoo, Wangoo, Wangnoo, Wanikhan, Warikoo, Wat, Watal, Waza, Wazir, Wufa, Wuthu, Wasuri, Yacha, Zaboo, Zadoo, Zahaldar, Zaharbad, Zahi, Zalpuri, Zamindar, Zarabi, Zaraboo, Zari, Zaroo, Zijoo, Zithu , Zoroo, Zotan, Zradchob, Zutshi, Zibbu, ……

Odisha Brahmins Surnames:

Samanta, Mishra, Acharya, Satapati, Pati, Upadhyay, Tiwari, Dash, Panda, Bishi, Vedi, Divedi, Trivedi, Chaturvedi, Dash Sharma, Dikshit(Dixit), Debata or Devata, Nath, Sahu, Panigrahi, Rath, Rath Sharma, Sarongi, Joshi, Pattojoshi, Purohit, Pujari, Devasharma, Padhi, Khuntia, Nanda, BhattaMishra, Tripathi,   Dwivedi, Udgata orudgātṛ, Hota or Hotṛ, Satapathy, Kar, Bishi, Suara, Mahasuara, Garabadu, Sharma, Nath, Choudhury, Sahu, Dyansamantray, Panigrahi, Guru, Rajguru, Rayguru, Mahapatra, Pani, Mohapatra (some of them),  Patra, Sadangi, Pani, Thakur (found mostly in Kalahandi and Sambalpur), Pati, Bahinipati, Sarangi, Gantayat, Behera (found mostly in Kalahandi and Sambalpur), Sar (Found mostly in Hindol, Dhenkanal), Sabat, Swain (some of them), Shukla, Pandaor Pandit, BadaPanda, PujaPanda, Sabata, Nanda, Padhiary, Pathi, Nepak, Devasharma, Otta, Khadenga, Pradhan (some of them) Senapati, Dhar, Guru, Rajguru, Rayguru, Patri, Bahinipati, Thakur, Chaini(found mostly in Kalahandi and Sambalpur), Palo (Pala or Pal in Orissa not Bengal), Nayak, Barpanda, Muni, Praharaj, Pani, Paathi, Gantayat, Suara, Mahasuara, Garabadu, Choudhury, Sahu, Dyansamantray, Nepak, Khadanga, Devasharma, Udgata, Hota, Otta, Bebarta, Chaulia, Bastia, Mallia, Garabadu, Samantray, Boxi, Boxi-patra, Bakshi, Udgata, Singhababu, Singhamahapatra or Sinhamahapatra, Mahanty, Pathak, Dandapath Satapathi, Sannigrahi Hota, Goswami Praharaj, Pyne, Tewary, Nayek, Layek …..

Gujrati Brahmins Surnames:

Bhatta, Upadhyay, Vyasa…

Maharashtrian Brahmins Surnames:

Kulkarni, Deshpande, Fadnavis, Phadnis or Phadnavis, Desai, Patil, Joshi, Bhatta, Shastri, Rao, Sharma, Hedge, Garge, Varne, Shrirame, Padhye…

Karnataka Brahmins Surnames:

Rao, Aithal, Bhat, Adiga Deshpande, Somayaji, Sharma, Shastri, Hebbar, Iyer, Iyengar, Karanth, Bendre,
Subramanian, Sharma, Swami, Swaminathan (well this is more tamil nadu), Srinivasan, Venkatraman,
Krishnamoorthi…..

Tamil Brahmins Surnames:

Iyer / Aiyar, Iyengar, Swaminathan ….

Punjab Brahmins Surnames:

Jaitly, Trikha, Kumoria, Jinghan, Mohla, Joshis, Kurals, Bhanots, Sands, Pathaks, Bharadwajs, Shouries, Bali, Vaid, Chhibber, Datt, Mohan, Lau and Bhimwal, Issar, Markandey (or Markande), Kumaria, Jhingan, Shorey, Punj, Rampal, Modgil, Kapil, Kaushal, Kanav, Lakhanpal, Tejpal, Sehajpal, Bhardwaj, Attri, Devgan, Bhaskar, Mannan, Biala, Agnihotri, Dwivedi, Davesar, Prabhakar……

Telugu Brahmins Surnames:

Sharma, Deekshitulu, Joshyula/ Josyula, Mishrula, Dwibhashyula, Bhagvatula, Shashtrula, Shastry/ Sastri/ Sastry, Upadhyayula, Suarashtrula, Bhattula, Saraswatula, Goda, Bhamidi ,Chelluri,  Appajosyula, Vishnubhotla Kandalam, Kandala Nadiuminti, Devarakonda, Nadiminti, Korada, Upadrastha, Cheedella,  Mukkavilli, Bikkavilli, Vepa, Instala, Sistla, Sista, Vedula, Rambatla, Rangabatla, Mushinuri, Maddoori, Vadali, Perepa, Sonthi, Dhavala, Bhagavatula, Sreerangam,  Gollapalli, Gollapudi, Gullapalli, Challa, Subraveti, Regulagedda, Padullaparti, Bulusu, Kothakota, Vempati, Kompalli, Kundurti, Pasumarti, Dandurti, Chembolu, Pisipati, Paturi, Veluvalapalli, Gudimetla,  Pamulaparti, Jayanti, Mukkamala, Mulugu, Munukutla, Burra, Veleti, Voleti, Vogeti, Gandikota, Chanchalam, Inguva, Potanapudi, Kota, Bommerla, Janaswamy, Bhairavabhatla, Akella,  Adibhatla, Ayyalasomayajula,  Peri, Ayyavari, Dhavala, Aryasomayajula, Viswanadha, Vadlamani, Vedula, Aati, Bontha, Oruganti, Penamakuri, Mannava, Kummamuru, Kalanadhabhatla, Potharaju, Mopidevi, Kasinadhuni, Veluri, Vangala, Vishnu Vajjhula, Koorella, Avadhanula, Somayajula, Murthy, Vangala, Veluri, Vishnuvajjhula, Pannala, Koorella, Avadhanula, Somayajula, Bhairavabhotla, Somina, Mulukutla, Jupudi, Bhaskaram, Varanasi, Mudiganti , Poduri, Karri, Veluturupalli, Nagampalli, Yerramilli , Prayaga, Pakala, Modukuri, Burra, Sitamraju, Chatrathi, Susarla, Taranikanti, Vinjamuri, Avasarala, Gadepalli, Chakravadhanula, Peddada, Tata, Anupindi, Chennubhotla, Kanchibhotla, Nori, Sista, Bellamkonda, Gumma, Vadrevu, Visapragada, Nidasanametla, Avasarala, Avantsa, Parasa, Musunuri, Velidimalla, Vemula, Vutukuru, Takkellapati, Yamujala, Viriyala , Annasamudram , Kalluri , Vedanabhatla, Nidasanametla, Avasarala, Avantsa, Parasa, Musunuri, Velidimalla, Vemula, Vutukuru, Takkellapati, Yamujala, Viriyala , Annasamudram , Kalluri , Vedanabhatla, Turlapati, GundaPantula, Wupadrastha/ Wupradrishta / Upadrastha, Nudurupati, Ravi/Raavi(Vaidiki Velanadu), Vadapalli (Vaidiki Telaganya), Anumula (Vaidiki Telaganya), Chitrapu (Niyogi), Gorugantula (Vaidiki Velanadu), Prabhala, Chebrolu, Devulapalli, Jonnabhotla/Jonnabotla/Jonnabhatla (Vaidiki Telaganya), Sanganabhotla/Sanganabhatla, Neralla, Pulle, Akkinapali, Indraganti, Kappagantula, Kunapuli, Upadhyayala, Kodukula, Vellupuri, Nemani, Aaradhyula, Potlacheruvu, Pratha, Inugurthi, Govada, Dhurjathi, Amencherla, Atmakuru, Indrakanti,Indragani, Mangalampalli, Mylavarapu, Kaasibhatla, Kaasbhatta, Vinjamuri, Dantu, Dhanturthi, Pendyala, Kolachana, Kasivarjula, Vishnuvarjula, Pydimarri, Veluri, Indrakanti, Indraganti, Appala, Cheemalakonda, Vinjamuri, Mylavarapu, Kaasivarjala, Vishnuvarjala, Kolachana, Mangalampalli, Veluri, Dhanthurthi, Dhantu, Pydamirri, Vundavilli, Sanagavarapu, Upaadhyayala, Mahavratayajula, Saripalli, Oruganti, Ganti, Gantimahapatruni, Kasi, Kodukula, Ayyagari, Maruvada, Onteddu, Pappu, Darsi, Rebbapragada, Tallapragada, Manapragada, Tamirisa, Kastoori, Bodapati, Chintalapati, Chintalapudi, Erranki, Karanam, Pamulaparthi, Karri, Kodukula, Ganti, Nemani, Appalla, Sambara, Anipindi, Upadhyayula, Aadiraju, Mantha, Chitella, Kandala, Ammu, Achalla, Saripalli, Karra, Sista, Sistla, Iruku, Rajyam, Rambhatla, Vruddhula, Surabhi, Chelluri, Tummuluri, Nerella, Manepalli, Apiketla, Gannavarapu, Vanamali, Golluru, Vaddi, Nishtala, Yeraguntla, Rudrabhatla, Yadivilli, Pappu, Ganti, Emani, Nidadovulu, Marella, Rachakonda, Burela, Raavi, Poodipedi, Malladi, Bachu, Potapragada, Mullapudi, Durbha, Dharmavaram, Jayanti, Mullakela, Parinam, Sripada, Meduri, Jonnalagadda, Suravajjala, Nidamarthi, Vanam, Gollamudi, Kalangala, Yanamantram, Velpuri, Kompella, Yerramalli, Nidumolu, Palakurthi, Jalamangala, Hejeebu, Philkhana, Panuganti, Nistla, Viswanatha, Aari, Inguliga, Kotapalli, Narahari, Koti, Vidhyaparapu, Kopalli, Mangalagiri, Kapila, Kakulavarapu, Kadapa, Kasturi, Gummididala, Delhi, Vyamajala, Chirukuri, Kondapi, Gundugurthi, Annapragada, Thangirala, Naarambhatla, Lolla, Velamuri, Pullabhotla, Aadibhotla, Vishnubhotl, Thangirala, Lolla, Rangavajjula, Kappagentula, Jayanthi, Prabhala, Sripaada, Jandhyala, Velamuri, Somayajula, Palivela, Satyavolu, Gollapudi, Madiraju, Maranraju, Pingili, Adiraju, Shivaraju, Jamalapuram, Kavturi, Poolla, Somanchi, Galebhe, Angara, Casukhela, Jillella, Kharidehal, Iduri,
Annavarapu, Damerla, Nanduri, Nori, Dronamraju, Adiraju, Basavaraju, Josyula, Rani, Vayuvegula, Kanchinadham , Ganti, Oruganti, Karra, Kodukula, Karri, Chitta Vajjula, Kolluru, Srirangam , Pudipedhi ,Appala, Aradhyula, Nemani, Yellai, Kasi Somayajula, Ayyagari, Mantha, Sembari, Garlapati, Kakkunuri, Gundlapalli, Lakkaraju, Gollakota, Thammera, Gandhasiri, Kanchibhatta, Gannavarapu, Ganti, Gumma, Anivella, Rachakonda, Chivukula, Modali, Chilukuri, Kota, Emani, Nimishakavi, Parakala, Tadinada, Mantripragada, Kondaveeti, Ilapakurthy, Tamma/ Thamma, lingamgunta, Kanduri, Hari, Anipeddi, Mukkapati, Tangirala, Tamirsi, Madduri, Godavari, Samudrala, Kondepudi, Yaddanapudi, Varanasi, Dwivedula, Malladi, Mandavilli, Samudrala, Mahankali, Manchiraju, Akkiraju, Kosaraju, Dronamraju, Sathiraju, Mukkamala, Somanchi, Malladi, Cherukuri, Ghanta, Gadiyaram, Darbha, Srirangam, Paramkusam, Mankala, Manda, Modekurthi, Saripilli, Gumuluri, Pulugurthi, Kuchimanchi, Volimiri, Dusi, Geddam, Pulugurtha, Parimi, Rapaka, Chintalapati, Chilukuri, Addepalli, Ghatti, Tadigadapa, Velamuri, Kocherlakota, Kota, Akella, Achanta, Kambhampati, Vemuri, Mylavarapu, Balijepalli, Lanka, Tanikella, Pammi, Dubagunta, Tanguturi, Revuri, Prekke, Parimi, Viswanatha, Kota, Burra, Kousika, Vedantam, Penumarthi, Chennavajjula, Jampani, Rallapalli, Chivukula, Varahabhatĺa, Maruwada, Saripalli, Ayyalasomayajula, Aryasomayajula, Rambhatla, Kaasibhatla, Peddibhotla, Nittala, Kalinadabhatla, Arka,  Yechuri, Peddibhotla, Gade, Chikka, Simhambhatla, Gudimetla, Kolachina, Gollapudi, Polapragada, Neti, Manda, Kavuri, Bhamidipati, Pamidipati, oruganti, Toleti, Bulusu, Yaddanapudi, Gunturu, vedantham, Velamuri, Kuchibhotla, kuchibhatla, Sistla, Yanamandra, Ragampudi, Chinthalapati, Aripirala, Nyayapati, Nandanavanam, Suravarjula, Chittavarjula, Sanivarapu, Rudravarapu, Budhavarapu, Akkaraju, Lakkaraju, Akkiraju, Jarugumalli, Topalle, Kuchibotla, Emani, Mudhigonda, Tumuluri, Darbha, Pasumarti, Madhipatla, Chengalva, Voore, Chintalapati, Vajjah, Velamakanni, Bammidipati, Kovvuri, Jonnalagadda, Divakaruni, Vavilala, Pidugu, Nuti, Maganti, Nandula, Baru, Nadella, Josyabhatla, Ravinutha, Josyula, Chandrabhatla…….

Brahmin Surnames Andhra Maharashtra, Goa Deshastha:

Atmasidha, Abkari, Acharya, Altekar, Ainapure, Airani, Agavekar , Adgoankar, Agnihotri, Anaspure, Adawadkar, Alekar, Ambike, Amin, Ane, Anagare, Annachhatre, Aparajit, Aphale, Apsingekar, Argade, Aranke, Arcot, Arjunwadkar, Aserkar, Ashtekar, Ashtikar, Atale, Atre, Aurangabadkar, Avachat, Ayachit, Babre, Badve, Badave, Bag, Bajikar , Bakore, Ballal, Bangali-Deshpande, Bansod, Banavadikar, Barabote, Barde, Barve, Bavare, Bavikar, Beke, Belapure, Belhe, Belsare, Benare, Betawadkar, Bhadang, Bhadange, Bildikar, Bhagwatwar, Bhalerao, Bhoraskar, Borkar, Bhargav, Bhargave, Berde, Bhawalkar, Bhise, Bhome, Bhonde, Bhopale, Bhosekar, Bidkar, Bidwai, Bhatta, Bobde, Bobade, Bodhni, Bokil, Borate, Borawar, Borgaonkar, Brahme, Buddhiwant, Burange, Burkule, Cavale, Chaporkar, Chande, Chandratre or Chandratrey or Chandratreya, Chandurkar, Chaskar, Chati, Chapalgaonkar, Chaudhari, Chanduri, Chausalkar, Chaware, Chikhalikar, Chitgopekar, Chinchore, Chindhade, Chitrav, Chitnis, Chivate, Chouthai,  Chouthai, Chumbhale, Dabade, Dabadge, Dabir, Dabhikar, Dadegaonkar, Dagaonkar, Dahale, Dahigaonkar, Dharangaonkar, Dalal, Dandwate, Dande, Dandge, Dange, Dahanukar, Dahasahasra, Dani, Dane, Danke, Darbhe, Darvekar, Dashputre, Dashputre-Suratkar, Dastane, Davalbhakta, Dawalbhakta, Dayal, Degalurakar, Dehadrai, Dengale, Deo, Deodhar, Deochake, Deolalikar, Deorukhkar/Devrukhkar (erstwhile Tiĺak), Deosthali, Deshmukh, Deshpande, Deshpande-Papalkar, Deshpande, Devdare, Dhanwantari, Dhavse, Dharane, Dharmadhikari, Dharwadkar, Dhavalikar, Dhawlikar, Dhaygude, Dhekne, Dhepe, Dhobley, Dhodapkar, Dhole, Dhotre, Dhongde, Dhondse, Dhulekar, Digde, Dingre, Diwakar (Sabnis), Diwanji, Dixit (दीक्षित), Dole, Dorwat, Dubey, Dudhmande, Dushe, Edki, Ekbote, Ekhande, Erande, Gaat, Gabale, Gadakari, Gade – Earstwhile Dev, Gade, Gadikar, Galgale, Galgali, Gandhe, Ganorkar, Gangathade, Gaopande, Garkhedkar, Garud, Garware, Gavai, Gaydhani, Ghatpande, Ghayal, Gawfale, Ghan, Ghirnikar, Ghirnikar, Gholap, Ghodke, Ghotkar, Ghugari, Ghungarde, Ghushe, Girgaonkar, Giridhar, Godse, Gohad, Gore, Gorhe, Gorwadkar, Gosavi, Goswami, Gowardhan, Gramjoshi, Gumaste, Gudi, Gunthe, Hamine, Hasabnis, Hatekar-Joshi, Hatvalne, Hedgewar, Hinge, Hingane, Hirwe, Hoshing, Hulsurkar, Ingale, Indurkar, Itkikar, Itraj, Jatkar, Jere, Jamkhedkar, Janpandit, Janorkar, Jape, Javalgekar, Javle, Jeurkar, Jinasiwale, Jirankalgikar, Joshi, Jugade, Junnarkar, Jugoolkar, Kalamkar, Kalamb, Kadegaonkar, Kale, Kalvit (Kalwit), Kalwint, Kalele, Kakade, Kamble, Kamtikar (erstwhile Mandke), Kanade, Kanago, Kand, Kandharkar, Kandlikar, Kanhegaonkar, Kanthe, Kapre, Kapde, Karalgikar, Karanjikar, Karhade, Karpate, Karmalkar, Karyakarte, Kasarekar, Kashikar, Kasture, Kaujalgikar, Kavle, Kavathekar, Kavimandan, Kavishwar, Kaviskar, Kenge, Kerhalkar, Keskar, Khajandar, Khaladkar, Khankhoje, Khair, Khot, Khati, Khapre, Khedkar, Khedkar, Khiste, Kemkar, Khinikar, Khire, Khodade, Khole, Khond, Kholkute, Khoche, Khisti, Kinhikar, Kinhekar, Kittur, Kolarkar, Koleshwar, Kolhekar, Kolwadkar, Koranne, Koralkar, Kotasthane, Kothalkar, Kshemakalyani, Ksheersagar, Ksheersagar, Ksheersagar, Kuber, Kudrimoti, Kulkarni, Kalkar, Kumbhojkar, Kurhekar, Labhe, Lahade, Laddu, Lahankar, Lakras, Lale (लाळे), Lasane, Laturkar, Laulkar, Likhite, Lokapur, Lomate, Lotangane, Luley, Mandavgane, Madane, Mahashabde, Mahulikar, Mairal, Mallikar, Malode, Manbhekar, Mande, Mandke, Mandlik, Mandviker, Mashalkar, Mate, Matekar, Maybhate, Mayee, Medhi, Melgiri, Menjoge, Meru, Mhalagi, Mhalas, Mirajgaonkar, Mitragotri, Modgi, Moghe, Mogre, Moharikar, Moharir, Moholkar, Mokashi, Mokashi, Mone (मोने), Morankar, Moro, Motlag, Mushrif, Musalgaonkar, (Vaidya), Murhekar, Mujumdar, Mungale, Mungee, Murar, Nasery, Nargund, Nadgir, Nadgir, Nadpurohit, Nanajkar, Nanilam, Nandedkar, Nandedkar, Nanoti, Navalgund, Nazarbagwale, Nerlekar, Nimbargi, Nimbhorkar, Nirkhe, Nisal, Nivargi, Odhekar, Phadnis, Pachhade (पछाडे), Padalkar, Pade, Pagadi, Pagedar, Pagnis, Paithankar, Paithankar, Paithankar-Joshi, Palkar, Palkhe, Panat, Pande, Panchakshari, Panchpor, Panse, Pandit, Pande, Pandharkar, Pangarkar, Pangaonkar, Pant, Parasnis, Paralkar, Parakhi, Parandekar, Paravekar, Parkhe, Parkhi, Parlikar, Parnaik, Paropkari, Pasarkar, Pathak, Patodekar, Pattarkine, Pattekar, Pattalwar, Pattankar, Pedgaonkar, Peshwe, Petare, Petkar, Pimplikar, Pimple, Pimpalgaonkar[Kulkarni], Pisipati, Pohnerkar, Pol, Polke, Pophale, Potdar, Potnis, Poundarik, Prabhune, Prasade, Pratham, Prayag, Pujar, Pujari, Pund, Punde, Punith, Puntamkar, Puntambekar, Puradupadhye, Purandare, Puranik, Puranik, Purkar, Pujadhikari, Purohit/Vadhyayar/Vadhyar, Rajadnya, Rajankar, Rajurkar, Railkar, Rajpathak, Rajguru, Rajopadhyay, Rakshe, Rasal, Ratanjankar, Ratnaparkhi, Ravetkar, Rayrikar, Rawke, Rekhi, Relkar, Renapurkar, Renavikar, Rishi, Ron, Ronghe, Rotkar, Rotwadkar, Sabde, Sabnis, Sadalgekar, Sagade, Salkade, Samag, Samak, Sambre, Sambhus, Samudra, Sangwai, Sant, Sakalgaonkar, Saraph, Sarnobat, Sarpatwari, Saswadkar, Sastikar, Satalkar, Satbhai, Sevekari, Shaligram, Shamji, Shende, Shiralkar, Shirsikar, Shrivatsa, Shukla, Shukla, Shrotri, Sukalikar, Supnekar, Sutone, Tabib, Tadphale, Tadwalkar, Tagat, Tagare, Tak, Tapaswi, Tayade, Tayde, Tekale, Turki, Udgir, Umarani/Umrani/Umaranikar, Upadhye, Upadhye, Upadhye, Upasani, Utpat, Vadhyayar/Vadhyar, Songirkar, Valunjkar, Vanjape, Varhadpande, Varkhedi, Varudkar, Vatsaraj, Vedpathak, Vighne, Vidyasagar, Viladkar, Visal, Vyas, Vyavahare/Wewhare, Vyawahare/Wewhare, Wakhare, Wanjape, Yadkikar, Yadnik, Yatagiri, Zodgekar, Moharkar, Chinchwadkar……..

Explore yourself Brahmins surnames from other linguistic races and I am sure you will find more and more….

 

*****

 

Download the article in pdf

ORGANIZED PRIESTHOOD BY VEDIC PROTOCOL AS SOCIAL ELITE OR VEDIC CERTIFIED POOJARI/POOJAKA/IDOL WORSHIPER AS “BRAHMINS” DESTROYED THE WHOLE PROGRESSIVE INDIAN RACE AND STAGNATED INDIA TILL TO DATE CREATING MANY SOCIAL EVILS IN THE SOCIETY. BRAHMANISM IS THE ROOT REASON OF ALL MAJOR SOCIAL EVILS IN INDIAN RACE. THESE SURNAMES ARE NOT ELITE BUT STIGMA TO INDIAN RACE. ADOPTING INDIAN’S BUDDHISM CHINESE, JAPAN AND SOUTH KOREAN RACE BECAME RATIONAL & TECHNOLOGICALLY PROGRESSIVE BUT DESTROYING THE SAME IN ITS NATIVE PLACE STAGNATED INDIANS COMPARING TO THEIR CIVILIZATIONS. IF OUR ORIGINAL MAJOR RELIGION HAD REINED HERE THEN INDIA WOULD HAVE BEEN MORE DEVELOPED THAN JAPAN, CHINA & SOUTH KOREA. RATIONALITY IN BUDDHISM DEVELOPED THEIR NATION BUT IRRATIONALITY IN BRAHMANISM STAGNATED AND DESTROYED THE REAL INDIA.


Brahmins Exposed by a Ambedkar supporter.  The first PM of India Kashmir Brahmin Mr. Jawaharlal Nehru became the PM without any election. The First Lok Sabha was constituted on 17 April 1952 after India‘s first general election but Jawaharlal Nehru hold the office from 15 August 1947 without any democratic election process.

Drive Away Brahmins from India
They are only less than 6 Crores
And real enemies of the Nation.
Brahmins are Dangerous than even Invaders.

3%-5% Brahmins devastating the lives of 97% root natives of India. Its better to depart them as other Nation like Pakistan.

India should be the Brahminless country.

WE MUST DECLINE BRAHMANISM

 

Posted in Uncategorized | Leave a comment

Who killed Buddha identity from India? (Brahmins conspiracy to Decline Buddhism and to Buddha)

maurya_empire_c-250_bce_2Mauryan Empire which is now known as India was the largest kingdom in 250 BCE with area coverage about 5,000,000 km² in south Asia. Ashoka had polarized by Buddhism after the Kalinga war (262 – c. 261 BCE) after that he proclaimed himself as Buddhist and had promoted Buddhism in his kingdom and outside of his kingdom. Which implicates two major facts 1. In that time Kalinga was a place of Buddhism practice where he got polarized, 2. Asoka found Buddhism is best faith than other faiths in that time in the age of kingdoms in south Asia. Asoka had made many Biharas, Stupas and Buddhist shrines, stone inscriptions, cave inscription & pillar inscriptions to promote Buddhism various part of the neighboring kingdoms including his own kingdom. Asoka had built many of these emblems to promote Buddhism but after the destruction by Buddhist decliners; we got today only few pillars remaining that has inscriptions; most of them are found in India. The inscriptions on the pillars described edicts about morality based on Buddhist tenets. Legend has it that Ashoka built 84,000 Stupas commemorating the events and relics of Buddha’s life. The only one pillar which is located in presently named Lumbini, Nepal is of particular note thinking as it is the oldest inscription found in Nepal and it also commemorate Ashoka’s visit to Buddha’s birthplace after he converted to Buddhism. If you compare Lumbini pillar with Indian Asoka pillars it looks new and dissimilar comparing to Indian Asoka pillars.

PICTURES OF NEPAL ASOKAN PILLAR

rummindei-asoka-pillarid12 lumbini1 lumbini-asoka-pillar p1190778 pchris rummindei-pillar Stone Pillar from Emperor Ashok at the Maya Devi Temple in Lumbini Nepal.PICTURES OF INDIAN ASOKAN PILLARS

asoka-pillars-from-diffrent-anglesPillars of Ashoka in Vaishali, Bihar, India

800px-heliodorus-pillar2 5066808 1433145168_vaishali ashoka_pillar_allahabad_1870 ashokas_pillar_vaishali asokan_pillarIf you read “Asoka and the decline of Mauryas” by writer Romila Thapar you can find very clear proofs that Asoka never believed in Vedism or Sanatan Dharma or in Varna system. I am having doubt Asoka had used the word Brahman & Brahmi in his inscriptions due to declining Vedism & Brahmanism in his empire though he had not intolerant to other faiths in that time; but the use of “Brahmins” & “Bramhi” in the translation to English only will be replaced by “Buddhist monks” & “Prakrit or the unidentified language claimed as Bramhi.” Now let’s come to Lumbini of Nepal. This place was not Lumbini till the pillar found there, and it was previously known or named as Rummindei according to Alois Anton Führer; which is situated in the foothills of the Siwalik range in the district of Rupandehi. The Ashokan Pillar in Lumbini stands at 6 meters and is made from pink sandstone which is not similar like Indian Asoka pillars which arises a question of doubt about its authenticity in that place. The pillars were mostly built by Asoka if he had built that pillar then why it does not resemblance with his other pillars? You can even get the pics of that pillar searching google from which you can find the pics, that the pillar is inside a pit.

p136birthplaceofbuddhaYou can get above picture from various sources as an old picture of  Alois Anton Führer‘s claimed pillar. If it had existed there before, then why there is a picture of pillar in a pit? Pillar in a pit shows enough clues that it’s a fabrication. The pillar was lost until 1896 when a team of archaeologists rediscovered it. The Ashokan pillar, discovered by Gen. Khadga S. Rana and Dr. Alois Fuhrer in 1896, presented the first epigraphic evidence relating to the life history of Lord Buddha. Alois Anton Führer (26 Nov. 1853, Limburg an der Lahn, Germany – 5 Nov. 1930 Binningen, Switzerland) was a German Indologist who worked for the Archaeological Survey of India. He is known for his archaeological excavations, which he believed proved that Gautama Buddha was born in Lumbini, Nepal. Führer’s archaeological career was bad which had ended in disgrace. Under official instructions from the Government of India, Führer was relieved of his positions, his papers seized and his offices inspected by Vincent Arthur Smith on 22 September 1898. Confronted by Smith about his archaeological publications and his report to the Government, Führer was obliged to admit “that every statement in it [the report] was absolutely false.” These activities were presaged by Führer’s publications on Sanskrit texts and law which, as shown by Andrew Huxley, are effectively works of plagiarism, large portions being copied from the writing of Georg Bühler. On 8 April 1898 Georg Bühler drowned in Lake Constance, under somewhat mysterious circumstances. Contemporary accounts mostly attributed it to an accident, but it has been speculated that it was a suicide motivated by Bühler’s connections to a scandal involving his former student Alois Anton Führer. Nepal never ruled by majorly Brahmins & Islamic empires so who destroyed the Buddhist pillar there and why it could not discover before 1896 If it had there? If Ashoka found the place as Buddhist birth place, then why he had not given so importance like other places in India? Or it’s only a fabrication by Buddhist decliner conspirators to depart Buddha from India for their racial hegemony, fabricating his birth place promoting “birth place of Buddha is outside of India” through the corrupt & criminal archeologists  Alois Anton Führer? There was no historical proof exists Ashoka had ever visited the Rummindei in 248/249BC, which is now claimed as the birthplace of the Buddha.  It’s even not clear whether Ashokan built the pillar or whether the people of Rummindei. The pillar itself a question of its authenticity.  The inscription reads: “King Piyadasi (Ashoka), beloved of devas, in the 20th year of the coronation, himself made a royal visit, Buddha Sakyamuni having been born here; a stone railing was built and a stone pillar erected to the Bhagavan having been born here, Lumbini village was taxed reduced and entitled to the eight part (only).” The text itself proofs it was not made by Asoka and a fabrication; it’s because texts saying in his 20th coronation he had visited there. Asoka ruled his kingdom “268BC –  232 BC” (ruled 36yrs). Kalinga war had took place in 262BCE – 261BCE; it means he had been a Buddhist after 261BC i.e. after his Coronation 268 BCE. Which means Asoka  lived as non-Buddhist about 6years after being a King and rest of his life as Buddhist king. Is not it a joke if he knew the birth place of Buddha, which is in Nepal at Lumbini, then why he visited there after 14 years? If the place had ever existed named Lumbini in Nepal and was part of a Maurya empire, then why it took him 14 years to reach there though he never had any demographic issues? There is no rocket science needed to proof the birth place of Buddha is not in Nepal and its in India. How-many Buddhist idols and sites are found in Nepal? What is the age of that Asoka pillar for which  Anton Führer claimed Buddha’s birth place is in Nepal and the place is Lumbini? How many Buddha idols are found till to date in Nepal? What are the ages of the Buddhist idols found in Nepal comparing to those are found in India? The fabrication is also not well orchestrated and planned so its a joke and believing in Alois Anton Führer’s claim is absolutely stupidity and meant for brainwash with an evil intention. If you deeply study our Indian race of faiths, then you can find only one race i.e. Vedism/Brahmanism had always tried to decline Buddhism in Asoka’s or Mauryans empire.  It was itself Mauryan empire’s dishonest Vedic Brahmin army chief Pushyamitra Shunga did the treason and had slain the Asoka’s descendant Brihadratha cowardly & mercilessly. He had only destroyed the national religion of Maurya empire i.e. Buddhism implementing vedism with Manusmriti by hook and crook. Even you can find from google search, Brihadratha was assassinated in 185 BCE during a military parade by the Brahmin general Pushyamitra Shunga, commander-in-chief of his guard, who then took over the throne and established the Shunga dynasty. Only due to Pushyamitra Shunga the unified largest kingdom of South Asia destroyed and after that it had separated to many small and large kingdoms by successor kings. Only due to Pushyamitra Shunga Mauryans largest empire gone through the massive destruction of its multi-cultural unified Buddhist Kingdom & lost its identity as south Asian largest empire. Brahmins are the eye catching decliner and conspirator of declining Buddhism in India in that time to till date. Buddha’s birth place in Nepal is more than 100% conspired by Brahmins; if it will be investigated properly then we can find the peoples behind  Alois Anton Führer.  Why a German Archeologist had worried about the Birth place of Buddha? Where he got the materials & instigation for fabrications? Is it Muslims or British who would benefit fabricating the birth place of Buddha? Now let’s search, which place is the real birth place of Buddha in India. If you study the criminal psychology and pathological conspirators, then you will find a common behavioral pattern in them i.e. they will fabricate to that matter more which is believed is really true. In Vedism the root Veda is Rig Veda. Crook Brahmanism is a racial organized crime in India till to date. When they implemented their Char Dham concept, then before the pilgrims got famous they had placed their Mathas first in those place to control the pilgrims. The char dham comprises Badrinath, Dwarka, Puri and Rameswaram. The Four Shankaracharya Peeth (Seats) at the Chaar Dham school of Hinduism, created in these Hindu monastic institutions. They organized the Hindu monks under four Maṭhas (Sanskrit: मठ) (monasteries), with the headquarters at Dvārakā in the West, Jagannatha Puri in the East, Sringeri Sharada Peetham in the South and Badrikashrama in the North.

The table below gives an overview of the four Amnaya Mathas founded by Adi Shankara, and their details.

Shishya
(lineage)
Direction Maṭha Mahāvākya Veda Sampradaya
Padmapāda East Govardhana Pīṭhaṃ Prajñānam brahma (Consciousness is Brahman) Rig Veda Bhogavala
Sureśvara South Sringeri Śārada Pīṭhaṃ Aham brahmāsmi (I am Brahman) Yajur Veda Bhūrivala
Hastāmalakācārya West Dvāraka Pīṭhaṃ Tattvamasi (That thou art) Sama Veda Kitavala
Toṭakācārya North Jyotirmaṭha Pīṭhaṃ Ayamātmā brahma (This Atman is Brahman) Atharva Veda Nandavala

Puri is dedicated to Rig Veda. So Puri is the root victim of first fabrication with strong proof implementation by them i.e. dedicating it to Rig. Veda. Govardhana matha(820 AD) had founded by Adi Shankara (788 CE-820 CE  (aged 32)) and had established before the temple was reconstructed by Anantavarman Chodaganga Deva i.e. in 820 AD. So it is quite sure here is the key point of destruction of Buddhism in Odisha and since its dedicated to Rig veda it’s the place where Buddhism had originated. Adi Shankara was the philosopher and theologian from India who consolidated the doctrine of Advaita Vedanta. He is credited with unifying and establishing the main currents of thought in Hinduism and as a great Vedism promoter. Shankaracharya, Ramanujacharya and Madhvacharya are considered to be the pillars of Vedantic tradition of spiritual India. Adi Shankara had more inclination to Shaivism according to his three parallel mark worn on the forehead that belongs to represent worshipping to Shiva as prime God. Anantavarman Chodaganga Deva (1077AD-1150AD) was a ruler of the Eastern Ganga dynasty during its apogee, which ruled southern part of Kalinga, India.  The Jagannath Temple at Puri was rebuilt in the 12th century atop its ruins by Anantavarman Chodaganga. The ruined temple was nothing but a Buddhist shrine. King Chodaganga was originally a Shaivite from Srimukhalingam who became a Vaishnava under the influence of Ramanuja (1017–1137 CE) when he visited Puri. Since Govardhana matha had established in 820 AD in Odisha its highly possible Shaivism had spread in Puri due to only Adi Shankara but when his next great vedic promoter Ramanuja came to Odisha then he polarized the king according to his inclination to godly identity i.e. Vaishnavism. Ramanuja was a great follower of Vishnu. You can find the Vaishnavism symbol used by Ramanuja and in Puri temple’s top are same. It’s the reason why it is dedicated to the Lord Vishnu. The Jagannath temple was built in the 12th century (1161 AD) atop its ruins by the progenitor of the Eastern Ganga dynasty, King Anantavarman Chodaganga Deva;  but Govardhana Matha was existed 1161-820=341 years before the reconstruction of the temple. What it was doing there? Adi Shankara is root cause of destroying Buddhism after the Shunga empire and was a prime promoter of Vedism that propagates Purushasukta of Rigveda (fourfold caste system) and ideology of Manusmriti. So he was the first Master Mind to destroy the real culture of Odisha and making of the fake Jagannath Culture. Adi Shankara and Ramanuja have no origin to Odian race at all though both are belongs to south India and were representing Shaivite and Vaishnava cult of Vedism imposed paganism i.e. Sanatana Dharma or Brahmanism. Vedism is not a part of Odian race as claimed by present Odian spiritual scholars and leaders due to either lack of historic ignorance or want to impose and continue Vedic hegemony declining real Odian culture Buddhism for self and organized benefits. The caste system hails from Purusha sukta (puruṣasūkta) hymn 10.90 of the Rig-Veda. Purusha is described as a primeval giant, not unlike Norse Ymir, that is sacrificed by the gods (Purushamedha) and from whose body the world and the varnas (castes) are built. He is described as having a thousand heads and a thousand feet. He emanated Viraj, the female creative principle, from which in turn the world was made. In the sacrifice of Purusha, the Vedic chants were first created. The horses and cows were born, the Brahmins were made from Purusha’s mouth, the Kshatriyas from his arms, the Vaishyas from his thighs, and the Shudras from his feet. The Moon was born from his spirit, the Sun from his eyes, the heavens from his skull. Indra and Agni emerged from his mouth. It means Brahmins in our ancient India created this definition according to their favor to dominate other social groups for racial hegemony. Their motive was to divide society symbolizing according to the important body parts of a human with social pivotal professions to administer the social groups according to their favor.

jagannath-purushaObjecting to Purusha of Veda, Jagannath Identity had created. Jagannath idols are anti Brhamins and anti Vedic like Buddha. No mouth represents, we don’t believe or declines that Brahmins are created from purusha’s mouth, no arms represents we declines or don’t believe that Kshatriyas are born from Prusha’s arms, no thighs represent we declines Vaishyas are made from prusha’s thighs and no legs of Jagannath idol represents we decline or don’t believe Shudras are made from Purusha’s feet; the remained rest of the body is our society without any discriminating class system those are having rights of equality in all respects. In other words, excluding those are made from mouth, arms, thighs and feet remaining body is our society that don’t have any class. So identity is against fourfold caste system. Puri was a Buddhist temple before it reconstructed as Jagannath temple. According to Sri Lankan legends, when the Buddha died in 543 BCE, his body was cremated in a sandalwood pyre at Kushinagar and his left canine tooth was retrieved from the funeral pyre by his disciple, Khema. Khema then gave it to King Brahmadatte for veneration. It became a royal possession in Brahmadatte’s country and was kept in the city of Dantapuri (modern PuriOdisha). It shows the linkage of Buddha to Puri. Architectural style of Puri temple is Kalinga Buddhist Architecture. The procession of cars of the gods is mentioned in one of Ashoka’s edicts, so it’s from Buddhist origin. Proof of Chariot festival is from Jagannath cult origin is absent before 1200AD so it proofs the chariot festival of Buddhist relic fabricated to Jagannath chariot festival in Puri by Vedic promoters. The eating of food by all castes & race in the same place is a custom from Buddhist origin to decline Vedic fourfold caste system which had fabricated to Mahaprasad tradition but as Hotel to specific religion i.e. to only followers of Vedism/Hinduism/Sanatana Dharma or Bramhanism. According to W.J. Wilkinson, in Puri, Buddhism was once a well-established practice but later Buddhists were persecuted and Brahmanism became the order of the religious practice in the town; the Buddha deity in now worshipped by the Hindus as Jagannatha. It is also said that some relics of Buddha were placed inside the idol of Jagannath which the Brahmins claimed were the bones of Krishna. Even during Ashoka‘s reign in 240 BC Odisha was a Buddhist center and that a tribe known as Lohabahu (barbarians from outside Odisha) converted to Buddhism and built a temple with an idol of Buddha which is now worshipped as Jagannatha. It is also said that Lohabahu deposited some Buddha relics in the precincts of the temple. Buddhist emblems destroyed by Brahminism/Vedism fabricating the Idol. The birth place of Buddha points to Odisha not to Nepal for many reasons.  Dr. Cunningham in his “Ancient Geography of India” points out the place where from the Tarai inscription had been discovered is not at all related to the name Kapilavastu or even the name Kapila. And the noted historian Dr. Smith asserts that the place of the discovery of the Tarai inscription was never called Rummindei; it was a forged name given to it by archaeologist Dr. Fuhrer. The noted historian V.A.Smith challenges this statement of Dr. Fuhrer and comments – “This gives no further evidence for Fuhrer’s assertion and it appears that neither the Nepalese officials nor the hill-men called it Rumindei.” This was forgery of the name by Fuhrer in order to convert his discovery to a conclusion and to relate it with the name Lumbini. And uptill now it has become the conclusion. But later on he (Dr. Fuhrer) admitted that there was no such name ever called Rummindei in Nepal. Besides it has been proved that Buddhism had not been adopted in Nepal till the 6th century A.D. In face of all these clear-cut statements of noted scholars, it is quite sane to focus our attention on the village Kapileswara at Bhubaneswar in Orissa. The centuries old Kapileswara village has got some similarity with the Kapilavastu in name and a region nearby called Lembai is similar to Lumbini. According to Tripitaka, Lumbini was a small estate with its capital at Kapilvastu. Till recently, as can be seen from maps of 1817 AD there was a Lembai Pragana; and Kapileswara was a part of it. Besides, the inscription of Kapileswara village corroborates the statement of Tripitaka and the Kalinga war of Asoka. The mention of the era of Buddha and the name of the scribe in the said inscription help us to take this as genuine. Out of four places hallowed in memory of Buddha, one is his birthplace Kapilavastu. When the birthplace sculptures were destroyed, it might be intentionally fabricated placing it to the other place declining birth place of Buddha in India.  In Nepal, not only the name Lumbini, but also the name Kapilavastu is rare. The statement of Dr. Cunningham in his book ‘The Ancient Geography of India’ bears testimony to this: No trace of Kapila has yet been discovered at the foot of the Himalayas. After the recognition of these areas as the birth-place of Lord Buddha, only recently (within sixty years) these names are being used in the maps and official documents. Another important fact is that a temple of Mayadevi, Buddha’s mother, is also found at so called Lumbini. But R.R.Diwakar says that this temple must have been built later, as the building of temples was not yet in vogue during the time of Asoka. Many historians are of opinion that the scripts found in the Tarai inscription have no similarity with the script of other inscriptions of Asoka’s time. If scholars take up the study of this Tarai inscription with all seriousness, it will be crystal clear that this inscription does not belong to the time of Asoka, nor does the pillar containing the inscription. Dr. Fuhrer discovered the Asokan stone inscription in the Nepal Tarai in 1896. The Kapileswara birth-plate, also evidently an Asokan stone inscription, was discovered 32 years later. A great deal of discussion on the Kapileswara plate appeared in the Indian Historical Quarterly (vol. V) in 1929, but no research was conducted on it. Research scholars both inside and outside Orissa and India did not examine the evidence with any seriousness and it was left at that, till Chakradhar Mahapatra conducted extensive research on the subject and brought out a book named “The Real Birth Place of Buddha” published in 1977. Mr. Chakradhar Mahapatra argues that an Asoka-pillar existed at the then Kapilavastu and the present Kapileswar, which recorded the birth. It was destroyed in religious disturbances in Orissa. From the Mahabamsa section of the Tripitaka published later, it came to be known that Lumbini was a vast feudal (zamindari) area, and not a village or a place. In the month of March 1928 a stone inscription like the one found in the Tarai region was found in Kapileswara, a village then one mile away from Bhubaneswar, the present capital of Orissa State. Now it has become a part of the city of Bhubaneswar, the part called the old town. The Kapileswara plate, first brought to public notice by Mr. Harenchandra Chakaldar of the Calcutta University was procured about March 1928 by Mr. Birendranath Roy for his private museum at Puri from a farmer of the village of Kapileswara, situated nearly a mile to the south of the famous Lingaraj temple at Bhubaneswar. The farmer had found the inscribed stone slab set in the mud wall of his hut. This is all the information which Mr. Roy and others could gather from him. The lingam (phallus) of the Bhaskareswara temple of Bhubaneswara was proved to be a portion of an Asokan pillar by the eminent historian Mr. Rajendralal Mitra in 1880 and then supported by Dr. N.K.Sahu and Dr. K.C.Panigrahi, two eminent historians. The Linga formed out of a piece of the original Asoka pillar was named Bhaskareswara, another name of Buddha meaning the Sun God certainly it had connection with Buddha, because of the fact that Buddha is frequently designated as ‘Arkabandhu’ and ‘Adityabandhu’ meaning of friend of Sun God. As the lingam was converted from the broken pillar containing Buddha’s mortal remains, the name Bhaskareswara was given to the lingam. Even the name Bhubaneswara is derived from one of the names of Lord Buddha. A group of people of Kalinga during the lifetime of Buddha had accepted Buddhism, because the first two Buddhists, Tapusa and Bhallika were inhabitants of Kalinga, and Buddha had come to Kalinga twice after his enlightenment. But after the death of Buddha when the emperor of Kalinga Brahmadutta made Buddhism the religion of the state, Buddhism got spread in every part of Kalinga, but unfortunately taking advantage of the death of Brahmadutta, the kings of Nanda dynasty of Magadha attacked Kalinga and occupied some parts, and partially destroyed, many Buddhist monuments. As mentioned in the book of Mr. Mohapatra, when all the sculpture of Kapilavastu, the birth place of Buddha, were destroyed, some of the most devout Buddhists led by Bhikshu SANKASA in 5th century AD thought over as to how to keep the memory of Buddha intact. The seal scribed with “OM DEVAPUTRA BIHAR KAPILAVASTU BHIKSHU SANKASA” alleged to have been recovered from that place relates to 5th century. Because the BHIKSHUS kept it concealed in such an inaccessible place after the original birthplace was damaged. That could never have been the palace of Sudhodana surrounded by the paddy fields. Retaining the text in a copy, they had handed over the original plate to the faithful Mallas and went away to Nepal. The said original plate contained 90 letters. So following the principle of truth they also kept 90 letters in this latter version of the birth plate. But they dropped the name of the scribe and the date, because they would have been far from the truth, the cardinal principle of Buddhism. In course of time it so happened that Buddhism became completely extinct in the real birthplace of Buddha. Likewise, the followers also could not take the image of Konakamana. They took an exact copy of the inscription installed in the Konakamana stupa, and placed it building a pillar in the Himalayan Tarai area. As the image and pillar of Konakamana were situated in the seashore, likewise they constructed the pillar on the bank of a great tank. The present Konark was the site of the Konakamana stupa and the Ashokan inscription. After a long interval they also shifted the image of Mayadevi and placed it in that secret far off place in Tarai region of Nepal. Then after some time they perhaps took away the remnant of bones and sacred ashes of Buddha from the ruined stupa at Kapileswara and after constructing a new stupa put those bones and ashes there. Being desperate of failure in preserving intact the main citadel of Buddhism in the real birthplace of Buddha, an artificial seat of Buddhism was constructed in the Tarai region in the foot of the Himalayas. The sculpture of it was quite different from the Asokan period. But unfortunately this place has wrongly become famous as the birthplace of Buddha. But at last the original birthplace has come to light. If the pillar, which was built by Asoka, after 240 years of Buddha’s death in Buddha’s original birthplace, would have been present now along with the plate, then, there would have been no such arguments as raised now. But due to ill luck, Buddhism was rooted out from Orissa. After Asoka made Buddhism the state religion in the empire many fictitious stories were fabricated about Buddhism. Many legendary tales completely distorted the true history. One of the tales says that there were many ‘Buddhas.’ Out of the six ‘Buddhas’ the fifth Buddha was named ‘Konakamana’, who was also known as ‘Konakamuni’. But these six ‘Buddhas’ were no other than the same Gautama Buddha. The two edicts of Asoka i.e. (i) The Kapileswara inscription referring to the birth of Buddha and (ii) the Konakamana inscription prove undoubtedly that Buddha was a historical person. In the end we must give serious attention to the fact that Lumbini never existed in Kapilavastu, rather according to the old Buddhist literature Kapilavastu, was the capital of Lumbini. But the stone-pillar, which Asok got erected in the birthplace of Buddha, the name of Kapilavastu never occurs. Because Sakyamuni was born in Lumbini (Asoka refers to Buddha as Sakyamuni), Asoka gave up the idea of realizing land revenue from the residents of Lumbini and he offered his worship at the place where Buddha was born. During the time of Goutam Buddha, Bramhadutta was the Emperor of Kalinga. Buddha was the son of a small estate owner a Jamidar as can be seen from the book “Bhagaban Buddha” by Dharmananda Kosambi. Suddhodana, his father, was the proprietor of a small estate in the vast kingdom of emperor of Kalinga. After the death of Buddha his left molar tooth was given to the then Emperor of Kalinga and not to any other King. It is written in the Mahapadan Sutta of Mahavaga that Lumbini was an Estate of Buddha’s father. His capital was Kapilavastu. Ashok constructed the pillar in Kapilvastu where Buddha’s birth rites were performed. Had Kapilavastu been a city of some standing, Ashok would have named it in the inscription on the stupa. Compared to the vast Indian Empire of Ashoka, Lumbini was a very small estate and Kapilavastu of those days was its headquarters without much of urban characteristics to be called a town (nagara). But the forest area where Buddha was actually born became famous later as Bhubaneswar which is actually one of the other names of Buddha. Till 1940s the present new capital of Orissa was actually a dense ‘sal’ forest. After renouncing the world Buddha went out aimlessly and reached Rajagriha, the capital of Magadha. In ‘Suttanipata’ Buddha himself has said that Toshala was a part of Lumbini region. When Bimbisara, the Emperor of Magadha, saw Buddha, he was astonished looking at the most handsome ascetic and asked his whereabouts. In Niravana Katha Jataka edited by Bhadanta Ananda Kausalyana it is mentioned that it took 60 days for Buddha to travel from Rajagriha to Kapilavastu to cover a distance of 60 yojanas i.e. about 675 kms. at the daily average rate of 1 yojana which is 11 kms. Kapileswara (Kapilvastu of Orissa) is at a distance of 650 kms. from Rajagriha straight while the so called Kapilvastu region of Tarai area is only a distance of only 300 kms. from Rajagriha. The same Hemavantagiri as mentioned by Buddha later on was known as Swarnakuta. Swarna and Hema both stand for gold. This hilly region also included the forest area of Chandaka which was named after Chhandaka, the Charioteer of Buddha. Khandagiri, Dhauligiri and Udyagiri hills belonged to this area. They were all in the Capital of Toshala and Kapilvastu was situated in the foot of the Hamavanta. The Dhauli rock edict of Ashoka was specifically addressed to the people and Administrators of Toshali, and not Kalinga an empire, which contained the state of Toshali and the region of Lumbini.

Buddha Replied,

“Ujum janapado raja hemavantassa passato”

“Dhana viriyana sampanno tosalesu niketino”

Translated it reads –

“there is O’ king, a country on the slop of the Hemagiri, rich in wealth and heroes, who dwell among the Tosalas i.e. straight from here the rich the prosperous Tosali which lies in the foot of Hemavanta, is my residence.” These holy words of Buddha are quoted in Pabbajja Sutta in Suttanipata published by Palli Publication Board. Thus according to Buddha Himself he belonged to Toshala. Kapilavastu of Toshala, (later known as Toshali) which is presently Kapileswara of Bhubaneswar is situated to the south of Rajagriha and both of them stand almost on the same meridian. Rajgiri is on 85° 30’E and Bhubaneswara is on 85° 45’E but Kapilavastu of Nepal and Rajagriha, capital of Magadha by no means located in a straight line. If straight location is taken from the stand point of latitude, Rajagriha is situated on latitude 25° North while Kapilavastu of Tarai region is located on the latitude 27°30’N. In the whole World as has been described earlier, two persons who for first time accepted Buddhism were the two merchants of Kalinga, Tapussa and Vallicka as can be seen from Lalitavistara – 24th canto. The two merchants came traveling from Kalinga referred to in Lalitavistara as Utkal and they had approached Buddha and offered him rice and honey cake. They had offered him “Arisha pitha” described as ‘madhupindakam’ in Rajayatana Katha. This was lump of sweet food made of rice powder, gur(jagerry), ghee and other ingredients, still a popular delicacy in Orissa today. After enlightenment, Buddha had accepted food first of all from these two merchant brothers of Utkal (Kalinga) and they embraced the new religious thoughts by Buddha. In one sense they could be called the first two converts. Buddha then went in their cart to the Mrugadava forest of Varanasi now called Saranatha and while these merchants were on the way back from Hastina, Buddha came with them to Rajagriha. All these descriptions indicate that Buddha and these two brother merchants belonged to one region i.e. Kalinga now (Orissa) as has been mentioned by Sir Edwin Arnold in his book ‘The Light of Asia’. Buddha had given his teachings in Pali language. It is known that the then language of Kalinga was Pali. The stone inscription of Kharavela as can be seen in Udayagiri hill near Bhubaneswar is written in Pali. The news spread that the Tathagata was going to have His Parinirvana (demise) in the estates of the Mallas on the full moon day of month of Vaisakha which also happened to be Mesha Sankranti, the first day of the solar month of Aries. The bereaved Mallas who belonged to the Vasistha clan came to Him with their families and worshipped Him. They cremated Him after his ‘Maha Parinirvana’ (great demise) with the respect of a ‘Rajachakravarti’ as given in Maha Parinirvana Sutam. Mallas denied to give his ashes and bones to anybody and they came to His birth place, Kapilvastu. The Mallas had entered Kalinga with Buddha’s ashes and bone. Emperor Brahmadutta had received them and worshipped the tooth of Buddha keeping it inside a golden casket and renamed his capital as “Dantapura”. He also built a stupa with the statue of Buddha, also known as “Konakamana” in that city of Charitra port, then in the middle of Kalinga as that was the route by which Buddha had travelled with his wife and children. A stupa was built in His birthplace by Brahmadutta, Emperor of Kalinga and the ashes and bones were kept there. The Mallas migrated with their kins to Kapilvastu to worship the relics of Buddha as can be seen from the book Bhagavan Gautam Buddha by Uttama Bhikshu. The Mallas belonging to Vashistha clan are still to be seen at Kapileswara near Bhubaneswar. They are now nearly 500 families. Families have inter marriage system only among themselves. They are now known as Mallias. After the religious transformation they have become worshippers of Shiva, but all of them strongly believe that Buddha was born at Kapileswar. The first Kapileswara Lingam was previously worshipped by the sage Kapila and then by Suddhoddan father of Gautam Buddha. The second Kapileswara lingam was installed by the Mallas who were worshipping the sacred relics of their beloved Goutam Buddha, in a stupa. After the stupa and then the pillar erected by Ashoka was destroyed by the religious fanatics, the vase containing the relics of Buddha was removed and it still lies vacant, and on it a Lingam is installed which is third lingam of Kapileswara. It is like a coverlid and bears a hole and reminds the Mallias the birth place of Buddha, as mentioned by A. Barth and Dr. A.Cunningham in their book ‘Religions of India’ published by the Archeological Survey of India. The Mallias who are the main worshippers now claim that the out let was aimed at respiration of Lingam. Now only the third Lingam is worshipped. The Brahmins of Kaundanya clan who were the priests of the Sakyas are still living in Kapileswara area since last 2500 years. They were worshipping the stupa till 5 th century AD and after the stupa along with the pillar was destroyed it was replaced by a Shiva Temple. Then they have become the cooks of the Kapileswara Temple. It has been referred to in many puranas written after Gautam Buddha that Kapila Muni the propounder of Sankhya philosophy meditated for many years at Kapilavasthu and the place was known as Kapilavasthu after him. After the extinction of Buddism, Kapilavastu became a full-fledged seat of Saivism, and renamed as Kapileswara. The people of Kapileswara believe that their place was sanctified both by Kapila Muni and by the birth of Buddha. Even those Mallas (Now Mallias) who are worshipping relics of Buddha while pouring water upon the Shiva Lingam use to call aloud – “Oh Sage ! Kapila.” Emperor Ashoka had invaded Kalinga in 261 B.C. defeated them and was himself converted to Buddhism. 29 years after this he died in 232 B.C. After his death the non- Buddhists again became powerful in Kalinga and destroyed the Buddhist monuments and other memorials built by Asoka. During this period, the Kapileswara (Kapilavastu) pillar and the sacred stupa, built before, were destroyed. The distinguishing features of birth plate of Kapileswara, the proofs from the adjoining areas, the ruined fragments of the Asokan pillar, all these prove perfectly that this birth plate on the pillar had been installed by Asoka. Besides, it is doubtless that the present Konarka area as the Konakamana region. The remnants of the temple of Mayadevi in the premises of the present ruins of the Konark temple clearly establish that Konark was a Buddhist shrine. The image of Buddha recovered from this area is worshipped as Dharmaraja at Puri Jagannath temple. Mayadevi is not the name of any Hindu Goddess. The Mayadevi temple bears ample evidence of the fact that the site of Konark temple was a Buddhist shrine. This worship at the birthplace of Buddha was taken up by Asoka after twelve years of Kalinga war. After two years of his conversion to Buddhism, he had been to Uruvela, the place of enlightenment of Buddha. Then again he came back to Pataliputra and got himself busy in preparing the installing the rock edicts in different parts of India. Nearly five years passed like that. When Asok was doing all the work for the propagation of Buddhism, is it not something unusual for him not to visit Buddha’s birth place for paying his homage, when the so called birth place Kapilavastu of Nepal was so near to his capital, Pataliputra? Why was there delay on the part of Asoka to go to the birthplace of Buddha? This doubt can be removed only by the assumption that Asoka very much hesitated to enter the war ravaged Kalinga immediately after accepting Buddhism. He had to wait for a long period of 12 years to come to the birth place of Buddha, because by that time, the situation in war-ravaged Kalinga had changed for the better because of his love for peace, efficient and gist administration, and his affectionate messages to the people. Asoka never had a battle with Nepal. If Buddha was born in Nepal, after embracing Buddhism, Ashok would have visited Nepal more than once in 12 years. There may be a question that in case we accept Toshali of Kalinga as the region where Buddha was born, why did it not occur to Hiuen Tsiang to come over to the birthplace of the Lord during his sojourn here? The answer is that by the time Hiuen Tsiang came, the whole region of Kalinga was a land of Savites, and the Buddhist monuments were in utter ruins. The Sakya and the Kolas had left the country and took refuge in far off forest tracts because of the oppression of the Savite Kings. We do not find a single name place starting with Kapila in Nepal today. ‘Rummindei’ is a creation of Dr. Fuher. When the same Sakyas Kolas are still found exclusively in Orissa, and when Mallas (Malias), the true worshippers (Upasakas) of Buddha are found in great numbers in Kapileswar near Bhubaneswar, will it not be ridiculous to put the birth place of Buddha in the Tarai region of Nepal? Would the historians answer this question?

Refer these links:

http://magazines.odisha.gov.in/Journal/jounalvol1/pdf/orhj-3.pdf

http://odisha.gov.in/e-magazine/Journal/jounalvol1/pdf/orhj-3.pdf

https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Alois_Anton_F%C3%BChrer

https://en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=Alois_Anton_F%C3%BChrer&offset=&limit=500&action=history

To check similarities with Pali with Odia use this website:

http://dictionary.tamilcube.com/pali-dictionary.aspx

Check usual body parts like eye, ear, leg etc. or 1,2,3, numbers, animals like Dog.. food like rice or fruit like mango or verb like “more” etc. etc… the exact word of Odia with same pronunciation will be found.

 

buddha-margaBUDDHA IS THAT INDIAN WHICH HAS BEEN SPIRITUALLY LIKED, LOVED AND WORSHIPPED BY MANY PEOPLES AROUND THE WORLD. BUDDHISM NEVER FOLLOWED CON OR HOOK & CROOK GAME LIKE VEDISM TO MAKE ITS FOLLOWERS BIGGER OR HAD FOLLOWED THE SHINE OF SWORD TO ESTABLISH ITS EMPIRE OF FAITH LIKE ISLAM. JESUS NEVER FOLLOWED CHRISTIANITY BUT WAS A BUDDHIST MONK. PEOPLE OF JAPAN, CHINA, SOUTH KOREA, CAMBODIA, THAILAND, MYANMAR, BHUTAN, MONGOLIA, SRI LANKA, LAOS,  SINGAPORE, TAIWAN, MACAU, MALAYSIA, NEPAL ETC. RESPECT BUDDHA MORE THAN ITSELF HIS BIRTH PLACE INDIA.  ITS SHOWS THE HEGEMONY OF BRAHMINS AFTER EVEN INDEPENDENCE OF INDIA. TILL TO DATE OUR GOVERNMENT IS NOT GIVING HIM THE RECOGNITION OF AN INDIAN. OUR GOVERNMENT NEVER TOOK ANY STEP, WHY BUDDHISM HAD DECLINED IN INDIA AND WHO WERE RESPONSIBLE FOR THAT IN OUR HISTORY BOOKS. NOT EXPOSING THE REASONS BEHIND DECLINATION OF BUDDHISM AND IDENTITY KILLING OF BUDDHA FROM INDIA BY WHICH RACE SHOWS STILL INDIA IS IN BRAHMINS HEGEMONY.

ONLY ONE INDIAN IS FAMOUS & TRULY LOVED AROUND THE WORLD TILL TO DATE FROM 263BC, THAT IS BUDDHA.

BUDDHISM IN ODISHA

This slideshow requires JavaScript.

BUDDHISM OF ODISHA CONVERTED TO NON-BUDDHISM

This slideshow requires JavaScript.

Posted in Uncategorized | Leave a comment

One Nation but Three Names?

India is one Nation but with three major names i.e. India, Bharat & Hindustan lives in India. It means with the names people of India divided with its names. The name “India” is given by the foreigners majorly by European to inhabitants of the united multi linguistic demography kingdoms with Coordinates 20.5937° N, 78.9629° E i.e. from the Kashmir to Kanyakumari and from the Sindh region now in Pakistan to Kumki in the Changlang district, Arunachal Pradesh.

largest-kingdomindia-not-bharatindia-not-bharat-namebharat-namebharat-name-federal

THESE HISTORICAL MAPS CAN HELP YOU TO UNDERSTAND WHAT WAS THE REAL SITUATION

    

The name is only due to the river Indus or Shindu or Shindus or Hindus or Indus or Hindu i.e. India is derived from Shindu->Indus->Indu->India where Hindu is derived from Shindu->Hindu->Hindustan where stān or sthan is a Persian word  indicative of a country or region; in both the case Hindu or Indu or Indus or India had no affiliation to any religion it just represents riverside dwellers of Shindu river. This river was known to the ancient Iranians in Avestan as Hindu, in Sanskrit as Sindhu, to Assyrians (as early as the 7th century BC) as Sinda, to the Persians as Ab-e-sind, to the Greeks as Indos, to the Romans as Indus, to the Pashtuns as Abasind, to the Arabs as Al-Sind, to the Chinese as Sintow, and to the Javanese as Santri.  In Pali, Síndhu means “river, stream” and refers to the Indus River in particular. The word “Indus” is the romanised form of the ancient Greek word “Indós” (Ἰνδός), borrowed from the old Persian word “Hinduš” which is in turn borrowed from the word “Sindhu.” Megasthenes’s book Indica derives its name from the river’s Greek name, “Indós” (Ἰνδός), and describes Nearchus’s contemporaneous account of how Alexander the Great crossed the river. The ancient Greeks referred to the Indians (people of present-day northwest India and Pakistan) as “Indói” (Ἰνδοί), literally meaning “the people of the Indus”. The country of India and the Pakistani province of Sindh owe their names to the river. The total length of the river is 3,180 km (1,980 mi) which makes it one of longest rivers in Asia. Originating in the western part of Tibet in the vicinity of Mount Kailash and Lake Manasarovar, the river runs a course through Ladakh, Gilgit-Baltistan, and Khyber Pakhtunkhwa, and then flows along the entire length of Punjab to merge into the Arabian Sea near the port city of Karachi in Sindh. It is the longest river of Pakistan. Here it must be noted as the bitter truth the identity of Hindus is presently in Pakistan not in India; its because the word from which Hindu originated that river majorly runs in Pakistan. So Hindu word is originated from the foreign origin majorly by Persians or Iranians. It’s clear both the word India and Hindu is not given itself by their natives it’s all given by foreigners according to the demography. Indian region even partly or wholly had several names at different era in history, like Aryavartha, Jumbudvepa, Tianzhu, Hodu, India major and minor, Bharatavarsta, Hindush, Hind, Al Hind, Yin, Indoi, Ind, Hindustan etc. Most of these names has one common origin i.e. river Sindu aka Indu or Indus. Even Alexander the great had a hard time with it. During his conquest in 327–326 BC, at the bank of river Indus he stated Indus to be bigger than any other river in Europe. So North Asians, Middle East and Europeans always made river Indus as the territorial benchmark for warfare as well as trading. They called the land east of Indus i.e. South East Asia as East Indies. East indies was always a place of attraction since ages. It was once economically the most successful province in the world. Columbus once in 1492AD August tried to discover an easy trading sea route to east indies (SE Asia) by traveling westerly from Europe. But this ended up in discovering “West indies” and America continent. There is also a theory that American aboriginals being called American Indians or red Indians, Indiana state origin etc. are all related to Columbus’ belief of having landed on India. East India Company: Like any startup/growing company would do, EIC selected a then well rated term “East indies.” They found it apt since they were planning to deal with the land east of Indus. They modified the term ‘Indies’ to the old-medieval age English term for Indus river-‘India.’ As the East India company entered a region with huge scope of growth potential they started to control the province. During their reign the name India got more popularized and was again included to the modern English. For classifying their colonies and for office purposes, British Raj chose the name ‘India’ from east India company and officially named this multi provincial land collectively as India and the indigenous people as Indians. In every Acts they passed till 1947 they mentioned the name of land is India not Bharat or Hindustan. Bharat is created after 1947AD only by Hindu orthodox leaders without its authenticity for racial hegemony. You can verify RSS and Hindu Mahasabha leaders never use the word India in their speech which directly proofs they are only the people those don’t agree with the constitution of India i.e. “We the people of India” and decline our federalism which is directly proofs these are the only the prominent anti nationalist elements in the name of Nationalism. These anti nationalist elements teach and certify others nationality according to their communism and fascism.    Islam reveled by Prophet Muhammad (born 570AD) in 610 AD and came to India in 700AD. For various reasons many root natives had converted in to Muslims; major reasons were forceful conversion by orthodox Muslim emperors and lower caste Hindus conversion to Islam for upper caste persecution, Buddhists and other faiths conversion to Islam due to only Vedic or Brahmanism exploitations. When Islamic rulers tried to depart Islamic believers from non-Islamic they used the word Hindu to non-Muslims later Brahmins used to represent their faith Sanatan Dharma. Hindu had used to represent slave to Islam so I don’t find it should be our national Name. Hindu word even not there in any Veda and Puranas that had composed till 1300AD. Now let’s come to Bharat. The word is coined by only Hindu MahaSabha & RSS like mentality Vedic supporters or by only orthodox Brahmans political leaders in that time when our constitution had made. According to them Bharat was a king that had ruled whole Pakistan+India+Bangladesh. So its coined by only Vedic promoters claiming younger brother of Rama i.e. Bharat was the emperor of British Indian demography once upon a time, but according epics he was a king of only Ajodhya/Ayodhya which is a city i.e. a tiny part of present India at the south end in the Indian state of Uttar Pradesh. Ayodhya used to be the capital of the ancient Kosala Kingdom. Present Ramayana is an edited version of Hindu promoters majorly by Brahmins. Hindu is the name which had  given by Persian & Afghan Islamic emperors when they invaded India in 7th century. Rama was a king of a small kingdom presently 10.24 km² with very specific region named Ayodhya that was not the whole India (3.287 million km²) we have now as our democratic country. Other theory is; it is named as Bharat because Jain’s first Tirthankar Lord Rishabhadev’s eldest son Bharat Chakravorty had ruled to the land long and long days back where exact time and area of demography is unknown; according to Jains, Jain Dharma is an ancient religion & even older than Vedic-Hinduism. Another claim is, long days back in history, the land had ruled by a brave like lion emperor Bharat, where exact time and area of demography is unknown. He was the founder of the Bhārata dynasty and thus an ancestor of the Pandavas and the Kauravas in the Sanskrit epic, Mahabharata. Vedic supporters claim, the Bhāratas are prominent tribe in the Rigveda, the story of Bharata is first told in the Adi Parva of Mahabharata, wherein he is the son of Dushyanta and Shakuntala. If you study the facts, you will conclude its all are Brahmins bluffs with rare truths. There is no evidence exists of any kind “Bharat” identity ruled the present Pakistan, India and Bangladesh in past without bluffs; maybe he partly ruled some kingdoms but that was not India. There is no evidence “Bharat” was the ruler of whole India without only bluff & gossip or rumor or a hoax. There is no authenticity of the name “Bharat.” If we consider “Maha Bharat” as “Big war” then meaning of Bharat is “War.” If we consider “Bharat” is a name of a person then what is the meaning of “Maha Bharat?” i.e. if Krishna is a name then what is the meaning of “Maha Krishna?” ; its no-doubt meaningless and stupidity. Another thing is why name of a “federal kingdoms” will have in the name of a person whose origin is uncertain, fake and baseless? India is nothing but largest empire of Mauryan empire which was a Buddhist empire and was a secular kingdom with sufficient proofs. Buddhism supports secularism not the Sanatan dharma or Hinduism or any other religions in the planet. When we say India it includes even Pakistan, Bangladesh including present India. India means (Pakistan provinces as states+India+Bangladesh provinces as States). So in my opinion India is perfect name to adopt as our federal republics name excluding Hindustan and Bharat. As I said Prophet Muhammad born in 570AD and reveled his religion Islam in his forties i.e. in 610AD; after that his embraced religion invaders invaded India after 610AD so Hindu word came to India after 610AD. Since before 610AD there was no Hindu word had existed so present Hindus were designated as Sanatanis or followers of Sanatan Dharma which was a fast growing religion by Brahmins that was promoting Vedic fourfold caste system or Purusha Shukta in that age by hook and crooks declining Indians largest faith Buddhism. Present India is nothing but united kingdom or “Akhand Rajya” of Mauryan empire or Kingdom of Asoka. In the age of Ashoka i.e. after 262 BCE the major religion of the kingdom was Buddhism. It means the major ancestors of Pakistan, India and Bangladesh were majorly Buddhist, it does not mean Jainism, Ajivika, Charavaka, Lokayata, Alekha, Yoga, Sankhya, Mimsnsa, Naya and Sanatan dharma etc., were not in that age; They were but their followers were very less comparing to Buddhism; and major faiths were in the race of growing their faith or making their followers crowed bigger. The first national religion of India+Pakistan+Bangladesh, Burma, Nepal, Afghanistan and Bhutan is Buddhism. In the age of Ashoka “Sanatan Dharma” was known as Vedism or Brahmanism which was promoting fourfold caste system and majorly worshiping to fire i.e. we now called as Yangya or Havan. Brahmanism is based upon social management system according to parts of the human body. They divide society according to major professions symbolizing parts of the body and certifying specific profession fixing to certain people which should be inherited; and change of profession, surname and choice of sexual partners form other classes are declined. Yangya or havan used to pyre or burn animals like majorly cow and horses which is known as gomedha (cow sacrifice) and Ashwamedha (horse sacrifice) yangya. It’s quite transparent Brahmins were used to eat cows and horses after they officiating yangya ceremonies.  It’s because Brahmins were using the word sacrifice where other religions like Buddhism, Jainism, Charvak and Ajivika etc. were against the animal sacrifice and majorly from vegetarian origin. Bramhanism only was a growing faith by Brahmins in that time and they used to implement their fourfold caste system with their invaded or captured demographics. Since Ashoka had won many kingdoms he used to suppress animal sacrifices in the social groups they were practicing and was giving hardcore punishments for such activities. Brahmins were persecuted by Ashoka due to animal sacrifices so they lost their jobs. Most of the Brahmins joined Ashoka’s Army for their livelihood. In this age Brahmins became vegetarian and it became a puritanical reformation to their evolution. Brahmins were very few in numbers in that age so their implemented social group might be also very limited to few regions. Persecution to Vedic Brahmins was great trauma to Brahmins so they were seeking a chance of revenge. In that age some Brahmins also invented prophesy making mind counseling knowledge i.e. astrology and palmistry for their livelihood which can control one’s life, events and shaping a character or personality of a person, due to their diversification of profession. Astrology and palmistry became a major part of their profession in later stage. Due to loss of jobs banning animal sacrifices Ashoka privileged them to join his army. In the age of Ashoka Brahmins were struggling for social existence according to their wish but could not do anything, but when one Brahmin became Army chief of Ashoka’s kingdom named Pushyamitra Shunga it became optimistic to restore the the Brahmanism. After the Ashoka’s death, when his descendants were busy in spreading Buddhism inside and outside of the kingdom, Pushyamitra Shunga dishonestly and mercilessly assassinated Ashoka’s descendant Brihadratha whose guardianship was assigned to Pushyamitra Shunga by Mauryan emperors. Pushyamitra Shunga did not win the kingdom by war but captured dishonestly the Ashoka’s kingdom like a terrorist. After capturing the Ashoka’s kingdom he started to decline Buddhism imposing fourfold caste system to his captured Buddhist kingdom by shine of sword. He killed thousands and thousands of Buddhist monks and destroyed Buddhist emblems created by Ashoka and changed everything in favor of Brahmins by making Brahmins constitution Manusmriti. Brahmins are world’s first recognized radical terrorist group those had eliminated Buddhism in India only through the terrorism and later by hook and crook or by “छल और बल ” for their self and organized benefits. ISIS is the Islamic terrorist group of 21st century but Brahmins are the terrorist from 185BC. They implemented Purusha Sukta by the Shine of sword and by “छल और बल” not by any love and affection or mutual understanding of the followers like Buddhism. Since Buddhism don’t promote violence so easily they wiped out Buddhism by violence and crook in India. It’s the reason why all the citizens of their captured kingdoms classified according to their profession they were doing in that time. Since Brahmins (Vedic Brahmins) were very less they given social status of Brahmins to tribal priests (Brahmin caste adopted priests as Deshi linguistic Brahmins or Pagan Brahmins) those were the care takers of Idol believers or local deities or paganism or tribal idolism in that time of Brahmins age. Since major scripture compositions of Brahmins are in Sanskrit it implies their mother tongue was in Sanskrit. The converted Brahmins are having mother tongue of different languages due to class adoption but used Sanskrit to officiate Vedic rituals. It implies Vedic Brahmins used different linguistic Brahmins for their personal and organized benefits and linguistic Brahmins took the advantages of Brhamins caste for their self and organized benefits knowing it all are wrong and promoted it all generation to generation as organized priesthood for political & racial hegemony. They departed all their rival religions like Buddhism, Jainism, Ajivika, Charvak etc. etc. and included the faith those can be used for their faith promotion. Vedic Brahmins promoted tribal pagan deities it’s the reason why tribal pagan deities placed in Buddhist shrines declining Buddhism. They majorly focused on tribal idolism or polytheism. Idolism is nothing but giving respect to a tribal leader for his/her best work by their social groups. In that time after the death there was no technology to capture their real pictures like photographs so they used to use idols or artistic impression for their representations. Brahmins focused on the pagan identities of different linguistic races and nominated them as their God using a word of identity theft or hack saying it’s as Avatar. Idolism had their own worship method but Brahmins added Brahmins method for worshiping empowering certified priests with Vedic chants and havan or homa or yangya with animal sacrifice they do in their worship method. All pagan famous identities became the part of their created faith which later named as Sanatan Dharma by their spiritual scholars and leaders. Brahmanism is nothing but theocracy by priesthood as theopolitical party. They created trinity i.e. Bramha, Vishnu and Maheswara as creator, savior or maintainer and destroyer of the creation. All tribal famous heroes like Rama, Krishna etc. branded ‘U’ sign in their forehead saying they are avatars of Vishnu. Its some thing like dominating of lordship over the famous tribal identities converting them in to their theological party. They use these identities to promote their faith and place them in the temple for their self and organized benefits. They coin two strong word Papa and Punya i.e. sin or vices and virtues. The sinner must use Brahmins for washing their sins because they are the agents of Gods. The Kshatriya were involving in violence to acquire land to get resources so without violence the profession of a King can’t be performed so without the sin the profession can’t be performed it’s the reason why they became first victims of washing their sins. With the 100% honesty merchants can’t do the business so they were the second victims of Brahmins those had adequate wealth to wash their sins by the Brahmins. Brahmins knew those are economical good and able to give donation to their created identities they should enter in to the temples so they allowed to only Kshatriyas and Vaishyas in the temple but banned to Shudra because they were poor and their living standard was worse than these upper castes and majorly incapable to donate them. They made temple using Shudra and even placed Shudra identities as God but declined Shudra to worship their own tribal heroes from which you can determine the height of antisocial activity by this race. Later they created many mind born identity like Ganesha, Durga, Hanuman, Narshimha etc. etc. to dominate the other religion in the Ashoka kingdom psychologically spreading delusions. Priests are very few in Indian race; if they are now about 6 crores from 130 crores population of India then you can imagine the numbers of priests in the age of Brahmanism. Kings are only Kshatriya not soldiers so how many kings were there in that age of Kingdom you can calculate it’s because there were only 560 kingdoms in the time of independence excluding king of Jammu & Kashmir Hari Singh; they will even less than 1 crore in present population. If you find more Kshatriyas then its only uplifted self-claimed mass of shudras those were upper caste hunger and hating called to be lower caste or Shudras. Out of hundred people how many people were doing the profession of merchants? You can guess yourself…. So those were professing tradings they used to certified as Vashiyas by Vedic promoters. So rest of the mass is Shudra which is the biggest Vedic certified crowed which won’t be less than 80% of total Vedic fourfold caste certified social group. Since major population was Buddhist in the age of kingdom they became Shudra in the age of Bramins empire which were intentionally persecuted by Brahmins by making ban to right to good life, liberty, property, equality, dignity, education, fair justice etc. etc. to Shudra implementing Manusmriti. Brahmins persecution and exploitation to Shudra was racial and it’s a racial organized crime. When after 610 AD Islam came to India it had no strong effect on social groups till Moguls invaded India in 1300AD. Majorly Islamic emperors were establishing their faith by shine of sword. So, many Brahmins, Kshatriyas, Vaishyas, Shudras and even non-religious natives had converted to Islam by Islamic shine of sword. If we will try to trace which Muslim had which Vedic religion before the Islamic invasion to India? it is very difficult to locate their race. Moguls i.e. descendant of Genghis khan when invaded the India they were majorly responsible to spread Islam in Indian demography. Here I must tell you one thing clear that most of the Muslim proud to have a Khan surname which is streams from “Genghis Khan” but Genghis Khan was not a Muslim. Neither Genghis Khan was Muslim nor his four sons i.e. Ögedei Khan, Jochi Khan, Tolui, Chagatai Khan were Muslims; they used to believe in Shamanism or Tengrism. Moguls were descendants of Chagatai Khan those were embraced Islam for their political reasons. In the age of Islamic empire many Shudras those were exploited by Vedic upper castes converted themselves to Islam for only social existence better than Vedism so the original Indian Muslims i.e. from Pakistan+India+Bangladesh is now more than 50 Crores from which only 3% or even less than that are from the origin of outside Invaders race so rest 97% Muslims are root natives of Indian race those had been converted to Islam.  Adopting the religion there is no change in their biological structures but their mind changes according to their religious scriptures and communal feelings or philosophy to guide their life they have been adopted. How their communal feeling can damage our integrity you can verify yourself by just studying their history. When Islam came to India those Brahmins converted to Islam  started to eat cows without any hesitations and restrictions. Islamic rulers were majorly from east regions where cows were not eaten as prime source; and even Arab you can’t find cows farming its because the region belongs to deserts and surviving of cows in that desert in those age was very hard or impossible. So thinking eating of cows from Arabic origin is nullified. Cow eating is having the origin only in India and Muslim invaders learned cow eating practices from only Indians. Brahmins were not given rights to property to Shudras, so Shudra were not eating cows because, to eat cows they must own the cows; again major Shudras were belonging to Buddhist origin, where they were taught of being vegetarian so cow eating from Shudroid origin is also impossible. Cows were taken as wealth in that days and upper castes were the major users of cows. Now when Brahmins those had converted to Islam they got privileged to eat cows without any restrictions because Islam don’t ban on eating cows. It became a practices to Indian Muslims to eat cows again due to  Brahmins those converted to Muslims.

If you deeply study the cow slaughtering controversy in India its totally Brahmins Vs. Brahmins ideology; i.e. Brahmins those had left eating cows due to Ashoka’s persecution and became vegetarians Vs. the Brahmins those converted to Islam and started to eat cows again restoring the original Brahmins practice eating of cows by the protection of Islam.

Since Islam has equality in their followers so those Shudras converted to Islam also got opportunity to eat cows and it became an Islamic practice in India again after Ashoka’s declination of eating cows. Indian Muslims seldom eat camels, those are easily available in Arabic world. Now RSS is an Indian Hindu organization promote Vedic ideology saying it’s the heritage or origin of our Nation, so in direct ways  they admits they are terrorist like Brahmins as they were in the age of Brahmins. Rashtriya Swayamsevak Sangh abbreviated as RSS a “National Volunteer Organisation” or “National Patriotic Organisation”) is a right-wing volunteer, Hindu nationalist, non-governmental organisation having about 5-6 millions members with 56,859 shakhas or branches (2016). The founder of RSS, Keshav Baliram Hedgewar was a member of Hindu Mahasabha also a Brahmin and the organization majorly controlled by Brahmins Vedic ideology. Hedgewar was born on 1 April 1889 in a Marathi Deshastha Brahmin, family in Nagpur and Hedgewar founded the RSS in Nagpur in 1925. It is claimed that; it is the world’s largest voluntary non-governmental organization. RSS states that its ideology is based on the principle of selfless service to India and the establishment of a Hindu Rashtra. The Bharatiya Jana Sangh (abbrv. BJS), commonly known as the Jan Sangh, was an Indian nationalist political party that existed from 1951 to 1977 and was the political arm of Rashtriya Swayamsevak Sangh (RSS), the Hindu right-wing organisation. In 1977, it merged with several other left, centre and right parties opposed to rule of the Indian National Congress and formed the Janata Party. After the Janata Party split in 1980, it was re-formed as the Bharatiya Janata Party (BJP) in 1980, which is currently India’s largest political party by primary membership and representation in Lok Sabha. India got independent in 1947. India is now a Democratic Nation without any direct dominant theocracy like Brahmanism. RSS ideology is to implement Vedic ideology or Brahmans ideology coining we need a Hindu Nation. It means they decline to Democratic Indian republic so need a country as Hindu Rashtra which is directly violation of Indian laws and called treason. Thinking or feeling a Nation as a mother, is not bad; even its not bad saying even “Bharat mata ki jay” till it does not have any evil intention behind the slogan. If the slogan used for any communal benefits, then it’s the part of sedition and its one kind of verbal treason. How? When somebody says “Bharat Mata ki jay” verbal expression does not express how it looks like, what is her religion, what is her caste or the race she belongs to? etc. etc. but majorly Indian geography indicates the land or Nation as mother as an identity; but not RSS’s created mind born identity that looks like Hindu goddess. Mother land means where the mother of a baby had born. It’s not the Hindu goddess that had given birth to all the root natives of India, so using Hindu goddess is solely political for Hindu ideology which can’t be considered as secularism. It’s an anti-national activity with a conspiracy to destroy the national integrity. May some of our freedom fighters used it to warm up them for fight against Britishers but they did not define its artistic impression with any kind of flag its own or those they used the slogan they didn’t have the artistic impression of “Bharat Mata” and her political will as Hindu nationalist. There was no name “Bharat” to represent present India till Hindu Mahasbha formed. Deendayal Upadhyay (25 September 1916 – 11 February 1968) was one of the most important leaders of the Bharatiya Jana Sangh, the forerunner of the present day Bharatiya Janata Party. Sources implicates “Deendayal Upadhyay” was the person that named “Bharat” to “United states of federal kingdoms” which was officially and historically named as India and in the age of Islam “Al-Hind or Hindustan.” Bharat word has no authentic origin without racial domination by RSS Bramhanic ideology. RSS promotes Bharat because they want to make India a racial dominant Nation. Its the reason why RSS promotes the slogan “Bharat mataki jay” with his own created mind born artistic impression identity with their Manuvadi ideology for political benefits and cheap politics to deviate from the root issues and unite the innocent Hindus for vote bank through polarization. Means now “Bharat Mata” promotes Manusmritic ideology and their agenda which is political and National patriotism is only an eyewash. Now so called secular “Bharat mata” became communal and religious as Hindu Mata not the mother of whole the Nation which is the root reason of contradiction. RSS even fabricating the mind born “mother of the land” or “Bharat Mata” in their favor for their personal and organized benefits coining the sentence “Aj ki generation ko Bharata mata ki jay sikhana padeaga”; it means they clarify they are the sole promoters of the Bharat Mata and the slogan “Bharat mata ki jay.” Now those were interested to use “Bharat Mata ki jay” they will even depart psychologically using the slogan due to communal possession to this slogan and hating to RSS. Who made “Bharat Mata” to communal identity? What is the reason behind making her communal? Using other saffron flag by Bharat Mata to represent Indian region in RSS’s official website is showing nonverbal sedition; why there is no action has taken against this organization till to date? Bharat Mata is not a part of our constitution so who gave them right to promote her as Hindu national patriotic icon? Who gave them patriotic rights to the slogan “Bharat Mataki Jay?” as Hindu nationalist slogan? How they impose their personal feeling those don’t utter “Bharat mataki Jay” are all anti nationalist? Why they don’t coin the slogan “Jay India/Hind/Bharat?” Who is this non government organization to certify Indians what should be their patriotic rights according to their filthy determinations and dirty communal philosophy? Is RSS a Government law enforcement agency to determine what should be the patriotic protocols for the nation according to their communal radical think tanks? Why Government is not taking actions against RSS where their major activities are anti national and to destroy the integrity of the nation? If RSS see India as Mother then why it does not promotes in translated forms like “Hindustan Ammi Zindaa baad” why they do not translate the slogans for representing other linguistic communities according to their language? and utter each slogan to promote their feelings? What is the problem in it? If Bharat Mata looks like a Hindu God, then why should not “Hindustan Ammi zaan” will look like a Muslim Identity? Why they are not making a mind born artistic impression for Hindustan Ammi zaan? What is the problem to RSS for making such identities? RSS should make all kind of artistic impression of Bharat Mata for different linguistic and religious races. She Should look like a Christian, Sikh, Muslim, Bengali, Gujrati, Rajasthani, Maharastrian, South Indian etc. etc. what’s the problem in it? If they can make a mind born identity “Bharat Mata” for Hindus then they even can make identity for those linguistic and religious race as Avatars, what makes hurdles to them in making such kind of artistic impression for this Mind born identity? They won’t do it, because they want to do racial hegemony enforcing their mind born identity to major Hindus for political polarization and crowed unification by instigating their own created patriotism as Hindu nationalism, once its established it will automatically convert to Hindu State. They want to promote it for their political benefits to polarize only Hindus those are more than 96.63 crores against Muslims so that minor community will be in chaos of fear factors and easily can manufacture Hindu consents for their vote bank. If Muslims will admit “Bharat Mataki Jay” then their mission Hindu State is accomplished and they can go further for Hindu autocracy and official establishment as Hindu Nation. Once Hindus in their full control then they will play with Hindus, Muslims, Christians and other religious and non-religious Indian citizens according to their nasty ideology. What a nasty and idiotic dirty politics. How these Idiot dirty evil antisocial politicians playing with the innocent and ignorant Hindu followers without their prior knowledge is totally disgusting. Indian people even does not know the insertion of the name “Bharat”  was only intentional to make it a Hindu State in future by orthodox Hindu leaders which is not having any prominent  authentication after only 1947 in our newly made constitution. You can’t find the word “Bharat” in any codes made in India before 1947. Bharat represents communal but India is secular. There is no authentication of this identity Bharat that had ruled whole Indian demography in past excluding Brahmans bluffs. Asoka and Mauryan had ruled the land as largest united kingdom has more authentic proofs than others. Then why it is not Asoka or Mauryan? or “Federal Sates of United Kingdoms” ?

RSS & BJP i.e. Brahmins dominated other castes as their organization only meant to control the Indians or to our administration with an evil intention for a racial hegemony. Religion, tradition, custom, heritage, Bharat, Rama, temple, cow, nationality, terrorism etc. etc. are only political terms for them and are just verbal weapons to establish their hegemony. Crook Brahmins never trusted through out the history. They are only the internal enemy of our country and society. They are only the reasons for discrimination & disharmony and creator of many social evils in Indian race. Crook Brahmins are genetically liars, psychological disordered and knave race or race of crooks or criminals which destroy our multi-linguistic race integrity till to date by war of faith empire.

Only one Party majorly Advocates about “BHARAT” i.e. BJP which was a part of Bharatiya Janasangha ->Which was a part of RSS -> Which was a part of Hindu Mahasabha -> Which was an active organization in the division of India and most of its supporting leaders were dominated & active in congress. All these organizations were/are controlled by only Brahmins. Gandhi & Nehru must had been polarized and influenced by Hindu Mahasava and RSS for which reason “Bharat” word inserted in our constitution. The motive of inserting Bharat word may be for making India in to a “Hindu Rastra” or “Hindu Nation” for which RSS and BJP promote religion politics in India till to date. Start watching them in television & YouTube  most of them don’t use the word “India” in their conversation. There is no authenticity of the name “Bharat.” If we consider “Maha Bharat” as “Big war” then meaning of Bharat is “War.”

Solution to our root problems: We are one Nation so prominently and officially there should be one name. India is a secular term so it should be our only official national name. Non-officially we may give thousand names no problem. It will finish the first poisoned throne embedded in our constitution. It may take long term to resolve the disharmony created by Brahmins but they can start with freedom of surnames or abolition of surnames. People of India has been adopted freedom of professions declining Vedic hereditary professions imposed to them; so its not a social evils to these days. You can find even Brahmins woks as sweepers. Government should promote freedom of surnames or abolition of surnames exposing Purusha Shukta or Varna system by Vedic Brahmins. Media should expose what is Purusha Shukta and its bad effects to our society till to date.  Government should survey first which kind of socioeconomically backward civilians resides in India. Whom we say Dalit or poor what is there standard of socioeconomic status; and to whom we give reservations and what is their socioeconomic index. With their socioeconomic index there will be reservation band. Viz. we give in central-government funded higher education institutions, 22.5% of available seats are reserved for Scheduled Caste (SC) and Scheduled Tribe (ST) students (7.5% for STs, 15% for SCs). This reservation percentage has been raised to 49.5% by including an additional 27% reservation for OBCs. Here we have to decline General, SC, ST & OBC etc. We have to survey their socioeconomic, education & employment index. Suppose in a family; family members are below 10th educated and their annual income is less than 1 lakh they will be considered as Reservation Band-1. If family members below intermediate and their annual family income is less than 5 lakhs then they should be considered as Reservation Band-2. If family members below Post Graduation and their annual family income is less than 10 lakhs and need reservation then they should be considered as Reservation Band-3. In all cases there should an index to compare wealth per member into consideration. Family wealth divided by its members which should taken to consideration according to the above reservation bands.  Reservations should be accordingly the proportion by survey reports as per their present socioeconomic status. Suppose R-1 Band got 60% of the population then for the current administration period it will be 60% of total reservation provided by our constitution. As we know 50.5 is not for reservation and only 49.5 for reservation. So 60% of 49.5% will be reserved for R-1 Band. Our government should decline Surname, Religion, Caste in official identification. For time being government will declare whoever want reservation according to their Vedic classification without any hesitation but regulate with the above principle showing their socioeconomic, education and employment status index. If they are eligible they should go for reservation otherwise they should be declined. In this principle every needy citizen will get reservation irrespective to their religion, caste and creed.

To eradicate war of faith empires in our Nation first our government should create a independent body that will verify the authenticity of different faith system that Indian follows. We don’t live in past; we live in present so our standard of living should be in the present forms not in past forms. Independent religion verifying body should be organized by scientists, doctors, psychologists, sociologist and  legal professionals from intellectual mass, even intellectuals from out side of our country including personalities like James Randy, Richard Dawkins, Christopher Hitchens and Sam Harris not stupid so called intellectuals & polarized stupid scholars those promote irrationality even being a scientists and doctors. Every faith system’s promoters leader and organization will produce their authentications to this independent body created by government. Government will declare award of 5000 cores rupees who can prove under proper observing conditions, evidence of any paranormal, supernatural, or occult power in our faith system those are followed by our citizens. Which will be detected as wrong by religion verifying independent body it should be declared as illegitimate in our National faith structure which will help to make a censorship law for scriptures and practices followed by various religions in India. Religion censorship law will be mandatory to our Nation.  The faith system & the scriptures those promote, spreading lies, conspiring for personal and organized benefits, blind beliefs, superstitions, exploitation, irrationalities, discrimination, miss carriage of information , cheating, cruelties, atrocities, corruptions, favoritism, nepotism, traitors, racial ego and status addiction, social prestige hunger & self-claimed great by birth, claiming of Scholar(Pandit) by birth and studying Hindu scriptures, extremism, orthodox, radicalism, Jihadist, Hindu terrorism and different kind of antisocial activities done by priests of different faith system i.e. Hindu, Muslims, Christians etc. in the name of Hinduism/Islam/Christianity etc. or Religion, custom, culture, and heritage till to date in India should be controlled and banned by this Religion censorship law. Scriptures, TV shows, books etc. those will be used for promotion without editing contradictions after the declaration of Religious censorship laws or violate Religious censorship laws in any kind will be punished accordingly and publishers should be banned, fined & jailed. Religion practices should be a matter of personal likeness not as public and hereditary as claimed by our ancestors. Kids should not be polarized and should be departed from any kind of faith system till they have mature standard of understandings about the religious faith systems. Polarization and radicalization to any faith system to their children should be punishable by law.

Marriage, birth and cremation should be compulsorily conducted by our Government its because here is the only key point religions took the advantages. Every marriage should be conducted by our Nation by creating compulsory registry marriage. Marriage certification should be compulsory in every government proceedings for spouses and their family. The traditional marriage expenses and unofficial dowry should be 100% taxable. It means if x wants to marry y, first he should tell the government I want to marry y then simply Government will conduct the marriage below Rs 500/- and certify their marriage. If bride or groom wants to perform their traditional marriage publicly apart from official marriage then they have to inform under which budgets they want to conduct the marriage ceremony so that government will impose 100% tax on that traditional marriage system to stop social evils created by showing or propaganda marriage system. Non informed traditional marriage should be fined by 500% of their budgets. Cremation of a citizen should be conducted by our Government to eradicate traditional religious involvement in our nation. We can even control population by imposing monogamy/polygamy but one male should have only two/one kids.

Diversity of  Religions and their irrational, illegitimate or anti-moral elements stagnates India till to date in various ways and created many social evils. Right to Freedom of Religion from our constitutional fundamental rights should be removed and it should be a choice to the citizens of India what they want in their religious believe but should not be a mandatory right. When we give Freedom of Religion as fundamental right then in indirect ways we give the rights to promote the stupid things in their religion which is the root cause of all evils. If a human changes biologically and mentally through out his life i.e. the men in their 10+, 20+ … 90+ age has no same body structures and same mental ability then why we promote the same things of the religions without any changes? In past there were kingdoms and religions had used as a political tool to unify the citizens; now we are democracy so we need changes according to our present living requirements, why should we care about past? There was no Buddhist followers before 563BC, there was no Vedic mass follower before 185BC, There was no Christianity before 4BC, there was no Islam before 570AD,  there was no Hindus before 700AD, There was no official India before 1600AD, There was no official Bharat and Pakistan before 1947 ….. every time we gone through the changes with the time, then why we can’t go again changes according to our requirements?

WE ARE ONE NATION SO LAW SHOULD BE SAME FOR ALL, BUT AFTER THE ABOVE THINGS IMPLEMENTATION; AUTOMATICALLY OUR COUNTRY WILL FOLLOW UNIFORM CIVIL CODE WITHOUT CHANGING THEIR RELIGIOUS BELIEFS. WE SHOULD POLARIZE PAKISTAN AND BANGLADESH CITIZENS TO REUNION BUT REMOVING THEIR ISLAMIC ADDICTIONS; BUT BEFORE THAT WE HAVE TO REMOVE MANUVAD OR VEDISM IN INDIA. VEDISM IS ORIGIN OF INDIA IS A GREAT LIE AND ONLY HYPES BY BRAHMINS. ONLY 20% OF 6 CRORES BRAHMINS ARE ONLY THE MIND CONTROLLER; VERY FEW OF THEM FROM VEDIC ORIGIN AND REST ARE ALL FROM LINGUISTIC OR TRIBAL IDOL WORSHIPERS OR PUJARI CONVERTED TO BRAHMINS AS PRADESHIK BRAHMINS OR KARMAKANDIK BRAHMINS i.e. THOSE BRAHMINS HAS MOTHER TONGUE OTHER THAN SANSKRIT ALL ARE NON-SANSKRIT LINGUISTIC OR KARMAKANDIK BRAHMINS i.e. ABOUT 1.2 CRORE BRAHMINS NEED TO RECTIFY TO SAVE OUR NATION. IF THEY CAN’T BE RECTIFIED THEN THEY SHOULD LEAVE OUR COUNTRY WITH SUFFICIENT WEALTH TO OTHER NATIONS OR OUR GOVERNMENT SHOULD PUT ALL TO THEM IN JAIL SO THAT THEY CAN’T MAKE FURTHER DISTURBANCES IN OUR NATION.

We should not in path of divide India again, but should be in the path of reunion.

Rabindranath Tagore (Brahmin) wrote the National  anthem using dominating name “Bharat.”

जन गण मन अधिनायक जय हे, भारत भाग्य विधाता।

पंजाब सिंधु गुजरात मराठा, द्रविड़ उत्कल बंग।

विंध्य हिमाचल यमुना गंगा, उच्छल जलधि तरंग।

तव शुभ नामे जागे, तव शुभ आशीष मागे।

गाहे तव जयगाथा।

जन गण मंगलदायक जय हे, भारत भाग्य विधाता।

जय हे, जय हे, जय हे, जय जय जय जय हे॥

Meaning Explained by Rajiv Dixit (Brahmin but was a famous secular, liberal Indian patriot & social reformist).


Sare Jahan se Accha Hindustan hamara  is an Urdu language patriotic song written by Muhammad Iqbal (Now Spiritual father of Pakistan). It is often rendered during patriotic occasions in India and is used as a marching song at a number of national events including the Indian Armed Forces Beating the Retreat ceremony.

सारे जहाँ से अच्छा हिन्दोसिताँ हमारा
हम बुलबुलें हैं इसकी यह गुलसिताँ हमारा

ग़ुर्बत में हों अगर हम, रहता है दिल वतन में
समझो वहीं हमें भी दिल हो जहाँ हमारा

परबत वह सबसे ऊँचा, हम्साया आसमाँ का
वह संतरी हमारा, वह पासबाँ हमारा

गोदी में खेलती हैं इसकी हज़ारों नदियाँ
गुल्शन है जिनके दम से रश्क-ए-जनाँ हमारा

ऐ आब-ए-रूद-ए-गंगा! वह दिन हैं याद तुझको?
उतरा तिरे किनारे जब कारवाँ हमारा

मज़्हब नहीं सिखाता आपस में बैर रखना
हिंद्वी हैं हम, वतन है हिन्दोसिताँ हमारा

यूनान-ओ-मिस्र-ओ-रूमा सब मिट गए जहाँ से
अब तक मगर है बाक़ी नाम-ओ-निशाँ हमारा

कुछ बात है कि हस्ती मिटती नहीं हमारी
सदियों रहा है दुश्मन दौर-ए-ज़माँ हमारा

इक़्बाल! कोई महरम अपना नहीं जहाँ में
मालूम क्या किसी को दर्द-ए-निहाँ हमारा!

TRACE THE MOTIVES FROM BOTH THE SONGS AND COMPARE WHICH IS MORE SECULAR AND MORE PATRIOTIC OR WHICH IS MORE COMMUNAL. IF YOU CAN UNDERSTAND THE MOTIVES IN THE SONGS THEN YOU CAN EASILY RECOGNIZE WHO WERE MORE PATRIOTIC AND WHO PLAYED KEY ROLE DIVIDING INDIA.

Promotion of  “बन्दे मातरम्” by RSS

Sanskrit is not our National language though we have Nagari i.e. well known as Hindi is the major used language of the nation; Its the reason why it is our national language. Bande matarm is written in Sanskrit i.e. Language of Vedic Brahmins those has been implemented fourfold caste system to this demography for their racial hegemoney and Brahmins of the country promoted the language being their executives. RSS is an orthodox theopolitical organization of Brahmins and has an evil intention making India as Brahmin dominated Nation as before. Promoting “बन्दे मातरम्” & “Bharat Mata” is an evil intention of these Brahmins to dominate India according to their own wish. Why “बन्दे मातरम्” is not written in Hindi though Hindi is our National language? Why Indians has to follow Brahmins order to proof their Nationalism? Its time to depart 6 Crore Brahmins from India as orthodox Muslims departed themselves as Pakistan.

Posted in Uncategorized | Leave a comment